Please wait a minute...
中国腐蚀与防护学报  2005, Vol. 25 Issue (3): 152-156     
  研究报告 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 |
玻璃喷丸处理提高304不锈钢焊接接头抗应力腐蚀性能的研究
倪红芳;凌祥;彭薇薇
南京工业大学
PREVENTION OF STRESS CORROSION CRACKING IN WELD JOINT OF TYPE 304 STAINLESS STEEL BY GLASS-BEAD PEENING
;;Weiwei Peng
南京工业大学
全文: PDF(255 KB)  
摘要: 基于对304不锈钢焊接试板表面喷丸处理前后的表层残余应力X射线衍射测量,研究 了在42%沸腾MgCl2溶液中,表面玻璃喷丸和铸钢喷丸对304不锈钢焊接试板应力腐蚀开裂 敏感性的影响,比较了采用不同铸钢喷丸和玻璃喷丸处理工艺的304不锈钢焊接试板抗应力 腐蚀开裂的能力.试验结果表明:未喷丸处理的焊接试板6?h就发生开裂,50%、100%覆盖率的铸钢喷丸焊接试板分别在试验310?h和3500?h开裂,而200%覆盖率的铸钢喷丸焊接试板,50%、100%、200%覆盖率的玻璃喷丸焊接试板经历3500?h也未见开裂.因此,喷丸处理工艺能够很好地提高焊接构件抗应力腐蚀开裂能力;且在同样喷丸强度下,焊接接头经玻璃喷丸工艺处理后的抗应力腐蚀能力明显优于铸钢喷丸处理工艺.
关键词 304不锈钢焊接接头玻璃喷丸应力腐蚀开    
Abstract:Based on X-ray measurements of the residual stresses of shot peened and unpeened welded plates of 304 stainless steel,effects of glass bead peening and cast steel shot peening on stress corrosion susceptibility of weld joints of AISI type 304 stainless steel in boiling 42% MgCl2 were studied.Comparison of the potential against SCC of specimens peened by glass beads and cast steel shot s were carried on.The test results show:unpeened specimens crack within 6 hours.The steel-peened specimens with 50% coverage crack in boiling 42% MgCl2 after immersion for 310 hours,while the steel-peened specimens with 100% coverage crack after immersion for 3500 hours.However,cast steel-peened specimens with 200% coverage and glass-peened specimens with 50%,100% and 200% coverage are tested for a total of 3500 hours without visible stress corrosion cracks in the peen ed surfaces.In a word,shot peening is an effective method for protecting weldments against SCC,and weldments peened by glass beads resist SCC better than those peened by cast steel shots.
Key wordstype 304 stainless steel    weld joint    glass-bead peening    stress corrosion cracking (SCC)
收稿日期: 2004-07-21     
ZTFLH:  TG172.9  
通讯作者: 彭薇薇 joyce     E-mail: yuwei0492@sina.com
Corresponding author: Weiwei Peng     E-mail: yuwei0492@sina.com

引用本文:

倪红芳; 凌祥; 彭薇薇 . 玻璃喷丸处理提高304不锈钢焊接接头抗应力腐蚀性能的研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2005, 25(3): 152-156 .
Weiwei Peng. PREVENTION OF STRESS CORROSION CRACKING IN WELD JOINT OF TYPE 304 STAINLESS STEEL BY GLASS-BEAD PEENING. J Chin Soc Corr Pro, 2005, 25(3): 152-156 .

链接本文:

https://www.jcscp.org/CN/      或      https://www.jcscp.org/CN/Y2005/V25/I3/152

[1]LuSY,ZhangDK.StressCorrosionCrackingofStainlessSteel[M].Beijing:SciencePress,1977(陆世英,张德康.不锈钢应力腐蚀破裂[M].北京:科学出版社,1977)
[2]QiaoLJ,WangYB,ZhuWY.MechanismofStressCorrosion Cracking[M].Beijing:SciencePress,1993(乔利杰,王燕斌,诸武扬.应力腐蚀机理[M]北京:科学出版社,1993)
[3]PanXD,ShenFG,DongJM,etal.AnalysisoffailureduetoSCC instainlesssteelstoveshell[J].WeldingJournal,1998,(2):9-12(潘希德,沈风刚,董俊明等.奥氏体不锈钢炉体应力腐蚀破裂失效分析[J].焊接,1998,(2):9-12)
[4]DongJM,PanXD,FanPL,etal.Thestresscorrosioncrackingof stainlesssteelanditsweldedjointsinMgCl2solution[J].J.Xi’an JiaotongUniversity,1997,31(12):49-54(董俊明,潘希德,樊培丽等.不锈钢焊接接头在MgCl2溶液中的应力腐蚀开裂研究[J].西安交通大学学报,1997,31(12):49-54)
[5]NiHF,LingX,etal.Simulationof3Dresidualstressesfieldofmul ti-passweldingbyFEM[J].J.MechanicalStrength,2004,26(2):218-222(倪红芳,凌祥等.多道焊三维残余应力场有限元模拟[J].机械强度,2004,26(2):218-222)
[6]KirkD,RenderPE.Effectsofpeeningonstresscorrosioncracking incarbonsteel[A].NakoniecnyA.The7thInternationalConference onShotPeening[C].Warsaw:InternationalScientificCommittee forShotPeening,1999,167-176
[7]TakemotoM,ShinoharaT,ShiraiM.Preventionofstresscorrosion crackingofweldmentbywetshotpeening[A].BalcarGP.The SecondInternationalConferenceonShotPeening[C].Chicago:In ternationalScientificCommitteeforShotPeening,1984,39-42
[8]TakemotoM,ShinoharaT,ShiraiM.Controlofstresscorrosion crackingbyshotpeening[A].Niku-Lari.TheFirstInternational ConferenceonShotPeening[C].Pairs:InternationalScientific CommitteeforShotPeening,1981,521-527
[9]ZuoX,XuSB.EffectsofballblastandelectrolessNi-Pplatingon stresscorrosionresistanceof1Cr18Ni9Tistainlesssteelinchloride medium[J].Mater.Prot.,1994,27(10):5-7(左禹,许绍波.喷丸、化学镀Ni-P对1Cr18Ni9Ti不锈钢抗应力腐蚀的影响[J].材料保护,1994,27(10):5-7)
[10]AltenbergerI,ScholtesB,MartinU,etal.Cyclicdeformationand nearsurfacemicrostructuresofshotpeenedordeeprolled austeniticstainlesssteelAISI304[J].Mater.Sci.andEng.,1999,A264:1-16
[11]GeDF,DingYP,XuXL.Studyonshotpeeningofalloy800for productionagainstSCCincausticsolution[J].PhysicalandChem icalAnalysis———FascicleofPhysics,1996,32(5):34-36(戈大钫,丁亚平,徐雪莲等.喷丸改善800合金传热关在高温苛性碱溶液中的应力腐蚀性能的研究[J].理化检测———物理分册,1996,32(5):34-36)
[12]ZhangYL.Analysisofstructurepropertyforaustenitic/bainite differentsteelweldjointinearly-and-mediumstageofopera tion[J].ThermalPowerGeneration,2002,31(1):28-30(章亚林.奥氏体/贝氏体/异种钢接头运行早中期组织性能分析[J].热力发电,2002,31(1):28-30)
[13]ZhangQS,DuYT.WeldingofStainlessSteel[M].Beijing:Me chanicalIndustryPress,2001(张其枢,堵耀庭.不锈钢焊接[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2001)
[1] 王欣彤, 陈旭, 韩镇泽, 李承媛, 王岐山. 硫酸盐还原菌作用下2205双相不锈钢在3.5%NaCl溶液中应力腐蚀开裂行为研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2021, 41(1): 43-50.
[2] 张浩, 杜楠, 周文杰, 王帅星, 赵晴. 模拟海水溶液中Fe3+对不锈钢点蚀的影响[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2020, 40(6): 517-522.
[3] 马鸣蔚, 赵志浩, 荆思文, 于文峰, 谷义恩, 王旭, 吴明. 17-4 PH不锈钢在含SRB的模拟海水中的应力腐蚀开裂行为研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2020, 40(6): 523-528.
[4] 朱丽霞, 贾海东, 罗金恒, 李丽锋, 金剑, 武刚, 胥聪敏. 外加电位对X80管线钢在轮南土壤模拟溶液中应力腐蚀行为的影响[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2020, 40(4): 325-331.
[5] 张震, 吴欣强, 谭季波. 电化学噪声原位监测应力腐蚀开裂的研究现状与进展[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2020, 40(3): 223-229.
[6] 陈旭,马炯,李鑫,吴明,宋博. 温度与SRB协同作用下X70钢在海泥模拟溶液中应力腐蚀行为研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2019, 39(6): 477-483.
[7] 黄宸,黄峰,张宇,刘海霞,刘静. 高强耐候钢焊接接头电偶腐蚀行为研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2019, 39(6): 527-535.
[8] 骆鸿,高书君,肖葵,董超芳,李晓刚. 磁控溅射工艺对CrN薄膜及其腐蚀行为的影响[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2019, 39(5): 423-430.
[9] 孙晓光,韩晓辉,张星爽,张志毅,李刚卿,董超芳. 超低碳奥氏体不锈钢焊接接头耐腐蚀性及环保型化学钝化工艺研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2019, 39(4): 345-352.
[10] 王保杰,栾吉瑜,王士栋,许道奎. 镁合金应力腐蚀开裂行为研究进展[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2019, 39(2): 89-95.
[11] 李兆登,崔振东,侯相钰,高丽丽,王维珍,尹建华. 核级316LN不锈钢焊接接头在高温高压水中的腐蚀性能研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2019, 39(2): 106-113.
[12] 彭文山,侯健,丁康康,郭为民,邱日,许立坤. 深海环境中304不锈钢腐蚀行为研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2019, 39(2): 145-151.
[13] 廖彤,马峥,李蕾蕾,马秀敏,王秀通,侯保荣. Fe2O3/TiO2纳米复合材料对304不锈钢的光生阴极保护性能[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2019, 39(1): 36-42.
[14] 刘辉,邱玮,冷滨,俞国军. 304和316H不锈钢在LiF-NaF-KF熔盐中的腐蚀行为研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2019, 39(1): 51-58.
[15] 张思齐,杜楠,王梅丰,王帅星,赵晴. 阴极面积对3.5%NaCl溶液中304不锈钢稳态点蚀生长速率的影响[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2018, 38(6): 551-557.