Please wait a minute...
中国腐蚀与防护学报  2026, Vol. 46 Issue (3): 919-930     CSTR: 32134.14.1005.4537.2025.163      DOI: 10.11902/1005.4537.2025.163
  研究报告 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 |
自由基对高压电缆中间接头析氢腐蚀过程的影响
刘凡1, 刘凤莲1, 范松海1, 邵千秋1, 周凯2, 李泽瑞2, 陈熠东2, 文柯成3(), 张静3
1.国网四川省电力公司电力科学研究院 成都 610041
2.四川大学电气工程学院 成都 610065
3.四川大学建筑与环境学院 成都 610065
Influence of Radicals on Hydrogen Evolution Corrosion Process of High Voltage Cable Intermediate Joints
LIU Fan1, LIU Fenglian1, FAN Songhai1, SHAO Qianqiu1, ZHOU Kai2, LI Zerui2, CHEN Yidong2, WEN Kecheng3(), ZHANG Jing3
1.State Grid Sichuan Electric Power Research Institute, Chengdu 610041, China
2.College of Electrical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
3.College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
引用本文:

刘凡, 刘凤莲, 范松海, 邵千秋, 周凯, 李泽瑞, 陈熠东, 文柯成, 张静. 自由基对高压电缆中间接头析氢腐蚀过程的影响[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(3): 919-930.
Fan LIU, Fenglian LIU, Songhai FAN, Qianqiu SHAO, Kai ZHOU, Zerui LI, Yidong CHEN, Kecheng WEN, Jing ZHANG. Influence of Radicals on Hydrogen Evolution Corrosion Process of High Voltage Cable Intermediate Joints[J]. Journal of Chinese Society for Corrosion and protection, 2026, 46(3): 919-930.

全文: PDF(14774 KB)   HTML
摘要: 

针对电缆接头中两种典型的金属/乙烯-醋酸乙烯酯共聚物(EVA)界面,通过阶梯递增电流法-析氢实验系统研究其产氢电流密度阈值、产氢速率和饱和产氢浓度的析氢特性,以及开路电位、电化学阻抗和Tafel曲线等电化学性质,并详细揭示了自由基在加剧金属材料析氢腐蚀中的作用机制。通过自由基淬灭实验和电子顺磁共振测试,确定了在电化学析氢腐蚀过程中主要的自由基为氢自由基(H)和羟基自由基(OH)。电缆接头产氢过程中,H是生成氢分子的关键中间体,直接影响H2生成的速率;OH主要通过电流与水或OH-反应生成,能够显著加剧金属的腐蚀过程。

关键词 中间接头金属材料析氢腐蚀电化学自由基    
Abstract

The hydrogen evolution characteristics of two typical metal/ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) interfaces for cable joints were investigated by hydrogen evolution test with stepwise increasing current method, especially in term of the hydrogen production current density threshold, hydrogen production rate, and saturated hydrogen concentration, as well as electrochemical properties such as open-circuit potential, electrochemical impedance, and Tafel curves etc. It also elucidates the mechanism by which radicals exacerbate hydrogen evolution corrosion in metal materials. By using radical quenching agents to inhibit hydrogen evolution and conducting electron paramagnetic resonance detection during the hydrogen evolution process, it is established that the main radicals in the electrochemical hydrogen evolution corrosion process are hydrogen radicals (H) and hydroxyl radicals (OH). During the hydrogen production process in cable joints, the hydrogen radical is a key intermediate in the generation of hydrogen molecules, directly influencing the rate of hydrogen gas production. The hydroxyl radical is primarily generated through reactions with current and water (H2O) or hydroxide (OH-), and it can significantly exacerbate the corrosion process of metals.

Key wordsintermediate joints    metallic materials    hydrogen evolution corrosion    electrochemistry    radicals
收稿日期: 2025-06-03      32134.14.1005.4537.2025.163
ZTFLH:  TG174  
基金资助:国家电网有限公司科技项目(5500-202326176A-1-1-ZN)
通讯作者: 文柯成,E-mail:15282139842@163.com,研究方向为自由基高级氧化技术
Corresponding author: WEN Kecheng, E-mail: 15282139842@163.com
作者简介: 刘 凡,男,1978年生,博士,教授级高级工程师
图1  金属析氢实验平台和电化学实验平台
图2  Al/EVA和Cu/EVA的析氢电流阈值及Al和Cu析氢前的OCP曲线
图3  不同电流密度下Al/EVA和Cu/EVA的析氢曲线
图4  加入自由基淬灭剂前后Al/EVA和Cu/EVA的析氢曲线
图5  加入自由基淬灭剂前后Al/EVA和Cu/EVA析氢后的OCP曲线
图6  加入自由基淬灭剂前后Al/EVA和Cu/EVA产氢后的EIS谱
Experimental groupRct / Ω·cm2Rtotal / Ω·cm2
Al/EVA2251745192
Al/EVA, radical quencher1918437753
Cu/EVA1250633733
Cu/EVA, radical quencher1152129427
表1  加入自由基淬灭剂前后Al/EVA和Cu/EVA产氢后的拟合阻抗值
图7  加入自由基淬灭剂前后Al/EVA和Cu/EVA产氢后的Tafel曲线
Experimental GroupEcorr / VIcorr / A·cm-2
Al/EVA-0.4445.924 × 10-7
Al/EVA, radical quencher-0.4863.363 × 10-6
Cu/EVA-0.1461.220 × 10-7
Cu/EVA, radical quencher-0.4893.211 × 10-6
表2  加入自由基淬灭剂前后Al/EVA和Cu/EVA产氢后的Tafel曲线拟合值
图8  析氢腐蚀前后金属Al和Cu试样的光学显微镜形貌
图9  析氢腐蚀前后金属Al和Cu试样的SEM图及EDS谱图
图10  析氢腐蚀后金属Al和Cu试样的XRD图谱
图11  Al/EVA和Cu/EVA体系下MB的去除率曲线
图12  Al/EVA和Cu/EVA体系加入自由基淬灭剂后MB的去除率曲线和降解动力学拟合曲线
图13  DMPO-OH及DMPO-H标准EPR图谱及Al/EVA和Cu/EVA体系的EPR图谱
图14  金属/EVA结构中自由基生成及作用机制图
[1] Hui B J, Fu M L, Liu T, et al. Statistical analysis on failures of 110 kV and above power cable system [J]. South. Power Syst. Technol., 2017, 11(12): 44
doi: 10.13648/j.cnki.issn1674-0629.2017.12.007
[1] 惠宝军, 傅明利, 刘 通 等. 110 kV及以上电力电缆系统故障统计分析 [J]. 南方电网技术, 2017, 11(12): 44
doi: 10.13648/j.cnki.issn1674-0629.2017.12.007
[2] Wang R C, Kang H W, He Y Y, et al. Research on ultrasonic testing of internal defects in silicone rubber materials for cable joints [J]. Insul. Mater., 2021, 54(4): 102
[2] 王若丞, 康洪玮, 贺云逸 等. 电缆接头硅橡胶材料内部缺陷的超声检测研究 [J]. 绝缘材料, 2021, 54(4): 102
[3] Gu L, Zhao A Q, Hao H K, et al. Simulation study on effect of defects on temperature distribution of cable intermediate joint [J]. Insul. Mater., 2019, 52(5): 69
[3] 古 亮, 赵阿琴, 郝鸿凯 等. 缺陷对电缆中间接头温度分布影响的仿真研究 [J]. 绝缘材料, 2019, 52(5): 69
[4] Yang J H, Liu X F, Yu L. On detection of crack defects in lead seal of high voltage cable [J]. Popular Util. Electr., 2021, 36: 41
[4] 杨金海, 刘雪锋, 余 磊. 高压电缆铅封裂纹缺陷检测方法研究 [J]. 大众用电, 2021, 36: 41
[5] Li C Y, Shahsavarian T, Baferani M A, et al. High temperature insulation materials for DC cable insulation-Part III: Degradation and surface breakdown [J]. IEEE Trans. Dielect. Electr. Insul., 2021, 28: 240
[6] Zhou Y, Yuan C, Li C Y, et al. Temperature dependent electrical properties of thermoplastic polypropylene nanocomposites for HVDC cable insulation [J]. IEEE Trans. Dielect. Electr. Insul., 2019, 26: 1596
[7] Xu Z L, Feng Y, Yang Y P, et al. Electrochemical corrosion and water inflow defect diagnosis of lead sealing section of intermediate joint for high voltage cable [J]. Insul. Mater., 2022, 55(11): 118
[7] 徐忠林, 冯 阳, 杨永鹏 等. 高压电缆中间接头铅封段电化学腐蚀及进水缺陷诊断 [J]. 绝缘材料, 2022, 55(11): 118
[8] Wang X F, Ma T, Ma X, et al. Corrosion factors and mechanisms of buffer layer and aluminum sheath inside high-voltage cable [J]. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 2022, 2168: 012004
[9] Chen Y D, Zhou K, Kong J M, et al. Hydrogen evolution and electromigration in the corrosion of aluminium metal sheath inside high‐voltage cables [J]. High Voltage, 2022, 7: 260
doi: 10.1049/hve2.v7.2
[10] Zhou K, Zhao Q, Li Y, et al. Evaluation technology of water-blocking buffer layer of high voltage cable based on stages classification of gases evolution [J]. High Voltage Eng., 2022, 48: 3882
[10] 周 凯, 赵 琦, 李 原 等. 基于分阶段产气的高压电缆阻水缓冲层状态评估 [J]. 高电压技术, 2022, 48: 3882
[11] Ye G H, Pan W, Wang H. Analysis on degradation of high-voltage power cable joints [J]. Electr. Saf. Technol., 2021, 23(5): 16
[11] 叶冠豪, 潘 伟, 王 浩. 高压电力电缆接头劣化分析 [J]. 电力安全技术, 2021, 23(5): 16
[12] Tian F Q, Li X B, Zhang S T, et al. The partial discharge evolution characteristics of 10 kV XLPE cable joint [J]. IEEE Access, 2023, 11: 108680
doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3321805
[13] Zhang Z P, Zhao J K, Zhao W, et al. Influence of morphological variations on the AC breakdown of XLPE insulation in submarine cable factory joints [J]. High Voltage, 2020, 5: 69
doi: 10.1049/hve2.v5.1
[14] Hu Y J, Hu W, Yang W, et al. The corrosion analysis and prevention of secondary cable joints used in outdoor terminal boxes of substation in humid environment [J]. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., 2021, 621: 012031
[15] Huang S Y, Liu S C, Yang S P, et al. Corrosion and wear corrosion behavior of FH40 marine steel in simulated polar seawater environment [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Prot., 2025, 45: 859
[15] 黄诗雨, 刘士琛, 杨淞普 等. FH40船用钢在模拟极地海水环境中的腐蚀与磨蚀行为 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45: 859
doi: 10.11902/1005.4537.2024.234
[16] Chen Y Q, Ran G L, Lu D D, et al. Effect of cyclic strengthening on corrosion behavior of 7075 Al-alloy [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Prot., 2025, 45: 1051
[16] 陈宇强, 冉光林, 陆丁丁 等. 循环强化对7075铝合金腐蚀行为的影响 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45: 1051
doi: 10.11902/1005.4537.2024.287
[17] Chen Y D, Zhou K, Lei Q Q, et al. Phenomena of white spots on the buffer layer and mechanisms of hydrogen evolution corrosion inside high-voltage cables [J]. Proc. CSEE, 2023, 43: 4830
[17] 陈熠东, 周 凯, 雷清泉 等. 高压电缆阻水缓冲层的白斑现象及析氢腐蚀机理 [J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2023, 43: 4830
[18] Li Z S, Li B L, Yu M, et al. Amorphous metallic ultrathin nanostructures: A latent ultra-high-density atomic-level catalyst for electrochemical energy conversion [J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47: 26956
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.06.049
[19] He Y M, Liu L R, Zhu C, et al. Amorphizing noble metal chalcogenide catalysts at the single-layer limit towards hydrogen production [J]. Nat. Catal., 2022, 5: 212
doi: 10.1038/s41929-022-00753-y
[20] Pei S Z, You S J, Ma J, et al. Electron spin resonance evidence for electro-generated hydroxyl radicals [J]. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2020, 54: 13333
doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c05287
[21] Zhao H D, Nie T, Zhao H X, et al. Enhancement of Fe-C micro-electrolysis in water by magnetic field: Mechanism, influential factors and application effectiveness [J]. J. Hazard. Mater., 2021, 410: 124643
doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124643
[22] Wei Y H, Liu M Y, Li X J, et al. Effect of temperature on electric‐thermal properties of semi‐conductive shielding layer and insulation layer for high‐voltage cable [J]. High Voltage, 2022, 7: 1217
doi: 10.1049/hve2.v7.6
[23] Lin J, Hou S, Wang Z X, et al. Effect of low-density polyethylene on properties of ethylene-vinyl based semi-conductive shielding materials [J]. Compos. Sci. Technol., 2025, 262: 111046
doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2025.111046
[24] Huang L, Zhang X Y, Yuan G F, et al. Ion concentrations and their spatial variability in underground water and surface water in typical terrestrial ecosystems in China [J]. Environ. Sci., 2019, 40: 2086
doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201809040 pmid: 31087844
[24] 黄 丽, 张心昱, 袁国富 等. 我国典型陆地生态系统水化学离子特征及空间分布 [J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40: 2086
[25] Wang Z W, Zhou S Y, Li Z, et al. Hydrochemical characteristics and genesis analysis of shallow groundwater in Tiantai Basin [J]. Resour. Environ. Eng., 2023, 37: 438
doi: 10.16536/j.cnki.issn.1671-1211.2023.04.009
[25] 王震威, 周施阳, 李 振 等. 天台盆地浅层地下水水化学特征及成因分析 [J]. 资源环境与工程, 2023, 37: 438
doi: 10.16536/j.cnki.issn.1671-1211.2023.04.009
[26] Liu H, Song Y, Li Y C, et al. Hydrochemical characteristics and control factors of shallow groundwater in Anqing section of the Yangtze River Basin [J]. Environ. Sci., 2024, 45: 1525
[26] 刘 海, 宋 阳, 李迎春 等. 长江流域安庆段浅层地下水水化学特征及控制因素 [J]. 环境科学, 2024, 45: 1525
[27] Cheng S, Xu M, Luo M, et al. Analysis on hydrochemical characteristics and origin of the main ions of shallow groundwater in redbed of Suining Area, central Sichuan Basin [J]. Resour. Environ. Yangtze Basin, 2020, 29: 220
[27] 成 胜, 许 模, 罗 明 等. 川中遂宁地区红层地下水水化学特征及主要离子来源分析 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2020, 29: 220
[28] Pang Y P, Peng T J, Zeng W M. Synergistic bioleaching of chalcopyrite and bornite in Acidithiobacillus ferrivorans YL15 and electrochemical study at low temperature [J]. Chin. J. Nonferrous Met., 2022, 32: 271
[28] 彭玙萍, 彭堂见, 曾伟民. 低温下YL15对黄铜矿和斑铜矿的协同浸出及电化学研究 [J]. 中国有色金属学报, 2022, 32: 271
[29] Crundwell F K. The influence of the electronic structure of solids on the anodic dissolution and leaching of semiconducting sulphide minerals [J]. Hydrometallurgy, 1988, 21: 155
doi: 10.1016/0304-386X(88)90003-5
[30] Liang C J, Wang Z S, Bruell C J. Influence of pH on persulfate oxidation of TCE at ambient temperatures [J]. Chemosphere, 2007, 66: 106
pmid: 16814844
[31] Zhang H B, Zhang Y H, Ma L, et al. Electrochemical performance of sacrificial anodes in alternating depth and shallowness of seawater environments [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Prot., 2022, 42: 867
[31] 张海兵, 张一晗, 马 力 等. 深浅交变环境牺牲阳极电化学性能研究 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2022, 42: 867
doi: 10.11902/1005.4537.2021.293
[32] Riazi H R, Danaee I, Peykari M. Influence of ultraviolet light irradiation on the corrosion behavior of carbon steel AISI 1015 [J]. Met. Mater. Int., 2013, 19: 217
doi: 10.1007/s12540-013-2014-1
[33] Björkbacka Å, Johnson C M, Leygraf C, et al. Role of the oxide layer in radiation-induced corrosion of copper in anoxic water [J]. J. Phys. Chem., 2016, 120C: 11450
[34] Ubaldini A, Telloli C, Rizzo A, et al. A study of accelerated corrosion of stainless steels under highly oxidizing conditions [J]. Coatings, 2024, 14: 390
doi: 10.3390/coatings14040390
[35] Bai G, Chen M Q, Cai N, et al. Advances on determination methods of free radicals in advanced oxidation processes [J]. J. Instrum. Anal., 2021, 40: 1109
[35] 白 格, 陈茂清, 蔡 楠 等. 高级氧化技术中自由基的检测技术和方法研究进展 [J]. 分析测试学报, 2021, 40: 1109
[36] Acedo-Mendoza A G, Infantes-Molina A, Vargas-Hernández D, et al. Photodegradation of methylene blue and methyl orange with CuO supported on ZnO photocatalysts: the effect of copper loading and reaction temperature [J]. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process., 2020, 119: 105257
doi: 10.1016/j.mssp.2020.105257
[37] Yang B, Cheng X, Zhang Y, et al. Staged assessment for the involving mechanism of humic acid on enhancing water decontamination using H2O2-Fe(III) process [J]. J. Hazard. Mater., 2021, 407: 124853
doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124853
[38] Luo M, Zhou H, Zhou P, et al. Insights into the role of in-situ and ex-situ hydrogen peroxide for enhanced ferrate(VI) towards oxidation of organic contaminants [J]. Water Research, 2021, 203: 117548
doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117548
[39] Xie J Z, Zhang C Y, Waite T D. Hydroxyl radicals in anodic oxidation systems: Generation, identification and quantification [J]. Water Res., 2022, 217: 118425
doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118425
[40] Hu Y N. Intensifying the desulfurization of high-sulfur bauxite byexternal field and the mechanism of oxidation of pyrite by hydroxyl radicals [D]. Beijing: University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences), 2018: 8
[40] 胡英楠. 羟基自由基氧化黄铁矿及外场强化高硫铝土矿电解脱硫机理 [D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学(中国科学院过程工程研究所), 2018: 8
[41] Malik A S, Liu T F, Dupuis M, et al. Water oxidation on TiO2: A comparative DFT study of 1e-, 2e-, and 4e- processes on rutile, anatase, and brookite [J]. J. Phys. Chem., 2020, 124C: 8094
[42] Guo X H, Yang Y, Deng Z Y. Filtrates with hydroxyl radicals prepared using Al + Acid + H2O2 for removing organic pollutants [J]. ACS Omega, 2021, 6: 14182
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c00801
[43] Soroka I, Chae N, Jonsson M. On the mechanism of γ-radiation-induced corrosion of copper in water [J]. Corros. Sci., 2021, 182: 109279
doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2021.109279
[44] Liu Z B, Ran B Y, Pei H, et al. Synergistic corrosion inhibition effect of a compound inhibitor for aluminum [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Prot., 2024, 44: 312
[44] 柳泽邦, 冉博元, 裴 恒 等. 金属铝用复配缓蚀剂协同缓蚀作用研究 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2024, 44: 312
doi: 10.11902/1005.4537.2023.186
[45] Wei G F, Deng S D, Shao D D, et al. Inhibition action of machilus yunnanensis leaves extract on corrosion of Al-plate in HCl medium [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Prot., 2024, 44: 601
[45] 魏高飞, 邓书端, 邵丹丹 等. 滇润楠叶提取物对铝在HCl中的缓蚀性能 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2024, 44: 601
doi: 10.11902/1005.4537.2023.234
[46] Zhu Z S, Zhang X L. Effect of free radicals generated by UV and semiconductor corrosion products on the inhibition behaviour of Ce3+ [J]. Mater. Chem. Phys., 2024, 312: 128675
doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.128675
[47] Fan C H. Effect of free radicals generated by simulated photocatalytic corrosion products on the behavior of corrosion inhibitor [D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2022: 69
[47] 范彩虹. 模拟光催化腐蚀产物生成的自由基对缓蚀剂作用行为的影响 [D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2022: 69
[1] 李亮, 殷文昌, 郜阿旺, 韩小乐, 杨延格. 寒带海洋环境下金属材料腐蚀与防护研究进展[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(3): 629-640.
[2] 王彦峰, 王流火, 孙仕达, 刘琦, 李亚梅, 王显宗. 柔直换流阀冷却系统关键材料失效与缓解措施研究进展[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(3): 653-662.
[3] 王萌萌, 曹国民, 孟繁兴, 李天亮, 宋沁峰, 单太航, 董亮. 混凝土配重层对近海海底钢质管道阴极保护效果的影响[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(3): 680-692.
[4] 李永坤, 周佳顺, 王友彬, 高锋, 王欣鹏, 汤宏群. 腐蚀产物对锌合金镀层切边腐蚀行为的影响[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(3): 703-716.
[5] 卢华轶, 李若愚, 程宇飞, 白英雄, 王艳丽. NiCrMoNbNiCoFeCrMoNb合金在700 ℃熔融NaCl-KCl-MgCl2 中的腐蚀行为研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(3): 730-742.
[6] 付磊, 张千, 林莉, 蹇科, 王雅君, 程飞, 彭东梅, 刘明. AH36船体钢在硫酸盐还原菌环境下的腐蚀机制研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(3): 833-844.
[7] 高金彪, 刘怡, 赵海波, 高清河, 吴禹沈, 于鑫. 超声波调控下聚合物缓蚀剂对金属腐蚀行为的作用机制研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(3): 883-892.
[8] 迟永晨, 王浩杰, 侯强强, 郑莉莉, 李希超. Ti3AlC2 在含F- 的高温硫酸溶液中的腐蚀行为研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(2): 533-540.
[9] 汪崧, 刘学武, 赵健, 李众, 杨吉可. 金银花植物提取物作为环保型缓蚀剂对低碳钢酸性溶液腐蚀的缓蚀效果[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(2): 541-548.
[10] 韩宇, 徐松, 华思然, 赵鹏, 王晓杰, 夏晓健, 张俊喜. 热镀锌层合金相的耐蚀性差异研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(2): 558-566.
[11] 衣俊达, 冷傲, 宫得伦, 韦博鑫. 低模量耐腐蚀亚稳 β 钛合金的电子束增材制造与性能研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(1): 49-59.
[12] 周小包, 王子腾, 任延杰, 董少阳, 甘浪, 李聪. 激光粉末床熔融成形CoCrNi中熵合金的高温热腐蚀行为[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(1): 115-125.
[13] 季磊, 张震, 王利卿, 李云龙, 马凯, 赵占勇, 白培康. 构筑角度和支撑对增材制造AlSi10Mg合金腐蚀行为影响[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(1): 145-154.
[14] 庄宁, 曾易, 欧阳正平, 许金荣, 李翰泽, 宋霄锟, 王亚洲. 海洋环境下钢筋混凝土桩基的腐蚀与阴极保护特征分析[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(1): 273-282.
[15] 王得, 张璠, 王兴奇, 张贺新, 赵成志, 杨延格. 单组分氟碳改性环氧涂层对碳钢和铝合金长期防腐性能的对比研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45(6): 1549-1562.