Please wait a minute...
中国腐蚀与防护学报  2026, Vol. 46 Issue (4): 1081-1094     CSTR: 32134.14.1005.4537.2025.291      DOI: 10.11902/1005.4537.2025.291
  研究报告 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 |
管道内海水流动特性对碳钢阴极保护影响的试验与数值模拟研究
吴昉赟1, 乔睿鑫2, 李旭宁1, 尚浩杰1, 陆丰华1, 周澄1, 王欣1, 董亮2()
1.中核核电运行管理有限公司 嘉兴 314000
2.常州大学石油与天然气工程学院 常州 213164
Influence of Seawater Flow Characteristics Inside Pipelines on Cathodic Protection of Carbon Steel Pipelines-Experiment and Numerical Simulation
WU Fangyun1, QIAO Ruixin2, LI Xuning1, SHANG Haojie1, LU Fenghua1, ZHOU Cheng1, WANG Xin1, DONG Liang2()
1.CNNC Nuclear Power Operations Management Co. Ltd., Jiaxing 314000, China
2.School of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China
引用本文:

吴昉赟, 乔睿鑫, 李旭宁, 尚浩杰, 陆丰华, 周澄, 王欣, 董亮. 管道内海水流动特性对碳钢阴极保护影响的试验与数值模拟研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(4): 1081-1094.
Fangyun WU, Ruixin QIAO, Xuning LI, Haojie SHANG, Fenghua LU, Cheng ZHOU, Xin WANG, Liang DONG. Influence of Seawater Flow Characteristics Inside Pipelines on Cathodic Protection of Carbon Steel Pipelines-Experiment and Numerical Simulation[J]. Journal of Chinese Society for Corrosion and protection, 2026, 46(4): 1081-1094.

全文: PDF(23655 KB)   HTML
摘要: 

为研究流动海水条件下管道内碳钢的阴极极化行为,本文构建了闭式循环试验系统,并结合电化学测试与CFD模拟,对不同位置及极化电位下的电化学特性进行分析。结果表明,极化电位变化时,弯头与直管段的电流密度趋势一致,但弯头中部最易腐蚀,且外弯侧所需保护电流密度显著高于内弯侧。弯头容抗弧半径沿流动方向呈先增大后减小趋势,与电流密度变化规律相符。表面与XPS分析显示,在-1.2 V极化电位下沉积层以致密的Mg(OH)2为主,增强保护作用但增加电流消耗,与阴极反应向析氢反应转变相关。数值模拟进一步表明,近壁面径向速度与电流密度高度相关,可作为衡量流动影响的关键参数。基于此,建立了电流密度与径向速度关系模型,为流动海水环境下阴极保护系统设计与评价提供参考。

关键词 FAC阴极保护CFD流体力学弯头碳钢    
Abstract

The influence of seawater flowing inside the pipeline on the cathodic polarization behavior of carbon steel pipelines was studied viaa home-made closed-loop circulation system with electrochemical tests, meanwhile, the electrochemical behavior of different locations on the inner side of the pipeline by varying polarization potentials was analyzed by computational fluid dynamics simulation. The results show that as the polarization potential varies, the current density trends at elbows and straight sections are consistent; however, the middle region of the elbow is the most susceptible to corrosion, with the outer bend requiring a significantly higher protective current density than the inner bend. The capacitive arc radius at the elbow first increases and then decreases along the flow direction, consistent with the variation in current density. Surface morphology and XPS analyses reveal that at a polarization potential of -1.2 V, a compact Mg(OH)2 deposit forms, which enhances protection but increases current consumption due to the cathodic reaction shifting toward hydrogen evolution. Numerical simulations further demonstrate that near-wall radial velocity is highly correlated with current density and can serve as a key parameter for evaluating the influence of seawter flow on the cathodic protection effectiveness. Based on this, a relationship model between current density and radial velocity was established, providing valuable reference for the design and assessment of cathodic protection systems in flowing seawater environments.

Key wordsFAC    cathodic Protection    CFD    hydrodynamics    elbow    carbon steel
收稿日期: 2025-09-17      32134.14.1005.4537.2025.291
ZTFLH:  TG174  
通讯作者: 董 亮,E-mail:dongliang@cczu.edu.cn,研究方向为金属腐蚀与防护
Corresponding author: DONG Liang, E-mail: dongliang@cczu.edu.cn
作者简介: 吴昉赟,男,1987年生,正高级工程师
图1  试验点位置编号及几何模型示意图
图2  几何模型示意图和管段不同截面处网格示意图
图3  不同试验点的电流密度曲线图
图4  各试验点不同位置下和不同极化电位下电流密度对比图
图5  弯头下游电流密度曲线图
图6  各试验点不同位置下和不同极化电位下电流密度对比图
图7  不同试验点的的Nyquist图
图8  实验阻抗数据兼容的等效电路
Test sitePolarization potential E / VRS / Ω·cm2CPE-T / F·cm-2CPE-P / F·cm-2Rp / Ω·cm2
B1-0.714.233.121 × 10-30.657121.4
-0.814.132.284 × 10-30.786105.7
-0.914.001.348 × 10-30.752146.2
-1.015.129.473 × 10-40.843130.3
-1.115.621.043 × 10-30.774124.0
-1.217.988.996 × 10-40.774128.5
B2-0.718.742.252 × 10-30.69643.4
-0.818.742.264 × 10-30.67989.73
-0.920.132.398 × 10-30.84887.32
-1.014.991.466 × 10-30.83093.00
-1.120.609.119 × 10-40.87686.83
-1.225.567.404 × 10-40.75288.50
B3-0.712.791.104 × 10-30.64197.80
-0.812.81.326 × 10-30.70896.19
-0.911.361.246 × 10-30.78992.23
-1.011.587.838 × 10-40.74593.62
-1.112.297.675 × 10-40.73694.93
-1.216.261.147 × 10-30.72996.90
C1-0.722.371.304 × 10-30.68266.19
-0.817.441.433 × 10-30.748144.6
-0.923.741.147 × 10-30.751147.2
-1.017.781.352 × 10-30.842137.10
-1.116.759.062 × 10-40.849135.6
-1.222.371.304 × 10-30.682133.5
C2-0.715.511.794 × 10-30.57369.12
-0.815.41.912 × 10-30.634113.2
-0.916.551.640 × 10-30.817101.2
-1.014.488.132 × 10-40.795120.1
-1.114.149.012 × 10-40.681116.7
-1.229.347.146 × 10-40.988108.4
C3-0.77.542.350 × 10-30.69042.32
-0.87.732.077 × 10-30.771100.1
-0.97.841.666 × 10-30.783102.7
-1.08.441.015 × 10-30.904101.6
-1.17.769.915 × 10-40.723104.8
-1.29.591.929 × 10-30.656125.4
表1  弯头不同位置处20#碳钢阻抗数据
图9  弯头处不同位置处20#碳钢极化电阻随阴极极化电位的变化曲线图
图10  弯头内侧C1、C2、C3位置处试样及弯头外侧B1、B2、B3位置处试样表面形貌
图11  弯头下游20#碳钢的Nyquist图
图12  弯头下游2D、4D位置处20#碳钢表面形貌
ElementMass fraction / %Atomic fraction / %
C14.7521.68
O45.5750.29
Ca2.791.23
Mg36.8926.80
表2  XPS定量分析
图13  弯头试验段标注
图14  管道各截面流速,弯头及上下游截面的速度和弯头及上下游截面湍流动能分布
图15  弯头不同位置处表面剪切力与电流密度对比
图16  弯头不同位置处TKE与电流密度对比
图17  弯头不同位置处涡流强度与电流密度对比
图18  弯头不同位置处轴向速度与电流密度对比
图19  弯头不同位置处近壁面径向速度与电流密度对比
图20  不同极化电位下电流密度与径向速率拟合关系
[1] Li Y, Chen M D, Li J K, et al. Flow-accelerated corrosion behavior of 13Cr stainless steel in a wet gas environment containing CO2 [J]. Int. J. Miner., Metall. Mater., 2018, 25: 779
[2] Yoneda K, Uchiyama Y, Morita R, et al. Prediction of flow-accelerated corrosion in single/dual elbow in pipelines considering geometric parameters and layout effect [J]. Mech. Eng. J., 2023, 10: 22-00344
[3] Ozawa M, Akashi M. Corrosion behavior of carbon steel pipe in environments in which seawater and/or the fresh water was injected [J]. Corros. Eng., 2016, 65: 154
[4] Gong Y, Ma F Q, Xue Y, et al. Failure analysis on leaked titanium tubes of seawater heat exchangers in recirculating cooling water system of coastal nuclear power plant [J]. Eng. Failure Anal., 2019, 101: 172
doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.03.018
[5] Moon S, Lee J Y, Kim K M, et al. Hydrodynamic parameters affecting flow-accelerated corrosion in elbows [J]. Nucl. Eng. Technol., 2025, 57: 103293
doi: 10.1016/j.net.2024.10.055
[6] Yan Z X, Wang L D, Zhang P J, et al. Failure analysis of Erosion-Corrosion of the bend pipe at sewage stripping units [J]. Eng. Failure Anal., 2021, 129: 105675
doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105675
[7] Wang H, Li Z H, Zhang Z M, et al. The relationship between the flow velocity of freshwater and the corrosion performance of steel pipe elbow sections in water resource allocation engineering [J]. J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2023, 32: 4941
doi: 10.1007/s11665-022-07432-w
[8] Si X D, Si H T, Li M Y, et al. Investigation of corrosion behavior at elbow by array electrode and computational fluid dynamics simulation [J]. Mater. Corros., 2020, 71: 1637
[9] Pan D L, Si X D, Lv J H. Effect of flow velocity on flow accelerated corrosion rate of carbon steel elbow [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Prot., 2023, 43: 1064
[9] 潘代龙, 司晓东, 吕金洪. 流速对碳钢弯管段流动加速腐蚀速率的影响 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2023, 43: 1064
doi: 10.11902/1005.4537.2022.319
[10] Xu T, Zhan R, Si X D. Effects of fluid dynamics parameters on flow-accelerated corrosion at elbow of carbon steel pipeline [J]. Mater. Res. Express, 2024, 11: 056520
[11] Zhang G A, Zeng L, Huang H L, et al. A study of flow accelerated corrosion at elbow of carbon steel pipeline by array electrode and computational fluid dynamics simulation [J]. Corros. Sci., 2013, 77: 334
doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2013.08.022
[12] Rani H P, Divya T, Sahaya R R, et al. CFD study of flow accelerated corrosion in 3D elbows [J]. Ann. Nucl. Energy, 2014, 69: 344
doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2014.01.031
[13] Oh S B, Kim J, Lee J Y, et al. Analysis of pipe thickness reduction according to pH in FAC facility with In situ ultrasonic measurement real time monitoring [J]. Nucl. Eng. Technol., 2022, 54: 186
doi: 10.1016/j.net.2021.07.048
[14] Zhou H, Zhang Y, Ma H Y, et al. Inhibition of the erosion-corrosion of elbow by synergistic action of swirling flow and inhibitor [J]. Wear, 2023, 514-515: 204570
doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2022.204570
[15] Li X D, Liu C H, Zhang C, et al. Electrodeposition and performance of WC-Zn composite coatings on Q235 carbon steel [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Prot., 2025, 45: 795
[15] 李祥东, 刘昌昊, 张 弛 等. WC-Zn复合镀层的工艺设计及其性能研究 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45: 795
doi: 10.11902/1005.4537.2024.131
[16] Li C C, He R B, Chen Y L, et al. Corrosion behavior of X65 steel by AC interference and cathodic protection [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Prot., 2023, 43: 179
[16] 李长春, 何仁碧, 陈以龙 等. 交流干扰与阴极保护共同作用对X65管线钢的腐蚀行为研究 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2023, 43: 179
doi: 10.11902/1005.4537.2022.016
[17] Refait P, Grolleau A M, Jeannin M, et al. Cathodic protection of complex carbon steel structures in seawater [J]. Corros. Mater. Degrad., 2022, 3: 439
doi: 10.3390/cmd3030026
[18] Feng P P, Wan K, Cai G W, et al. Synergistic protective effect of carboxymethyl chitosan and cathodic protection of X70 pipeline steel in seawater [J]. RSC Adv., 2017, 7: 3419
doi: 10.1039/C6RA25310E
[19] Oltra R. Mass transport control of localised corrosion processes: in situ local probing and modelling [J]. Corros. Eng., Sci. Technol., 2018, 53(suppl.1) : 2
[20] Singh V, Kumar S, Mohapatra S K. Modeling of erosion wear of sand water slurry flow through pipe bend using CFD [J]. J. Appl. Fluid Mech., 2019, 12: 679
doi: 10.29252/jafm.12.03.29199
[21] Mansouri A, Binali A E, Khan N, et al. Three-dimensional modeling of in-ground cathodic protection systems with deforming anodes [J]. Sci. Rep., 2021, 11: 1894
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81184-w pmid: 33479341
[1] 魏旭光, 王维斌, 李康, 张灿灿, 吴玉庭, 鹿院卫, 王国强, 赵博. Q345R碳钢在Hitec高温熔盐中动态腐蚀特性实验对比研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(3): 693-702.
[2] 王蝶, 杜宝帅, 贾泽阳, 樊志彬, 姜波, 高瑾, 杜翠薇. 富锌涂料中锌粉形态对涂层阴极保护性能和机理的影响研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(3): 938-944.
[3] 汪崧, 刘学武, 赵健, 李众, 杨吉可. 金银花植物提取物作为环保型缓蚀剂对低碳钢酸性溶液腐蚀的缓蚀效果[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(2): 541-548.
[4] 胡宗武, 刘建国, 王钰, 李楷. 含砂3.5%NaCl溶液中90°弯管冲刷腐蚀损伤机制研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(2): 611-619.
[5] 庄宁, 曾易, 欧阳正平, 许金荣, 李翰泽, 宋霄锟, 王亚洲. 海洋环境下钢筋混凝土桩基的腐蚀与阴极保护特征分析[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(1): 273-282.
[6] 岳远广, 尹志彪, 张子月, 江社明, 张启富. 一种大气腐蚀实时监测装置的开发及其在不同环境中的应用[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(1): 308-314.
[7] 李兆南, 侯禹岑, 莒鹏, 庄铁钢, 陈景杰, 王明昱, 徐云泽. 模拟液滴电导率变化对碳钢大气腐蚀的影响机制研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45(6): 1537-1548.
[8] 王得, 张璠, 王兴奇, 张贺新, 赵成志, 杨延格. 单组分氟碳改性环氧涂层对碳钢和铝合金长期防腐性能的对比研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45(6): 1549-1562.
[9] 闫冲冲, 谢光明, 华剑, 曾云, 周思柱, 余泽坤. 非圆弯头冲蚀磨损数值模拟[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45(5): 1425-1432.
[10] 郑中逸, 冯毅翔, 宋沁峰, 甘甜思雨, 苑旺, 董亮. 转动条件下Q345B钢在人工海水中阴极保护效果试验研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45(4): 927-938.
[11] 彭立园, 谢敬礼, 曹胜飞, 谭季波, 吴欣强, 张兹瑜. 日本高放废物处置容器腐蚀厚度设计研究进展[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45(3): 563-576.
[12] 肖琦琨, 马军, 郭凯, 熊新, 袁浩然. 基于DDPM-RSM的浆体管道冲蚀磨损数值模拟研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45(3): 709-719.
[13] 侯晓犇, 刘宁, 扈俊颖. 天然气集输倾斜管道腐蚀行为及缓蚀剂分布研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45(3): 780-786.
[14] 李新城, 李兆南, 王海锋, 徐云泽, 王明昱, 甄兴伟. DH36海洋工程钢焊接结构的氢脆敏感性研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45(2): 416-422.
[15] 于佳汇, 王彤彤, 高云, 高荣杰. Bi2S3/TiO2 纳米复合材料的制备及其对304不锈钢的光生阴极保护性能研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2024, 44(4): 901-908.