Please wait a minute...
中国腐蚀与防护学报  2013, Vol. 33 Issue (6): 501-506    
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 |
变电站接地网的防腐方法研究
林永华1 张雪峰2 韩 利3 张兰河2
1. 哈尔滨电力职业技术学院 哈尔滨 150030;
2. 东北电力大学化学工程学院 吉林 132012;
3. 宁夏电力公司电力科学研究院 银川 750011
Comparison of Corrosion Protection Measures of Grounding Grids for Electric Power Station
LIN Yonghua1, ZHANG Xuefeng2, HAN Li3, ZHANG Lanhe2
1. Harbin Electric Power Vocational Technology College, Harbin 150030, China;
2. School of Chemical Engineering, Northeast Dianli University, Jilin 132012, China;
3. Ningxia Electric Power Research Institute, Yinchuan 750011, China
全文: PDF(2304 KB)  
摘要: 利用埋片失重法及电化学法测定接地网试片的腐蚀速率,对比分析了缓蚀剂、牺牲阳极阴极保护法及缓蚀剂-牺牲阳极阴极保护联合保护3种方法的优缺点。结果表明:分别采用1%钼酸钠、2%六偏磷酸钠和4%硅酸钠作为缓蚀剂,Q235钢接地网在土壤中的缓蚀效果均较好,接地网试片的腐蚀速率均减小至0.1200 mm/a,保护度能达到约70%;采用六偏磷酸钠+钼酸钠的复配缓蚀剂,Q235钢的腐蚀速率从0.4667 mm/a减小至0.0873 mm/a,保护度达到81.3%;采用镁牺牲阳极阴极保护技术,Q235钢的腐蚀速率从0.2671 mm/a 减小至0.0639 mm/a,保护度为76.1%;采用复配缓蚀剂-牺牲阳极法联合保护,Q235钢的腐蚀速率从0.3342 mm/a减小至0.0260 mm/a,保护度可达92.2%。
关键词 接地网缓蚀剂阴极保护    
Abstract:In order to prolong the service life of grounding grid for electric power station, the corrosion rate of grid without and with protection measures was evaluated by weight-loss method and electrochemical method respectively. The advantages and disadvantages of corrosion inhibitor, sacrificial anode cathodic protection and combined measure of corrosion inhibitor and sacrificial anode cathodic protection are compared and analyzed. The results show that three inhibitors of 1% of Na2MoO4, 2% of (NaPO3)6 and 4% of Na2SiO3 all show good efficiency in corrosion inhibition on Q235 steel grounding grid. The corrosion rate of grounding grid nearly decreased to 0.1200 mm/a with an inhibition efficiency about 70%. When (NaPO3)6+Na2MoO4 is used as mixed inhibitor, the corrosion rate of Q235 steel decreased from 0.4667 to 0.0873 mm/a with an inhibition efficiency up to 81.3%. Furthermore, by using magnesium sacrificial anode for cathodic protection, the corrosion rate of Q235 steel decreased from 0.2671 to 0.0639 mm/a with an inhibition efficiency up to 76.1%. By using combined protection measure of corrosion inhibitor plus sacrificial anode,the corrosion rate of Q235 steel decreased from 0.3342 to 0.0260 mm/a and inhibition efficiency is up to 92.2%.
Key wordsgrounding grid    corrosion inhibitor    cathodic protection
收稿日期: 2013-04-17     
ZTFLH:  TG174  
基金资助:吉林省科技发展计划社会发展重点项目 (20110405) 资助
通讯作者: 张兰河,E-mail:zhanglanhe@163.com   
作者简介: 林永华,女,1964年生,副教授,研究方向为金属腐蚀与防护

引用本文:

林永华, 张雪峰, 韩利, 张兰河. 变电站接地网的防腐方法研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2013, 33(6): 501-506.
LIN Yonghua, ZHANG Xuefeng, HAN Li, ZHANG Lanhe. Comparison of Corrosion Protection Measures of Grounding Grids for Electric Power Station. Journal of Chinese Society for Corrosion and protection, 2013, 33(6): 501-506.

链接本文:

https://www.jcscp.org/CN/      或      https://www.jcscp.org/CN/Y2013/V33/I6/501

[1] Nahman J M, Jordjevic V B D. Nonuniformity correction factors for maximum Mesh and step-voltages of ground grids and combined ground electrodes [J]. IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, 1995, 10(3): 1263-1269
[2] Sverak J G. Safe substation grounding-PartII [J]. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst., 1982, l0(10): 4006-4023
[3] Zhang Q J, Yao W H, He B L, et al. Corrosion behavior of TiO2 film prepared by anodie oxidation method in simulated deep sea hydrothermal region [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Prot., 2013, 33(1): 23-28
(张勤杰, 姚文红, 贺本林等. 阳极氧化法制备TiO2膜在模拟深海热液区的耐腐蚀性能 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2013, 33(1): 23-28)
[4] Rousseau C, Baraud F, Leleyter L, et al. Cathodic protection by zinc sacrificial anodes: Impact on marine sediment metallic contamination [J]. J. Hazard. Mater., 2009, 167: 953-958
[5] El-Sayed A R, Abdel-Samad A, El-Naqier R. On the cathodic protection of thermally insulated pipelines [J]. Eng. Fail. Anal., 2009, 16: 2047-2053
[6] Jiang K K, Du Y X, Lu M X, et al. Selection of boundary conditions of anodes in numerical simulation of cathodic protection system [J]. Corros. Sci. Prot. Technol., 2013, 25(4): 287-292
(蒋卡克, 杜艳霞, 路民旭等. 阴极保护数值模拟计算中阳极边界条件选取研究 [J]. 腐蚀科学与防护技术, 2013, 25(4): 287-292)
[7] Yin P F, Zhang W, Xu Z K, et al. Impressed current cathodic protection technology of jacket platform [J]. Corros. Prot., 2012, 33(2): 18-22
(尹鹏飞, 张伟, 许征凯等. 导管架平台外加电流阴极保护技术 [J]. 腐蚀与防护, 2012, 33(2): 18-22)
[8] Wu X M, Shao X L, Xue C, et al. Effects of pH on corrosion behavior of carbon steel in oilfield water with high sulphide [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Prot., 2013, 33(2): 159-163
(吴新民, 邵秀丽, 薛晨等. pH值对碳钢在高含硫油田水中腐蚀行为的影响 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2013, 33(2): 159-163)
[9] Zhao L, Teng H K, Yang Y S. Corrosion inhibition approach of air production systems in offshore oilfields [J]. Mater. Corros., 2004, 55(9): 684-688
[10] Chouparova E, Lanzirotti A, Marinkovic N. Characterization of petroleum deposits formed in a producing well by synchrotron radiation-based microanalyses [J]. Energy Fuels, 2004, 18(4): 1199-1212
[11] Chen Z, Yu Q, Liao D H, et al. Surface activity of HR-2 stainless steel in acid solution with SECM [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Prot., 2013, 33(1): 54-60
(陈阵, 余强, 廖登辉等. 酸性介质中HR-2不锈钢表面活性的SECM 三维图像表征研究 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2013, 33(1): 54-60)
[12] Wu F F, Tian H, Wang J Q. Determination of cathodic protection parameters of grounding grid [J]. Corros. Prot., 2009, 30(7): 491-494
(吴芳芳, 田浩, 王吉庆. 接地网阴极保护中最佳保护电位的研究 [J]. 腐蚀与防护, 2009, 30(7): 491-494)
[1] 白云龙, 沈国良, 覃清钰, 韦博鑫, 于长坤, 许进, 孙成. 硫脲基咪唑啉季铵盐缓蚀剂对X80管线钢腐蚀的影响[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2021, 41(1): 60-70.
[2] 王亚婷, 王棵旭, 高鹏翔, 刘冉, 赵地顺, 翟建华, 屈冠伟. 淀粉接枝共聚物对Zn的缓蚀性能[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2021, 41(1): 131-138.
[3] 戴明杰, 刘静, 黄峰, 胡骞, 李爽. 基于正交方法研究阴极保护电位波动下X100管线钢的点蚀行为[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2020, 40(5): 425-431.
[4] 邵明鲁, 刘德新, 朱彤宇, 廖碧朝. 乌洛托品季铵盐缓蚀剂的合成与复配研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2020, 40(3): 244-250.
[5] 梁毅, 杜艳霞. 交流干扰和阴极保护协同作用下的腐蚀评判标准与机理研究进展[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2020, 40(3): 215-222.
[6] 贾巧燕, 王贝, 王赟, 张雷, 王清, 姚海元, 李清平, 路民旭. X65管线钢在油水两相界面处的CO2腐蚀行为研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2020, 40(3): 230-236.
[7] 张晨, 陆原, 赵景茂. CO2/H2S腐蚀体系中咪唑啉季铵盐与3种阳离子表面活性剂间的缓蚀协同效应[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2020, 40(3): 237-243.
[8] 解璇, 刘莉, 王福会. TiO2的制备及表面修饰工艺对其光电化学阴极保护性能的影响[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2020, 40(2): 123-130.
[9] 吕祥鸿,张晔,闫亚丽,侯娟,李健,王晨. 两种新型曼尼希碱缓蚀剂的性能及吸附行为研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2020, 40(1): 31-37.
[10] 赵书彦,童鑫红,刘福春,翁金钰,韩恩厚,郦晓慧,杨林. 环氧富锌涂层防腐蚀性能研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2019, 39(6): 563-570.
[11] 王霞,任帅飞,张代雄,蒋欢,古月. 豆粕提取物在盐酸中对Q235钢的缓蚀性能[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2019, 39(3): 267-273.
[12] 王贵容,邵亚薇,王艳秋,孟国哲,刘斌. 阴极保护电位对破损环氧涂层阴极剥离的影响[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2019, 39(3): 235-244.
[13] 廖彤,马峥,李蕾蕾,马秀敏,王秀通,侯保荣. Fe2O3/TiO2纳米复合材料对304不锈钢的光生阴极保护性能[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2019, 39(1): 36-42.
[14] 刘建国,高歌,徐亚洲,李自力,季菀然. 咪唑啉类衍生物缓蚀性能研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2018, 38(6): 523-532.
[15] 李亚琼,马景灵,王广欣,朱宇杰,宋永发,张景丽. NaPO3与SDBS缓蚀剂对AZ31镁合金空气电池在NaCl电解液中放电性能的影响[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2018, 38(6): 587-593.