Please wait a minute...
中国腐蚀与防护学报  2026, Vol. 46 Issue (3): 680-692     CSTR: 32134.14.1005.4537.2025.237      DOI: 10.11902/1005.4537.2025.237
  研究报告 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 |
混凝土配重层对近海海底钢质管道阴极保护效果的影响
王萌萌1, 曹国民1, 孟繁兴1, 李天亮2, 宋沁峰2, 单太航2, 董亮2()
1.国家管网集团东部原油储运有限公司 徐州 221008
2.常州大学石油与天然气工程学院 常州 213164
Influence of Concrete Counterweight Layer on Cathodic Protection Effect of Nearshore Submarine Steel Pipes
WANG Mengmeng1, CAO Guomin1, MENG Fanxing1, LI Tianliang2, SONG Qinfeng2, SHAN Taihang2, DONG Liang2()
1.PipeChina Eastern Crude Oil Storage and Transportation Co. Ltd., Xuzhou 221008, China
2.School of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China
引用本文:

王萌萌, 曹国民, 孟繁兴, 李天亮, 宋沁峰, 单太航, 董亮. 混凝土配重层对近海海底钢质管道阴极保护效果的影响[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(3): 680-692.
Mengmeng WANG, Guomin CAO, Fanxing MENG, Tianliang LI, Qinfeng SONG, Taihang SHAN, Liang DONG. Influence of Concrete Counterweight Layer on Cathodic Protection Effect of Nearshore Submarine Steel Pipes[J]. Journal of Chinese Society for Corrosion and protection, 2026, 46(3): 680-692.

全文: PDF(5108 KB)   HTML
摘要: 

为探究混凝土配重层对近海海洋环境中的海底管道阴极保护效果的影响,采用稳态恒电位极化、电化学阻抗谱(EIS)和数值模拟计算方法,系统研究了X60裸钢和带混凝土配重层的X60钢在不同盐度(盐度5‰、16.8‰、26.7‰)静态海水和海泥以及2 m/s流动海水的阴极极化行为,并测试了混凝土配重层电阻率,获得了混凝土配重层影响下的管道阴极保护电位分布和牺牲阳极输出电流。结果表明,在5‰、16.8‰、26.7‰盐度的静态海水和海泥中达到-0.85 V (CSE)极化电位时,X60裸钢所需的阴极极化电流密度约为带混凝土配重层的X60钢所需的3.5~8倍。在2 m/s流动海水中,对应电位下带混凝土配重层的X60钢所需的阴极极化电流密度与在静态海水中差异相对较小,流速会明显提升X60裸钢所需的阴极极化电流密度,这与流速增大氧的扩散和破坏钙质沉积层有关,而混凝土配重层阻碍了流速的这种影响。电化学阻抗谱测得的极化电阻的变化与极化电流密度的变化规律一致,同时获得的海水中混凝土配重层电阻率约为对应海水电阻率的70倍,海泥中混凝土配重层电阻率约为对应海泥电阻率的37倍。数值模拟结果显示,混凝土配重层降低阴极极化电流密度使得阴极保护电位负移明显且电位衰减小,混凝土配重层电阻率降低了牺牲阳极的输出电流而使得阴极保护电位稍正移。混凝土配重层对于改善海底管道阴极保护效果作用明显。

关键词 X60钢混凝土配重层阴极极化电化学阻抗谱近海海洋环境数值模拟    
Abstract

The cathodic polarization behavior of X60 steel bar without and with concrete counterweight layer in static and flowing artificial seawater of different salinities (5‰, 16.8‰, 26.7‰) and real mud, the later was tokened from the Hangzhou bay coastal wetlands, was assessed via steady-state constant potential polarization, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), and numerical simulation methods, aiming to understand the effect of concrete counterweight layer on the cathodic protection of submarine pipes in nearshore marine environments. Meanwhile, the resistivity of the concrete weighted layer was also measured, and the cathodic protection potential distribution and sacrificial anode output current of the pipe in the presence of the concrete weighted layer were obtained. The results showed that when the polarization potential was reached -0.85 V (CSE) in static seawater of salinities of 5‰, 16.8‰, and 26.7‰, as well as sea mud, the cathodic polarization current density required for the bare X60 steel was about 3.5-8 times that required for X60 steel with a concrete counterweight layer. In 2 m/s flowing seawater, the difference in cathodic polarization current density required for X60 steel with concrete counterweight layer by the corresponding potential is relatively small compared to that in static seawater. The flow velocity will significantly increase the cathodic polarization current density required for bare X60 steel, which is related to the increased oxygen diffusion and the destruction of calcium deposition layer due to the increased flow velocity. While the concrete counterweight layer hinders this effect of flow velocity. The change in polarization resistance measured by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy is consistent with the change in polarization current density. At the same time, the resistivity of the concrete counterweight layer in seawater is about 70 times that of the corresponding seawater resistivity, and the resistivity of the concrete counterweight layer in marine mud is about 37 times that of the corresponding marine mud resistivity. The numerical simulation results show that the concrete counterweight layer reduces the cathodic polarization current density, resulting in a significant negative shift and small potential attenuation of the cathodic protection potential. The concrete counterweight layer reduces the output current of the sacrificial anode, resulting in a slightly positive shift of the cathodic protection potential. In a word, the concrete weighted layer has a significant effect on the improvement of the cathodic protection effectiveness of submarine pipes.

Key wordsX60 steel    concrete counterweight layer    cathodic polarization    electrochemical impedance spectroscopy    nearshore marine environment    numerical simulation
收稿日期: 2025-07-28      32134.14.1005.4537.2025.237
ZTFLH:  TG172  
基金资助:国家管网集团项目(AQWH202206)
通讯作者: 董 亮,E-mail:dongliang@cczu.edu.cn,研究方向为金属材料的腐蚀与防护
Corresponding author: DONG Liang, E-mail: dongliang@cczu.edu.cn
作者简介: 王萌萌,女,1987年生,高级工程师
Chemicals5‰ salinity seawater16.8‰ salinity seawater26.7‰ salinity seawaterSea mud
NaCl2.80110.30517.780
CaCl2·2H2O0.2820.6321.048
MgCl2·6H2O1.1584.2487.909
NaHCO30.1650.1600.147On-site sampling
Na2SO40.4951.1950.024
KCl0.0650.2540.479
KBr0.0790.0600.060
NaF0.0540.2540.024
表1  不同盐度的海水模拟液化学成分 (g/L)
图1  流动海水电化学测试装置
图2  海底管道牺牲阳极阴极保护数值模拟区域及边界示意图
图3  海底管道牺牲阳极阴极保护几何模型和网格划分
Case No.Marine environmentConcrete weighted environmentCoating breakdown factor
EnvironmentResistivity / Ω·mConcreteResistivity / Ω·m
126.7‰ salinity seawater1.189No-6%
2Yes43.864
3Yes43.864
4Mud0.250No-
5Yes17.880
6Yes17.880
表2  数值模拟算例设置
图4  在静态海水和海泥中带混凝土配重层X60钢I-t曲线
5‰ salinity seawater16.8‰ salinity seawater26.7‰ salinity seawaterSea mud
Ep, CSE / mVI / mA·m-2Ep, CSE / mVI / mA·m-2Ep, CSE / mVI / mA·m-2Ep, CSE / mVI / mA·m-2
-5740-5910-6040-5620
-86723.428-83442.341-86856.427-82916.338
-94526.204-88073.960-94777.533-89618.221
-101136.321-978103.107-1019169.121-101024.073
-106852.883-1076173.679-1081228.427-108134.603
-112075.333-1151239.587-1149316.116-110450.578
-1154102.461-1201311.849-1221396.476-116791.378
表3  在静态海水和海泥中带混凝土层X60钢稳态极化数据
图5  在静态海水和海泥中X60裸钢I-t曲线
图6  在静态海水和海泥中X60钢稳态极化曲线
图7  X60裸钢和带混凝土层X60钢在2 m/s流动海水中的I-t曲线
MaterialECSE / mVEp, CSE / mVI / mA·m-2
X60 steel-854-8502195
-924-9202168
-1024-10202372
-1124-11054555
-1224-11639385
-1324-121134118
Concrete weighted-854-81645
X60 steel-924-88559
-1024-984110
-1124-1082163
-1224-1174189
-1324-1212352
表4  X60裸钢和带混凝土层X60钢在2 m/s流动海水中的极化数据
图8  X60裸钢和带混凝土层X60钢在静态和2 m/s流动海水中的稳态极化曲线
图9  在静态海水和海泥中带混凝土层X60钢Nyquist图
图10  在静态海水和海泥中阻抗等效电路图
EnvironmentEp, CSE / mVRs / Ω·cm2Cc / F·cm-2Rc / Ω·cm2Cdl / F·cm-2Rp / Ω·cm2
5‰ salinity seawater-806850.31.523 × 10-9206852.051 × 10-441341
-867761.61.526 × 10-9204182.819 × 10-444493
-945813.31.490 × 10-9205133.842 × 10-421283
-1011817.41.488 × 10-9204154.401 × 10-416398
-1068839.11.444 × 10-9202614.103 × 10-414555
-1120875.81.436 × 10-9202303.992 × 10-411554
-1154861.71.479 × 10-9205585.117 × 10-48124
16.8‰ salinity seawater-811220.41.220 × 10-985571.769 × 10-410295
-834490.81.270 × 10-980332.511 × 10-48168
-880319.41.284 × 10-975274.613 × 10-45472
-978210.91.225 × 10-972246.221 × 10-42594
-1076524.11.255 × 10-967914.856 × 10-41640
-1151311.11.181 × 10-964561.032 × 10-31709
-1201510.51.227 × 10-963609.296 × 10-42899
26.7‰ salinity seawater-822574.31.121 × 10-944986.686 × 10-43231
-868562.11.120 × 10-944761.061 × 10-32268
-947581.31.091 × 10-944531.307 × 10-31364
-1019575.81.097 × 10-944181.316 × 10-41036
-10815751.114 × 10-944168.392 × 10-42507
-1149557.91.132 × 10-945286.801 × 10-42155
-1221539.51.158 × 10-945064.529 × 10-41805
Sea mud-7891551.299 × 10-9104012.297 × 10-416877
-8291651.285 × 10-9107793.276 × 10-414086
-896133.71.276 × 10-9111614.821 × 10-410706
-1010154.91.283 × 10-9113206.745 × 10-48185
-108190.581.260 × 10-9114317.529 × 10-46803
-1104160.51.290 × 10-9109415.513 × 10-45293
-1167133.51.259 × 10-9109424.209 × 10-43600
表5  在静态海水和海泥中带混凝土层X60钢的阻抗拟合参数
EnvironmentAverage resistance Rc / Ω·cm2Concrete resistivity ρc / Ω·mEnvironment resistivity ρs / Ω·m
5‰ salinity seawater2044081.7601.136
16.8‰ salinity seawater727829.1120.448
26.7‰ salinity seawater447017.8800.250
Sea mud1099643.8641.189
表6  不同介质中混凝土配重层和介质的电阻率
图11  在静态海水和海泥中带混凝土层X60钢阻抗E-Rp曲线
图12  X60裸钢和带混凝土层X60钢在2 m/s流动海水中的阻抗Nyquist图
MaterialEp, CSE / mVRs / Ω·cm2Cc / F·cm-2Rc / Ω·cm2Cdl / F·cm-2Rp / Ω·cm2
Bare X60 steel-8506.718--1.457 × 10-33110
-9206.202--1.104 × 10-33231
-10206.327--1.326 × 10-3504.5
-11057.49--1.246 × 10-3162.5
-11639.421--7.838 × 10-465.81
-121110.2--7.675 × 10-423.33
Concrete weighted X60 steel-816378.51.382 × 10-954677.200 × 10-43425
-885472.61.295 × 10-951998.680 × 10-43042
-984454.41.422 × 10-951271.040 × 10-32472
-1082439.61.240 × 10-950279.610 × 10-42229
-1174399.81.441 × 10-949567.310 × 10-42002
-12123731.310 × 10-949302.060 × 10-41928
表7  X60裸钢和带混凝土层X60钢2 m/s流动海水中阻抗拟合数据
图13  X60裸钢和带混凝土层X60钢在静态和2 m/s流动海水中的阻抗EP-Rp曲线
图14  在海水和海泥中混凝土配重层对管道电位分布影响模拟结果
Case No.Pipe potential rangeE / mVAnode output current / mA
1-830--9697513
2-977--10232470
3-962--9962069
4-851--9751444
5-983--1026470
6-969--1010458
表8  不同算例下管道电位和牺牲阳极输出电流模拟结果
[1] Azam M A, Sukarti S, Zaimi M. Corrosion behavior of API-5L-X42 petroleum/natural gas pipeline steel in South China Sea and Strait of Melaka seawaters [J]. Eng. Fail. Anal., 2020, 115: 104654
doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104654
[2] Xu Y Z, Zhang Q L, Gao S, et al. Exploring the effects of sand impacts and anodic dissolution on localized erosion-corrosion in sand entraining electrolyte [J]. Wear, 2021, 478-479: 203907
doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2021.203907
[3] Zhu W H, Sun D X, Xie F, et al. Effects of corrosion defect growth on submarine pipeline under operating pressure and axial displacement [J]. Ocean Eng., 2023, 267: 113297
doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113297
[4] Zang Z P, Xu Z, Zou X, et al. Deformation response of a submarine pipeline with rock berm + concrete mattress protection subjected to impact by a dropping anchor [J]. Ocean Eng., 2023, 41(4): 114
[4] 臧志鹏, 许 振, 邹 星 等. 块石和混凝土排垫保护下海底管道落锚撞击变形响应研究 [J]. 海洋工程, 2023, 41(4): 114
[5] Cao G M. External corrosion control method of hangzhou bay submarine crude oil pipeline [J]. Corros. Protect., 2023, 44(7): 117
[5] 曹国民. 杭州湾海底原油管道的外腐蚀控制方法 [J]. 腐蚀与防护, 2023, 44(7): 117
[6] Liu R, Song Y S, Cui Y, et al. Corrosion of high-strength steel in 3.5%NaCl solution under hydrostatic pressure: Understanding electrochemical corrosion with tensile stress coupling [J]. Corros. Sci., 2023, 219: 111204
doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2023.111204
[7] Pei Y Y, Guan F, Dong X C, et al. Effect of Desulfovibrio Bizertensis SY-1 on corrosive behavior of metal materials under cathodic polarization [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Protect., 2024, 44: 345
[7] 裴莹莹, 管 方, 董续成 等. Desulfovibrio Bizertensis SY-1在阴极极化条件下对X70管线钢的腐蚀行为研究 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2024, 44: 345
doi: 10.11902/1005.4537.2023.074
[8] Liu G. Discussion on DC voltage gradient (DCVG) measurement and %IR calculation of buried coating pipeline [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Protect., 2024, 44: 512
[8] 刘 国. 关于埋地防腐层管道直流电位梯度(DCVG)测量与%IR计算的讨论 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2024, 44: 512
[9] Li C J, Du M. Research and development of cathodic protection for steels in deep seawater [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Protect., 2013, 33: 10
[9] 李成杰, 杜 敏. 深海钢铁材料的阴极保护技术研究及发展 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2013, 33: 10
[10] Wang L L, Wu J, Zhang T. Underwater cutting and removal of subsea pipeline concrete counterweight layer and anticorrosion coating by high-pressure water jet in complex sea area [J]. Petrol. Eng. Constr., 2021, 47(3): 27
[10] 王立领, 吴 军, 张 涛. 复杂海域海底管道混凝土配重及防腐层高压水射流水下切割清除施工技术 [J]. 石油工程建设, 2021, 47(3): 27
[11] Li X H, Chen G M, Zhu H W. Quantitative risk analysis on leakage failure of submarine oil and gas pipelines using Bayesian network [J]. Process Safety Environ. Protect. 2016, 103: 163
doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2016.06.006
[12] Miao X Y, Zhao H. Corroded submarine pipeline degradation prediction based on theory-guided IMOSOA-EL model [J]. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety, 2024, 243: 109902
doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109902
[13] Tan J H, Wang S Q, Zhang S T, et al. Electric field calculation of pipe with cathodic protection in seawater by BEM [J]. Appl. Mech. Mater., 2014, 621: 230
doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.621
[14] Hou J, Gao Y, Wei W R. The research and application of numerical simulation evaluation technology for cathodic protection system of the subsea pipeline in a gas field of South China Sea [A]. The 28th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference [C]. Sapporo, Japan, 2018
[15] Marcassoli P, Bonetti A, Lazzari L, et al. Modeling of potential distribution of subsea pipeline under cathodic protection by finite element method [J]. Mater. Corros., 2015, 66: 619
[16] Kiselev V, Kalyutik A, Rouzich E. Influence of the soil electrical conductivity in the area of the underground pipeline on energy efficiency of the cathodic protection [J]. MATEC Web of Conf., 2018, 245: 07015
[17] Kang W W. The study on the cathodic protection and hydrogen permeation of X65 pipeline steel under the condition of flowing seawater [D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2018
[17] 康蔚蔚. 流动海水条件下X65管线钢的阴极保护及氢渗透行为研究 [D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2018
[18] Fan F Q, Song J W, Li C J, et al. Effect of flow velocity on cathodic protection of DH36 steel in seawater [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Protect., 2014, 34: 550
[18] 范丰钦, 宋积文, 李成杰 等. 海水流速对DH36平台钢阴极保护的影响 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2014, 34: 550
doi: 10.11902/1005.4537.2013.183
[19] Ji T W, Wang S L, Cai Z, et al. Influence of seawater flow rate on the polarization curve of X80 pipeline steel [J]. Oil-Gas Field Surf. Eng., 2018, 37(6): 64
[19] 季廷伟, 王树立, 才 政 等. 海水流速对X80管线钢极化曲线的影响 [J]. 油气田地面工程, 2018, 37(6): 64
[20] Zhang G Y, Tian Y, Liu Y, et al. Dynamic electrochemical model of steel corrosion in concrete microenvironment under multifield action of heat-moisture-chlorine [J]. J. Mater. Civil Eng., 2024, 36: 04023507
[21] Hornbostel K, Larsen C K, Geiker M R. Relationship between concrete resistivity and corrosion rate-A literature review [J]. Cem. Concr. Compos., 2013, 39: 60
doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.03.019
[22] Brenna A, Beretta S, Uglietti R, et al. Cathodic protection monitoring of buried carbon steel pipeline: Measurement and interpretation of instant-off potential [J]. Corros. Eng. Sci. Technol., 2017, 52: 253
doi: 10.1080/1478422X.2016.1262096
[23] Angst U, Büchler M, Martin B, et al. Cathodic protection of soil buried steel pipelines-a critical discussion of protection criteria and threshold values [J]. Mater. Corros., 2016, 67: 1135
[24] Kou J, Ren Z. Research progress of regional cathodic protection potential distribution of tank floor based on numerical calculation [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Protect., 2023, 43: 871
[24] 寇 杰, 任 哲. 基于数值计算的罐底板阴极保护电位分布研究进展与展望 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2023, 43: 871
[25] Googan C. The cathodic protection potential criteria: Evaluation of the evidence [J]. Mater. Corros., 2021, 72: 446
doi: 10.1002/maco.202011978
[26] Huang A L, Chen Q, Xie L J, et al. EIS based assessment of electrodeposition effect of concrete cracks: Experiment and equivalent model [J]. Constr. Build. Mater., 2023, 377: 131080
doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131080
[27] Li Z L, Shang X B, Huang J D, et al. Electric circuit design in EIS for metal corrosion system with coating defects [J]. Corros. Protect., 2013, 34: 52
[27] 李自力, 尚兴彬, 黄敬东 等. 带涂层缺陷金属EIS研究中等效电路的设计 [J]. 腐蚀与防护, 2013, 34: 52
[28] Xiong X L, Yang H C, Zhang N, et al. Combined effect of cathodic potential and calcareous deposits on hydrogen evolution and permeation in Q460 steel [J]. Inter. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 79: 1227
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.07.118
[29] Zheng Z Y, Feng Y X, Song Q F, et al. Effectiveness of cathodic protection on rotating test-piece of Q345B steel in artificial seawater [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Protect., 2025, 45: 927
[29] 郑中逸, 冯毅翔, 宋沁峰 等. 转动条件下Q345B钢在人工海水中阴极保护效果试验研究 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45: 927
doi: 10.11902/1005.4537.2024.285
[1] 周小包, 王子腾, 任延杰, 董少阳, 甘浪, 李聪. 激光粉末床熔融成形CoCrNi中熵合金的高温热腐蚀行为[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(1): 115-125.
[2] 庄宁, 曾易, 欧阳正平, 许金荣, 李翰泽, 宋霄锟, 王亚洲. 海洋环境下钢筋混凝土桩基的腐蚀与阴极保护特征分析[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(1): 273-282.
[3] 王得, 张璠, 王兴奇, 张贺新, 赵成志, 杨延格. 单组分氟碳改性环氧涂层对碳钢和铝合金长期防腐性能的对比研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45(6): 1549-1562.
[4] 许诗源, 孟鑫, 杨亚璋, 刘辰, 张昭, 方晓祖. 腐蚀形貌对镁合金电化学阻抗谱特征的影响研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45(6): 1589-1598.
[5] 项琦峰, 赵阳, 张涛, 王福会. 模拟浅海及深海环境中阴极极化对10CrNi5MoV钢氢脆敏感性的影响[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45(6): 1599-1609.
[6] 郭玉杰, 李艳辉, 夏大海, 胡文彬. 腐蚀电化学阻抗谱的数据解析与物理模型研究进展[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45(5): 1143-1160.
[7] 夏大海, 潘成成, 郭玉杰, 胡文彬, TRIBOLLET Bernard. EIS研究7050铝合金在NaCl溶液空蚀作用下的界面状态与腐蚀机制[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45(5): 1196-1204.
[8] 何武豪, 刘阳, 杨思懿, 张韶栋, 吴伟, 张俊喜. 敏化处理对传统和增材制造316L不锈钢电化学和晶间腐蚀的影响[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45(5): 1331-1340.
[9] 郭姿含, 樊建春, 杨云朋, 张军, 代四维. 动载作用下高压三通管汇的冲蚀特性研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45(3): 698-708.
[10] 肖琦琨, 马军, 郭凯, 熊新, 袁浩然. 基于DDPM-RSM的浆体管道冲蚀磨损数值模拟研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45(3): 709-719.
[11] 李丽, 李善文, 史洪微, 梁国平, 李春霖, 孙禹, 秦晋, 王伟, 韩恩厚. 高速列车用铝合金环氧底漆的腐蚀行为和湿热老化机理研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45(3): 757-764.
[12] 汤熠鑫, 张飞, 崔中雨, 崔洪芝, 李燚周. 氢对2205双相不锈钢在3.5%NaCl溶液中缝隙腐蚀行为影响[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45(2): 431-437.
[13] 王天丛, 赵东杨, 向雪云, 吴航, 王文. 一种环氧耐蚀涂层在NaCl溶液中的劣化行为研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2024, 44(5): 1361-1369.
[14] 刘喆, 邓成满, 魏军胜, 夏大海. 涂覆有机涂层的镀锡薄钢板耐蒸煮性能电化学快速检测技术研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2024, 44(4): 883-890.
[15] 傅江悦, 郭建喜, 杨延格, 冷哲, 王文. 单相流冲刷条件下一种低合金高强钢的腐蚀行为研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2024, 44(3): 585-600.