Please wait a minute...
Journal of Chinese Society for Corrosion and protection  2026, Vol. 46 Issue (4): 1067-1080    DOI: 10.11902/1005.4537.2025.298
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Effect of Water Chemistry on Stress Corrosion Cracking of T22 Steel Used in Once Through Steam Generator of Nuclear Power
WANG Lei1, TAO Zeyu2, LIU Feng3, KUANG Wenjun4(), MA Xin2, YAO Yao3, ZHANG Guowei1
1.CNNC Xiapu Nuclear Power Co. Ltd., Ningde 355100, China
2.School of Materials Science and Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China
3.China Xi'an Thermal Power Research Institute Co. Ltd., Xi'an 710054, China
4.School of Materials Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China
Cite this article: 

WANG Lei, TAO Zeyu, LIU Feng, KUANG Wenjun, MA Xin, YAO Yao, ZHANG Guowei. Effect of Water Chemistry on Stress Corrosion Cracking of T22 Steel Used in Once Through Steam Generator of Nuclear Power. Journal of Chinese Society for Corrosion and protection, 2026, 46(4): 1067-1080.

Download:  HTML  PDF(42532KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

For the known generation IV nuclear power plants, such as high-temperature gas-cooled reactors (HTGRs) and sodium-cooled fast reactors (SFRs), once-through steam generators typically adopt a reducing all-volatile treatment [AVT(R)] as the feedwater chemistry control strategy. However, this water chemistry induces flow-accelerated corrosion (FAC) for the related structural components, which can result in heat-transfer tube fouling and throttling valve blockage. Oxygenated treatment (OT) is an effective approach to mitigate throttling valve deposition. Nevertheless, the potential impact of increased dissolved oxygen on the stress corrosion cracking (SCC) susceptibility of structural materials remains to be clarified. In this study, the SCC behavior of T22 steel, widely used in the evaporator section of once-through steam generators in Generation IV reactors, was systematically evaluated in conditions of AVT(R), AVT(O), and OT respectively by using slow strain rate tensile (SSRT) tests. The results demonstrate that an increased dissolved oxygen concentration does not significantly alter the oxidation behavior of T22 steel. Importantly, the adoption of oxidizing AVT or OT conditions does not increase the SCC susceptibility of T22 steel. This work provides a technical foundation for addressing throttling valve deposition in once-through steam generators and offers valuable guidance for optimizing feedwater chemistry in generation IV nuclear power systems.

Key words:  sodium-cooled fast reactor      feed water oxygenation      stress corrosion cracking      slow strain rate tensile test      T22 steel     
Received:  16 September 2025      32134.14.1005.4537.2025.298
ZTFLH:  TG174  
Corresponding Authors:  KUANG Wenjun, E-mail: wjkuang@scut.edu.cn

URL: 

https://www.jcscp.org/EN/10.11902/1005.4537.2025.298     OR     https://www.jcscp.org/EN/Y2026/V46/I4/1067

SteelCSiMnPSCrNiMoFe
ASME SA-213M0.05-0.15≤ 0.500.3-0.6≤ 0.025≤ 0.0251.9-2.6-0.87-1.13Bal.
T22 steel0.0970.260.460.0100.00412.200.040.97Bal.
Table 1  Chemical composition of T22 steel used in the test (mass fraction / %)
Fig.1  Original microstructure morphology (a) and room temperature tensile curve (b) of T22 steel
Simulated conditionDesigned pHTemperature / ℃DO or N2H4 concentration / μg·L-1Pressure / MPaAverage pH
AVT(R)-LT9.1-9.3210N2H4: 20-6014-159.14
AVT(R)-HT9.1-9.3320N2H4: 20-6014-159.14
AVT(O)-LT9.4-9.8210DO < 1014-159.65
AVT(O)-HT9.4-9.8320DO < 1014-159.62
OT-LT9.0-9.3210DO: 10-3014-159.22
OT-HT9.0-9.3320DO: 10-3014-159.20
Table 2  Test conditions for safety evaluation of T22 steel in heat exchange tubes
Fig.2  Schematic diagram of samples for scratch measurement (a, b) and size of tensile samples (c) (unit: mm)
Fig.3  SSRT curves at low-temperature (a) and high-temperature (b) with the strain rate of 5 × 10-8 /s
Fig.4  Surface morphologies of T22 steel after slow strain rate tensile tests under AVT(R)-LT (a), AVT(R)-HT (b), AVT(O)-LT (c), AVT(O)-HT (d), OT (low DO concentration)-LT (e), OT (low DO concentration)-HT (f)
Fig.5  Cross-sectional morphologies of T22 steel after SSRT under AVT(R)-LT (a), AVT(R)-HT (b), AVT(O)-LT (c), AVT(O)-HT (d), OT (low DO concentration)-LT (e), OT (low DO concentration)-HT (f)
Fig.6  SSRT curves at low-temperature (a) and high-temperature (b) with strain rate of 5 × 10-7 /s
Fig.7  Surface morphologies of failed T22 steel sample under AVT (R)-LT condition: (a) SE image of the sample surface, (b) SE image away from the fracture area, (c) BSE image away from the fracture area, (d) SE image of the fracture area, (e) BSE image of the fracture area
Fig.8  Surface morphologies of failed T22 steel sample under AVT (R)-HT condition: (a) SE image of the sample surface, (b) SE image away from the fracture area, (c) BSE image away from the fracture area, (d) SE image of the fracture area, (e) BSE image of the fracture area
Fig.9  Surface morphologies of failed T22 steel sample under OT (low DO concentration)-LT condition: (a) SE image of the sample surface, (b) SE image away from the fracture area, (c) BSE image away from the fracture area, (d) SE image of the fracture area
Fig.10  Surface morphologies of failed T22 steel sample under OT (low DO concentration)-HT condition: (a) SE image of the sample surface, (b) SE image away from the fracture area, (c) BSE image away from the fracture area, (d) SE image of the fracture area, (e) BSE image of the fracture area
Fig.11  Fracture surface morphologies of T22 steel tested under AVT(R)-LT condition: (a) macrograph, (b, c) partial enlarged detail
Fig.12  Fracture surface morphologies of T22 steel tested under AVT(R)-HT conditio: (a-d) partial enlarged detail, (e) macrograph
Fig.13  Fracture surface morphologies of T22 steel tested under OT (low DO concentration)-LT condition: (a-d) partial enlarged detail, (e) macrograph
Fig.14  Fracture surface morphologies of T22 steel tested under OT (low DO concentration)-HT condition: (a-d) partial enlarged detail, (e) macrograph
Fig.15  Statistics on the fracture types of T22 steel tested under OT (low DO concentration) condition at low-temperature (a) and high-temperature (b)
Fig.16  Cross-sectional morphologies of T22 steel coupons oxidized under AVT(R)-LT (a), AVT(R)-HT (b), AVT(O)-LT (c), AVT(O)-HT (d), OT (low DO concentration)-LT (e), OT (low DO concentration)-HT (f)
Fig.17  XRD patterns of the oxide formed on T22 steel coupons at low-temperature (a) and high-temperature (b)
Simulated conditionMaximum tensile strength / MPaActual elongation after fracture / %Percentage of ductile fracture in the cross-section / %ISCC(A)/ %ISCC(ω)/ %
AVT(R)-LT53416.051002.33.6
OT-LT52515.6896.4
AVT(R)-HT54117.41000.64.0
OT-HT53017.396
Table 3  Comparison of tensile test results of T22 steel samples under two conditions
Fig.18  Pourbaix diagram of the iron component in the Fe-Cr binary system at 15 MPa in low-temperature (a) and high-temperature (b) water (Fe[aq]tot = Cr[aq]tot = 10-6 mol/kg H2O)
[1] Shen Q, Liu H G, Yang J. Analysis and prevention of sulfate scale on throttle orifices for water walls of USC vertical tube coil once-through boilers [J]. E. China Electr. Power, 2009, 37: 877
沈 琦, 刘鸿国, 杨 菁. 超超临界垂直管圈直流炉水冷壁节流孔圈垢物聚结原因分析及预防 [J]. 华东电力, 2009, 37: 877
[2] Shao T Y, Wen G H. Investigation on magnetic oxide iron deposition of throttle orifice plate in once-through boiler water wall [J]. Huadian Technol., 2009, 31(6): 45
邵天佑, 闻国华. 直流锅炉水冷壁节流孔板磁性氧化铁沉积探讨 [J]. 华电技术, 2009, 31(6): 45
[3] Tang P J, Liang B. Causes of cracking of T22 high temperature superheater tube of 120 t/h steam boiler [J]. Ind. Boil., 2022, (4): 60
汤鹏杰, 梁 斌. 120 t/h蒸汽锅炉T22高温过热器管开裂原因 [J]. 工业锅炉, 2022, (4): 60
[4] Zhang G Q, Yao H M, Sun Y P, et al. General corrosion behavior of T22 material in high temperature and high pressure water chemical environment [J]. Therm. Power Gener., 2020, 49(9): 93
张贵泉, 姚洪猛, 孙雅萍 等. 高温高压水化学环境T22材质均匀腐蚀行为研究 [J]. 热力发电, 2020, 49(9): 93
[5] Li J F, Zhu X H, Wang Y, et al. Study on high temperature oxidation test of SA213T22 heat transfer tubes for steam generator in nuclear power plant [J]. Hot Work. Technol., 2016, 45(16): 42
李巨峰, 朱兴华, 汪 垠 等. 核电厂蒸汽发生器SA213 T22传热管高温氧化试验研究 [J]. 热加工工艺, 2016, 45(16): 42
[6] Su H Z, Huang T, Zhang L F, et al. Effect of water chemistry on the performance of alloy 800H in supercritical water-cooled reactor [J]. Nucl. Power Eng., 2023, 44(5): 267
苏豪展, 黄 涛, 张乐福 等. 水化学因素对800H合金在超临界水冷堆中服役性能研究 [J]. 核动力工程, 2023, 44(5): 267
[7] Ji Y F, Hao L, Wang J Q, et al. Research progress on compatibility between alkalizing agents and materials in PWR secondary circuit [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Prot., 2024, 44: 267
冀跃飞, 郝 龙, 王俭秋 等. 压水堆二回路碱化剂与材料的相容性研究进展 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2024, 44: 267
doi: 10.11902/1005.4537.2023.090
[8] Wang Z P, Zhang L, Liu J N, et al. Failure analysis of high temperature steam oxidation of T22 and T91 tubes for power station [J]. Foundry Technol., 2004, 25: 523
王正品, 张 路, 刘江南 等. 电站用T22及与T91管高温蒸汽氧化的失效分析 [J]. 铸造技术, 2004, 25: 523
[9] Zhang N Q, Xu H, Bai Y, et al. Influence of dissolved oxygen concentration on oxidation of low alloy steel T24 exposed to supercritical water [J]. Proc. CSEE, 2011, 31(35): 123
张乃强, 徐 鸿, 白 杨 等. 溶解氧浓度对低合金钢T24在超临界水中氧化的影响 [J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2011, 31(35): 123
[10] Li H M, Yang W, Cai X, et al. Fractography of the stress corrosion cracking specimens of type 304 stainless steel in high temperature water containing boric acid and lithium ion [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Prot., 2004, 24: 16
李红梅, 杨 武, 蔡 珣 等. 304不锈钢在含硼和锂的高温水中的应力腐蚀破裂和断口分析 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2004, 24: 16
[11] Liu Y T, Chen Z Y, Zhu Z L, et al. SCC susceptibility of 2.25Cr-1Mo steel and its weld joints in high temperature steam [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Prot., 2022, 42: 647
刘宇桐, 陈震宇, 朱忠亮 等. 2.25Cr1Mo钢及其焊接接头在高温水蒸气中的应力腐蚀开裂敏感性研究 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2022, 42: 647
doi: 10.11902/1005.4537.2021.157
[12] Xie J Y, Zhang S H, Dong J Y, et al. Insights into the superior stress corrosion cracking resistance of FeCrAl alloy in high temperature hydrogenated water: the critical role of grain boundary oxidation [J]. Corros. Sci., 2022, 208: 110668
doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2022.110668
[13] Zhang S H, Liu X Q, Wang W, et al. On the stress corrosion crack initiation behaviour of Alloy 800 in high-temperature hydrogenated water [J]. Corros. Sci., 2024, 238: 112358
doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2024.112358
[14] Ning Z H, Zhang H R, Zhang S H, et al. Effects of precipitation on the stress corrosion crack initiation of alloy 718 in simulated pressurized water reactor primary environment [J]. Acta Mater., 2024, 276: 120127
doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2024.120127
[15] Zhang S H, Wang S K, Feng X Y, et al. Insights into the stress corrosion cracking resistance of a selective laser melted 304L stainless steel in high-temperature hydrogenated water [J]. Acta Mater., 2023, 244: 118561
doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118561
[16] Kuang W J, Song M, Was G S. Insights into the stress corrosion cracking of solution annealed alloy 690 in simulated pressurized water reactor primary water under dynamic straining [J]. Acta Mater., 2018, 151: 321
doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.04.002
[17] Li W P, Luo K J, Wang H S, et al. Effect of precipitation on stress corrosion cracking initiation of nickel based 718 alloy in high temperature and high pressure water [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Prot., 2025, 45: 947
李维鹏, 罗坤杰, 王惠生 等. 沉淀相对镍基718合金高温高压水环境应力腐蚀裂纹萌生行为影响研究 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45: 947
doi: 10.11902/1005.4537.2024.319
[18] Li K Y, Wu Y, Zhang G L, et al. Research progress of environmental cracking of structural metallic materials for high temperature supercritical CO2 system [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Prot., 2025, 45: 61
李开洋, 吴 悠, 张冠霖 等. 高温超临界CO2结构材料环境致裂研究进展 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45: 61
doi: 10.11902/1005.4537.2024.280
[19] Lu H, Shen Z, Zhang L F, et al. Effects of dissolved oxygen and temperature on the stress corrosion of 06Cr17Ni12Mo2Ti stainless steel in supercritical water [J]. Chin. J. Eng., 2015, 37: 1456
陆 辉, 沈 朝, 张乐福 等. 溶解氧和温度对06Cr17Ni12Mo2Ti不锈钢在超临界水中应力腐蚀的影响 [J]. 工程科学学报, 2015, 37: 1456
[20] Chen K, Zhou Y H, Zhu F W, et al. Investigation on the SCC susceptibility of a heat-optimized L-PBF 304L stainless steel in simulated primary water [J]. J. Nucl. Mater., 2025, 607: 155685
doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2025.155685
[21] Tsuchiya Y, Kano F, Saito N, et al. SCC and irradiation properties of metals under supercritical-water cooled power reactor conditions [A]. GENES4/ANP2003 [C]. Kyoto, 2003: 1096
[22] Maeng W Y, Lee J H, Kim U C. Environmental effects on the stress corrosion cracking susceptibility of 3.5NiCrMoV steels in high temperature water [J]. Corros. Sci., 2005, 47: 1876
doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2004.09.022
[23] Li F T, Liu G M, Liu H H, et al. Stress corrosion cracking susceptibility of TP439 stainless steel in high temperature water vapor [J]. Surf. Technol., 2024, 53(2): 71
李富天, 刘光明, 刘欢欢 等. 高温水蒸气环境中TP439不锈钢的应力腐蚀开裂敏感性 [J]. 表面技术, 2024, 53(2): 71
[24] Xu L Y, Wang H, Zhao L, et al. Study on stress corrosion behavior of domestic forged 316L stainless steel in high temperature and high pressure water environment [J]. J. Mech. Eng., 2018, 54(10): 53
doi: 10.3901/JME.2018.10.053
徐连勇, 王 浩, 赵 雷 等. 国产锻造态316L不锈钢在高温高压水环境中的应力腐蚀行为研究 [J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(10): 53
doi: 10.3901/JME.2018.10.053
[25] Kanzaki M, Masaki Y, Kudo T. Effect of Cr and Ni on stress corrosion cracking susceptibility in Ni-Cr-Fe alloys under simulated pressurized water reactor primary conditions [J]. Corrosion, 2015, 71: 1027
doi: 10.5006/1696
[26] Dugdale H, Armstrong D E J, Tarleton E, et al. How oxidized grain boundaries fail [J]. Acta Mater., 2013, 61: 4707
doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.05.012
[27] Swaminathan S, Sun K, Was G S. Decoupling the roles of grain boundary oxidation and stress in IASCC of neutron-irradiated 304L stainless steel [J]. J. Nucl. Mater., 2023, 585: 154604
doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2023.154604
[28] Zhang N Q. Research on oxide scale growth mechanism of boiler tube in power plant exposed to supercritical water with dissolved oxygen [D]. Baoding: North China Electric Power University, 2012
张乃强. 电站锅炉管氧化层在溶氧超临界水中生长机理的研究 [D]. 保定: 华北电力大学, 2012
[29] Beverskog B, Puigdomenech I. Pourbaix diagrams for the ternary system of iron-chromium-nickel [J]. Corrosion, 1999, 55: 1077
doi: 10.5006/1.3283945
[30] Scott P M, Combrade P. General corrosion and stress corrosion cracking of Alloy 600 in light water reactor primary coolants [J]. J. Nucl. Mater., 2019, 524: 340
doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.04.023
[31] Woo M, Liang C. Electrochemical potential measurement of stainless steel in high temperature dynamic water loop [J]. J. Chin. Corros. Eng., 1993, 7: 47
[32] Wada Y, Ishida K, Tachibana M, et al. High temperature electrochemica reaction parameters affecting elecrochemical corrosion potential of type 316L stainless steel [J]. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 2021, 59: 491
doi: 10.1080/00223131.2021.1980447
[1] ZHANG Deping, YAN Lizhen, YU Yang, YANG Guangming, DAI Chunyu, MEGN Le, XU Bo, LIU Zhiyong. Fracture Failure Mechanism of N80 Tubing in Sophisticated CO2 Flooding Production Well Environment[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45(6): 1698-1708.
[2] SU Zhicheng, ZHANG Xian, CHENG Yan, LIU Jing, WU Kaiming. Comparative Study on Stress Corrosion Cracking Behavior of Ultrafine Bainitic Steel and Q&P Steel with Same Composition in Seawater[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2024, 44(6): 1495-1506.
[3] ZHANG Zhuanli, DAI Hailong, ZHANG Zhe, SHI Shouwen, CHEN Xu. Stress Corrosion Cracking Behavior of 316L in Hydrofluoric Acid Solution[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2024, 44(6): 1633-1640.
[4] LIU Jiuyun, DONG Lijin, ZHANG Yan, WANG Qinying, LIU Li. Research Progress on Sulfide Stress Corrosion Cracking of Dissimilar Weld Joints in Oil and Gas Fields[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2024, 44(4): 863-873.
[5] LI Chan, WANG Qingtian, YANG Chenggang, ZHANG Xianwei, HAN Dongao, LIU Yuwei, LIU Zhiyong. Corrosion Behavior of 904L Super-austenitic Stainless Steel in Simulated Primary Water in Nuclear Power Plants[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2024, 44(3): 716-724.
[6] YUAN Yu, XIANG Yong, LI Chen, ZHAO Xuehui, YAN Wei, YAO Erdong. Research Progress on Corrosion of CO2 Injection Well Tubing in CCUS System[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2024, 44(1): 15-26.
[7] LI Shuang, DONG Lijin, ZHENG Huaibei, WU Chengchuan, WANG Hongli, LING Dong, WANG Qinying. Research Progress of Stress Corrosion Cracking of Ultra-high Strength Steels for Aircraft Landing Gear[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2023, 43(6): 1178-1188.
[8] LIU Baoping, ZHANG Zhiming, WANG Jianqiu, HAN En-Hou, KE Wei. Review of Stress Corrosion Crack Initiation of Nuclear Structural Materials in High Temperature and High Pressure Water[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2022, 42(4): 513-522.
[9] LIU Yutong, CHEN Zhenyu, ZHU Zhongliang, FENG Rui, BAO Hansheng, ZHANG Naiqiang. SCC Susceptibility of 2.25Cr1Mo Steel and Its Weld Joints in High Temperature Steam[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2022, 42(4): 647-654.
[10] LIU Haochen, FAN Lin, ZHANG Haibing, WANG Yingying, TANG Junlei, BAI Xuehan, SUN Mingxian. Research Progress of Stress Corrosion Cracking of Ti-alloy in Deep Sea Environments[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2022, 42(2): 175-185.
[11] YU Deyuan, LIU Zhiyong, DU Cuiwei, HUANG Hui, LIN Nan. Research Progress and Prospect of Stress Corrosion Cracking of Pipeline Steel in Soil Environments[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2021, 41(6): 737-747.
[12] SUN Baozhuang, ZHOU Xiaocheng, LI Xiaorong, SUN Weilu, LIU Zirui, WANG Yuhua, HU Yang, LIU Zhiyong. Stress Corrosion Cracking Behavior of 316L Stainless Steel with Varying Microstructure in Ammonium Chloride Environment[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2021, 41(6): 811-818.
[13] LIN Zhaohui, MING Nanxi, HE Chuan, ZHENG Ping, CHEN Xu. Effect of Hydrostatic Pressure on Corrosion Behavior of X70 Steel in Simulated Sea Water[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2021, 41(3): 307-317.
[14] WANG Xintong, CHEN Xu, HAN Zhenze, LI Chengyuan, WANG Qishan. Stress Corrosion Cracking Behavior of 2205 Duplex Stainless Steel in 3.5%NaCl Solution with Sulfate Reducing Bacteria[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2021, 41(1): 43-50.
[15] MA Mingwei, ZHAO Zhihao, JING Siwen, YU Wenfeng, GU Yien, WANG Xu, WU Ming. Corrosion Behavior of 17-4 PH Stainless Steel in Simulated Seawater Containing SRB[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2020, 40(6): 523-528.
No Suggested Reading articles found!