Please wait a minute...
Journal of Chinese Society for Corrosion and protection  2026, Vol. 46 Issue (3): 680-692    DOI: 10.11902/1005.4537.2025.237
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Influence of Concrete Counterweight Layer on Cathodic Protection Effect of Nearshore Submarine Steel Pipes
WANG Mengmeng1, CAO Guomin1, MENG Fanxing1, LI Tianliang2, SONG Qinfeng2, SHAN Taihang2, DONG Liang2()
1.PipeChina Eastern Crude Oil Storage and Transportation Co. Ltd., Xuzhou 221008, China
2.School of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China
Cite this article: 

WANG Mengmeng, CAO Guomin, MENG Fanxing, LI Tianliang, SONG Qinfeng, SHAN Taihang, DONG Liang. Influence of Concrete Counterweight Layer on Cathodic Protection Effect of Nearshore Submarine Steel Pipes. Journal of Chinese Society for Corrosion and protection, 2026, 46(3): 680-692.

Download:  HTML  PDF(5108KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

The cathodic polarization behavior of X60 steel bar without and with concrete counterweight layer in static and flowing artificial seawater of different salinities (5‰, 16.8‰, 26.7‰) and real mud, the later was tokened from the Hangzhou bay coastal wetlands, was assessed via steady-state constant potential polarization, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), and numerical simulation methods, aiming to understand the effect of concrete counterweight layer on the cathodic protection of submarine pipes in nearshore marine environments. Meanwhile, the resistivity of the concrete weighted layer was also measured, and the cathodic protection potential distribution and sacrificial anode output current of the pipe in the presence of the concrete weighted layer were obtained. The results showed that when the polarization potential was reached -0.85 V (CSE) in static seawater of salinities of 5‰, 16.8‰, and 26.7‰, as well as sea mud, the cathodic polarization current density required for the bare X60 steel was about 3.5-8 times that required for X60 steel with a concrete counterweight layer. In 2 m/s flowing seawater, the difference in cathodic polarization current density required for X60 steel with concrete counterweight layer by the corresponding potential is relatively small compared to that in static seawater. The flow velocity will significantly increase the cathodic polarization current density required for bare X60 steel, which is related to the increased oxygen diffusion and the destruction of calcium deposition layer due to the increased flow velocity. While the concrete counterweight layer hinders this effect of flow velocity. The change in polarization resistance measured by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy is consistent with the change in polarization current density. At the same time, the resistivity of the concrete counterweight layer in seawater is about 70 times that of the corresponding seawater resistivity, and the resistivity of the concrete counterweight layer in marine mud is about 37 times that of the corresponding marine mud resistivity. The numerical simulation results show that the concrete counterweight layer reduces the cathodic polarization current density, resulting in a significant negative shift and small potential attenuation of the cathodic protection potential. The concrete counterweight layer reduces the output current of the sacrificial anode, resulting in a slightly positive shift of the cathodic protection potential. In a word, the concrete weighted layer has a significant effect on the improvement of the cathodic protection effectiveness of submarine pipes.

Key words:  X60 steel      concrete counterweight layer      cathodic polarization      electrochemical impedance spectroscopy      nearshore marine environment      numerical simulation     
Received:  28 July 2025      32134.14.1005.4537.2025.237
ZTFLH:  TG172  
Fund: PipeChina Project(AQWH202206)
Corresponding Authors:  DONG Liang, E-mail: dongliang@cczu.edu.cn

URL: 

https://www.jcscp.org/EN/10.11902/1005.4537.2025.237     OR     https://www.jcscp.org/EN/Y2026/V46/I3/680

Chemicals5‰ salinity seawater16.8‰ salinity seawater26.7‰ salinity seawaterSea mud
NaCl2.80110.30517.780
CaCl2·2H2O0.2820.6321.048
MgCl2·6H2O1.1584.2487.909
NaHCO30.1650.1600.147On-site sampling
Na2SO40.4951.1950.024
KCl0.0650.2540.479
KBr0.0790.0600.060
NaF0.0540.2540.024
Table 1  Chemical composition of artificial seawaters with different salinities
Fig.1  Electrochemical testing device under flow seawater condition
Fig.2  Numerical simulation area and boundary diagrams of sacrificial anode CP for submarine pip-elines without (a) and with (b) weighted concrete
Fig.3  Geometric model and mesh division of sacrificial anode CP for submarine pipelines: (a) concrete weighted X60, (b) bare X60 steel
Case No.Marine environmentConcrete weighted environmentCoating breakdown factor
EnvironmentResistivity / Ω·mConcreteResistivity / Ω·m
126.7‰ salinity seawater1.189No-6%
2Yes43.864
3Yes43.864
4Mud0.250No-
5Yes17.880
6Yes17.880
Table 2  Numerical simulation case setting
Fig.4  I-t curve of concrete weighted X60 steel in static environment: (a) 5‰ salinity seawater, (b) 16.8‰ salinity seawater, (c) 26.7‰ salinity seawater, (d) sea mud
5‰ salinity seawater16.8‰ salinity seawater26.7‰ salinity seawaterSea mud
Ep, CSE / mVI / mA·m-2Ep, CSE / mVI / mA·m-2Ep, CSE / mVI / mA·m-2Ep, CSE / mVI / mA·m-2
-5740-5910-6040-5620
-86723.428-83442.341-86856.427-82916.338
-94526.204-88073.960-94777.533-89618.221
-101136.321-978103.107-1019169.121-101024.073
-106852.883-1076173.679-1081228.427-108134.603
-112075.333-1151239.587-1149316.116-110450.578
-1154102.461-1201311.849-1221396.476-116791.378
Table 3  Steady-state polarization data of concrete weighted X60 steel in static environment
Fig.5  I-t curve of bare X60 steel in static environment: (a) 5‰ salinity seawater, (b) 16.8‰ salinity seawater, (c) 26.7‰ salinity seawater, (d) sea mud
Fig.6  Steady state polarization curve of X60 steel in static environment: (a) concrete weighted X60, (b) bare X60 steel
Fig.7  I-t curves of bare X60 steel and concrete weighted X60 steel in 2 m/s seawater: (a) bare X60 steel, (b) concrete weighted X60
MaterialECSE / mVEp, CSE / mVI / mA·m-2
X60 steel-854-8502195
-924-9202168
-1024-10202372
-1124-11054555
-1224-11639385
-1324-121134118
Concrete weighted-854-81645
X60 steel-924-88559
-1024-984110
-1124-1082163
-1224-1174189
-1324-1212352
Table 4  Polarization data of bare X60 steel and concrete weighted X60 steel at 2 m/s sea water
Fig.8  Steady-state polarization curves of bare X60 steel and concrete weighted X60 steel in 0 m/s and 2 m/s seawater
Fig.9  Nyquist diagram of concrete weighted X60 steel layer in static environment: (a) 5‰ salinity seawater, (b) 16.8‰ salinity seawater, (c) 26.7‰ salinity seawater, (d) sea mud
Fig.10  Equivalent circuit diagram of impedance in static environment: (a) bare X60 steel, (b) concrete weighted X60
EnvironmentEp, CSE / mVRs / Ω·cm2Cc / F·cm-2Rc / Ω·cm2Cdl / F·cm-2Rp / Ω·cm2
5‰ salinity seawater-806850.31.523 × 10-9206852.051 × 10-441341
-867761.61.526 × 10-9204182.819 × 10-444493
-945813.31.490 × 10-9205133.842 × 10-421283
-1011817.41.488 × 10-9204154.401 × 10-416398
-1068839.11.444 × 10-9202614.103 × 10-414555
-1120875.81.436 × 10-9202303.992 × 10-411554
-1154861.71.479 × 10-9205585.117 × 10-48124
16.8‰ salinity seawater-811220.41.220 × 10-985571.769 × 10-410295
-834490.81.270 × 10-980332.511 × 10-48168
-880319.41.284 × 10-975274.613 × 10-45472
-978210.91.225 × 10-972246.221 × 10-42594
-1076524.11.255 × 10-967914.856 × 10-41640
-1151311.11.181 × 10-964561.032 × 10-31709
-1201510.51.227 × 10-963609.296 × 10-42899
26.7‰ salinity seawater-822574.31.121 × 10-944986.686 × 10-43231
-868562.11.120 × 10-944761.061 × 10-32268
-947581.31.091 × 10-944531.307 × 10-31364
-1019575.81.097 × 10-944181.316 × 10-41036
-10815751.114 × 10-944168.392 × 10-42507
-1149557.91.132 × 10-945286.801 × 10-42155
-1221539.51.158 × 10-945064.529 × 10-41805
Sea mud-7891551.299 × 10-9104012.297 × 10-416877
-8291651.285 × 10-9107793.276 × 10-414086
-896133.71.276 × 10-9111614.821 × 10-410706
-1010154.91.283 × 10-9113206.745 × 10-48185
-108190.581.260 × 10-9114317.529 × 10-46803
-1104160.51.290 × 10-9109415.513 × 10-45293
-1167133.51.259 × 10-9109424.209 × 10-43600
Table 5  Impedance fitting parameters of concrete weighted X60 steel in static environment
EnvironmentAverage resistance Rc / Ω·cm2Concrete resistivity ρc / Ω·mEnvironment resistivity ρs / Ω·m
5‰ salinity seawater2044081.7601.136
16.8‰ salinity seawater727829.1120.448
26.7‰ salinity seawater447017.8800.250
Sea mud1099643.8641.189
Table 6  Resistivities of concrete counterweight layers and environments in different environments
Fig.11  E-Rp curves of concrete weighted X60 steel in static environment
Fig.12  Impedance Nyquist plot of bare X60 (a) steel and concreted weighted X60 steel (b) in 2 m/s seawater
MaterialEp, CSE / mVRs / Ω·cm2Cc / F·cm-2Rc / Ω·cm2Cdl / F·cm-2Rp / Ω·cm2
Bare X60 steel-8506.718--1.457 × 10-33110
-9206.202--1.104 × 10-33231
-10206.327--1.326 × 10-3504.5
-11057.49--1.246 × 10-3162.5
-11639.421--7.838 × 10-465.81
-121110.2--7.675 × 10-423.33
Concrete weighted X60 steel-816378.51.382 × 10-954677.200 × 10-43425
-885472.61.295 × 10-951998.680 × 10-43042
-984454.41.422 × 10-951271.040 × 10-32472
-1082439.61.240 × 10-950279.610 × 10-42229
-1174399.81.441 × 10-949567.310 × 10-42002
-12123731.310 × 10-949302.060 × 10-41928
Table 7  Steel impedance fitting data of bare X60 steel and concrete weighted X60 steel in 2 m/s seawater
Fig.13  EP-Rp curves of bare X60 steel and concrete weighted X60 steel in 0 m/s and 2 m/s seawater
Fig.14  Simulation results of the influence of concrete counterweight layer on pipe potential distribution: (a) in seawater, (b) in marine mud
Case No.Pipe potential rangeE / mVAnode output current / mA
1-830--9697513
2-977--10232470
3-962--9962069
4-851--9751444
5-983--1026470
6-969--1010458
Table 8  Simulation results of pipe potential and sacrificial anode output current of cases
[1] Azam M A, Sukarti S, Zaimi M. Corrosion behavior of API-5L-X42 petroleum/natural gas pipeline steel in South China Sea and Strait of Melaka seawaters [J]. Eng. Fail. Anal., 2020, 115: 104654
doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104654
[2] Xu Y Z, Zhang Q L, Gao S, et al. Exploring the effects of sand impacts and anodic dissolution on localized erosion-corrosion in sand entraining electrolyte [J]. Wear, 2021, 478-479: 203907
doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2021.203907
[3] Zhu W H, Sun D X, Xie F, et al. Effects of corrosion defect growth on submarine pipeline under operating pressure and axial displacement [J]. Ocean Eng., 2023, 267: 113297
doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113297
[4] Zang Z P, Xu Z, Zou X, et al. Deformation response of a submarine pipeline with rock berm + concrete mattress protection subjected to impact by a dropping anchor [J]. Ocean Eng., 2023, 41(4): 114
臧志鹏, 许 振, 邹 星 等. 块石和混凝土排垫保护下海底管道落锚撞击变形响应研究 [J]. 海洋工程, 2023, 41(4): 114
[5] Cao G M. External corrosion control method of hangzhou bay submarine crude oil pipeline [J]. Corros. Protect., 2023, 44(7): 117
曹国民. 杭州湾海底原油管道的外腐蚀控制方法 [J]. 腐蚀与防护, 2023, 44(7): 117
[6] Liu R, Song Y S, Cui Y, et al. Corrosion of high-strength steel in 3.5%NaCl solution under hydrostatic pressure: Understanding electrochemical corrosion with tensile stress coupling [J]. Corros. Sci., 2023, 219: 111204
doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2023.111204
[7] Pei Y Y, Guan F, Dong X C, et al. Effect of Desulfovibrio Bizertensis SY-1 on corrosive behavior of metal materials under cathodic polarization [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Protect., 2024, 44: 345
裴莹莹, 管 方, 董续成 等. Desulfovibrio Bizertensis SY-1在阴极极化条件下对X70管线钢的腐蚀行为研究 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2024, 44: 345
doi: 10.11902/1005.4537.2023.074
[8] Liu G. Discussion on DC voltage gradient (DCVG) measurement and %IR calculation of buried coating pipeline [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Protect., 2024, 44: 512
刘 国. 关于埋地防腐层管道直流电位梯度(DCVG)测量与%IR计算的讨论 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2024, 44: 512
[9] Li C J, Du M. Research and development of cathodic protection for steels in deep seawater [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Protect., 2013, 33: 10
李成杰, 杜 敏. 深海钢铁材料的阴极保护技术研究及发展 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2013, 33: 10
[10] Wang L L, Wu J, Zhang T. Underwater cutting and removal of subsea pipeline concrete counterweight layer and anticorrosion coating by high-pressure water jet in complex sea area [J]. Petrol. Eng. Constr., 2021, 47(3): 27
王立领, 吴 军, 张 涛. 复杂海域海底管道混凝土配重及防腐层高压水射流水下切割清除施工技术 [J]. 石油工程建设, 2021, 47(3): 27
[11] Li X H, Chen G M, Zhu H W. Quantitative risk analysis on leakage failure of submarine oil and gas pipelines using Bayesian network [J]. Process Safety Environ. Protect. 2016, 103: 163
doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2016.06.006
[12] Miao X Y, Zhao H. Corroded submarine pipeline degradation prediction based on theory-guided IMOSOA-EL model [J]. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety, 2024, 243: 109902
doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109902
[13] Tan J H, Wang S Q, Zhang S T, et al. Electric field calculation of pipe with cathodic protection in seawater by BEM [J]. Appl. Mech. Mater., 2014, 621: 230
doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.621
[14] Hou J, Gao Y, Wei W R. The research and application of numerical simulation evaluation technology for cathodic protection system of the subsea pipeline in a gas field of South China Sea [A]. The 28th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference [C]. Sapporo, Japan, 2018
[15] Marcassoli P, Bonetti A, Lazzari L, et al. Modeling of potential distribution of subsea pipeline under cathodic protection by finite element method [J]. Mater. Corros., 2015, 66: 619
[16] Kiselev V, Kalyutik A, Rouzich E. Influence of the soil electrical conductivity in the area of the underground pipeline on energy efficiency of the cathodic protection [J]. MATEC Web of Conf., 2018, 245: 07015
[17] Kang W W. The study on the cathodic protection and hydrogen permeation of X65 pipeline steel under the condition of flowing seawater [D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2018
康蔚蔚. 流动海水条件下X65管线钢的阴极保护及氢渗透行为研究 [D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2018
[18] Fan F Q, Song J W, Li C J, et al. Effect of flow velocity on cathodic protection of DH36 steel in seawater [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Protect., 2014, 34: 550
范丰钦, 宋积文, 李成杰 等. 海水流速对DH36平台钢阴极保护的影响 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2014, 34: 550
doi: 10.11902/1005.4537.2013.183
[19] Ji T W, Wang S L, Cai Z, et al. Influence of seawater flow rate on the polarization curve of X80 pipeline steel [J]. Oil-Gas Field Surf. Eng., 2018, 37(6): 64
季廷伟, 王树立, 才 政 等. 海水流速对X80管线钢极化曲线的影响 [J]. 油气田地面工程, 2018, 37(6): 64
[20] Zhang G Y, Tian Y, Liu Y, et al. Dynamic electrochemical model of steel corrosion in concrete microenvironment under multifield action of heat-moisture-chlorine [J]. J. Mater. Civil Eng., 2024, 36: 04023507
[21] Hornbostel K, Larsen C K, Geiker M R. Relationship between concrete resistivity and corrosion rate-A literature review [J]. Cem. Concr. Compos., 2013, 39: 60
doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.03.019
[22] Brenna A, Beretta S, Uglietti R, et al. Cathodic protection monitoring of buried carbon steel pipeline: Measurement and interpretation of instant-off potential [J]. Corros. Eng. Sci. Technol., 2017, 52: 253
doi: 10.1080/1478422X.2016.1262096
[23] Angst U, Büchler M, Martin B, et al. Cathodic protection of soil buried steel pipelines-a critical discussion of protection criteria and threshold values [J]. Mater. Corros., 2016, 67: 1135
[24] Kou J, Ren Z. Research progress of regional cathodic protection potential distribution of tank floor based on numerical calculation [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Protect., 2023, 43: 871
寇 杰, 任 哲. 基于数值计算的罐底板阴极保护电位分布研究进展与展望 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2023, 43: 871
[25] Googan C. The cathodic protection potential criteria: Evaluation of the evidence [J]. Mater. Corros., 2021, 72: 446
doi: 10.1002/maco.202011978
[26] Huang A L, Chen Q, Xie L J, et al. EIS based assessment of electrodeposition effect of concrete cracks: Experiment and equivalent model [J]. Constr. Build. Mater., 2023, 377: 131080
doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131080
[27] Li Z L, Shang X B, Huang J D, et al. Electric circuit design in EIS for metal corrosion system with coating defects [J]. Corros. Protect., 2013, 34: 52
李自力, 尚兴彬, 黄敬东 等. 带涂层缺陷金属EIS研究中等效电路的设计 [J]. 腐蚀与防护, 2013, 34: 52
[28] Xiong X L, Yang H C, Zhang N, et al. Combined effect of cathodic potential and calcareous deposits on hydrogen evolution and permeation in Q460 steel [J]. Inter. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 79: 1227
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.07.118
[29] Zheng Z Y, Feng Y X, Song Q F, et al. Effectiveness of cathodic protection on rotating test-piece of Q345B steel in artificial seawater [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Protect., 2025, 45: 927
郑中逸, 冯毅翔, 宋沁峰 等. 转动条件下Q345B钢在人工海水中阴极保护效果试验研究 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45: 927
doi: 10.11902/1005.4537.2024.285
[1] ZHOU Xiaobao, WANG Ziteng, REN Yanjie, DONG Shaoyang, GAN Lang, LI Cong. Hot Corrosion Behavior of CoCrNi Medium-entropy Alloys Fabricated by Laser Powder Bed Fusion[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(1): 115-125.
[2] ZHUANG Ning, ZENG Yi, OUYANG Zhengping, XU Jinrong, LI Hanze, SONG Xiaokun, WANG Yazhou. Analysis of Corrosion and Cathodic Protection Characteristics of Reinforced Concrete Pile in Simulated Marine Environments[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(1): 273-282.
[3] WANG De, ZHANG Fan, WANG Xingqi, ZHANG Hexin, ZHAO Chengzhi, YANG Yange. Long-term Corrosion Resistance of Carbon Steel and Al-alloy with Single Component Fluorocarbon Modified Epoxy Coating[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45(6): 1549-1562.
[4] XIANG Qifeng, ZHAO Yang, ZHANG Tao, WANG Fuhui. Influence of Cathodic Polarization on Hydrogen Embrittlement Susceptibility of 10CrNi5MoV Steel in Simulated Shallow-sea and Deep-sea Environment[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45(6): 1599-1609.
[5] XIA Da-Hai, PAN Chengcheng, GUO Yujie, HU Wenbin, TRIBOLLET Bernard. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy Analysis on Interface State and Corrosion Mechanism of 7050 Al-alloy Subjected to Cavitation Erosion in NaCl Solution[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45(5): 1196-1204.
[6] GUO Zihan, FAN Jianchun, YANG Yunpeng, ZHANG Jun, DAI Siwei. Erosion Characteristics of High-pressure Tee Manifold Under Dynamic Load[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45(3): 698-708.
[7] XIAO Qikun, MA Jun, GUO Kai, XIONG Xin, YUAN Haoran. Numerical Simulation of Erosion Wear in Slurry Pipeline Based on DDPM-RSM[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45(3): 709-719.
[8] TANG Yixin, ZHANG Fei, CUI Zhongyu, CUI Hongzhi, LI Yizhou. Effect of Hydrogen on Crevice Corrosion Behavior of 2205 Duplex Stainless Steel in 3.5%NaCl Solution[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45(2): 431-437.
[9] WANG Tiancong, ZHAO Dongyang, XIANG Xueyun, WU Hang, WANG Wen. Degradation Behavior of an Epoxy Corrosion-resistant Coating in NaCl Solution[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2024, 44(5): 1361-1369.
[10] LIU Zhe, DENG Chengman, WEI Junsheng, XIA Da-Hai. Fast Evaluation of Resistance to High Temperature Steam Sterilization Process for Organic Coating Coated Tinplate by Electrochemical Method[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2024, 44(4): 883-890.
[11] FU Jiangyue, GUO Jianxi, YANG Yange, LENG Zhe, WANG Wen. Erosion-corrosion Behavior of a High Strength Low Alloy Steel in Flowing 3.5%NaCl Solution[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2024, 44(3): 585-600.
[12] LI Zhuoxuan, CAO Yanhui, LI Chongjie, LI Hui, ZHANG Xiaoming, YONG Xingyue. Relationship Between Corrosion Failure Degree of Organic Coatings and Mechanical Properties for Dissimilar Metal Assamblies[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2024, 44(3): 679-690.
[13] PEI Yingying, GUAN Fang, DONG Xucheng, ZHANG Ruiyong, DUAN Jizhou, HOU Baorong. Effect of Desulfovibrio Bizertensis SY-1 on Corrosive Behavior of Metal Materials Under Cathodic Polarization[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2024, 44(2): 345-354.
[14] ZHAO Guoxian, LIU Ranran, DING Langyong, ZHANG Siqi, GUO Menglong, WANG Yingchao. Effect of Temperature on CO2-inducedCorrosion Behavior of 5Cr Steel in a Simulated Oilfield Produced High-temperature and High-pressured Water[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2024, 44(1): 175-186.
[15] PAN Dailong, SI Xiaodong, LV Jinhong. Effect of Flow Velocity on Flow Accelerated Corrosion Rate of Carbon Steel Elbow[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2023, 43(5): 1064-1070.
No Suggested Reading articles found!