Please wait a minute...
中国腐蚀与防护学报  2026, Vol. 46 Issue (5): 1588-1594     CSTR: 32134.14.1005.4537.2025.339      DOI: 10.11902/1005.4537.2025.339
  研究报告 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 |
施镀流速对B30铜镍合金管内壁Ni-P化学镀层性能的影响研究
张红磊1(), 郑子奇2, 董凯辉2, 王政彬2, 宋影伟2, 郑玉贵2
1.海装沈阳局 沈阳 110031
2.中国科学院金属研究所 沈阳 110016
Performance Variation of Ni-P Coatings on Inner Wall of B30 Cu-Ni Alloy Tube Prepared with Chemical Plating Solution of Varying Flow Rates
ZHANG Honglei1(), ZHENG Ziqi2, DONG Kaihui2, WANG Zhengbin2, SONG Yingwei2, ZHENG Yugui2
1.Haizhuang Shenyang Bureau Military Representative Room, Shenyang 110031, China
2.Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
引用本文:

张红磊, 郑子奇, 董凯辉, 王政彬, 宋影伟, 郑玉贵. 施镀流速对B30铜镍合金管内壁Ni-P化学镀层性能的影响研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(5): 1588-1594.
Honglei ZHANG, Ziqi ZHENG, Kaihui DONG, Zhengbin WANG, Yingwei SONG, Yugui ZHENG. Performance Variation of Ni-P Coatings on Inner Wall of B30 Cu-Ni Alloy Tube Prepared with Chemical Plating Solution of Varying Flow Rates[J]. Journal of Chinese Society for Corrosion and protection, 2026, 46(5): 1588-1594.

全文: PDF(7890 KB)   HTML
摘要: 

Ni-P化学镀层因其优异的耐蚀性和耐磨性等性能,在海洋工程装备的腐蚀防护中得到了广泛应用。然而,针对海洋装备冷却系统常用的B30铜合金管,采用传统浸镀方法制备Ni-P镀层时,易因管内离子“空乏”与气泡堆积等因素影响镀层质量,而流动化学镀则有望解决该问题。流速是影响流动Ni-P化学镀层性能的关键,因此,明确施镀的最佳流速对获得高性能的Ni-P镀层意义重大。本文采用流动化学镀方法,通过控制不同的施镀流速,在B30铜镍合金管内表面制备除了Ni-P镀层,结合冲刷腐蚀测试、电化学测试及表面分析等方法,揭示了施镀流速对Ni-P镀层性能的影响。结果表明,流动化学镀的施镀流速会影响Ni-P镀层的表面形貌、沉积速率和耐蚀性能,但对镀层的成分、硬度和晶体结构基本没有影响。相比于B30合金,不同施镀流速条件下得到的Ni-P镀层均展现出更优异的耐冲刷腐蚀性能,其中,当施镀流速为1.6 L/min时,Ni-P镀层的耐冲刷腐蚀性能最佳。

关键词 : Ni-P化学镀,  B30铜镍合金管,  流动化学镀,  施镀流速,  冲刷腐蚀    
Abstract:

The chemical Ni-P coating has been widely used in corrosion protection of marine engineering equipment due to its excellent corrosion resistance and wear resistance. However, when traditional chemical plating is adopted to prepare Ni-P coating for the B30 Cu-Ni alloy tubes, which are commonly used for marine equipment cooling systems, the quality of the Ni-P coating is easily affected by ion “depletion” and difficulty in removing bubbles inside the tube. Flowing chemical plating is expected to solve this problem. However, the flow velocity of the chemical plating solution may be the key factor affecting the performance of the resulting Ni-P coating, so it is of great significance to clarify the optimal flow velocity of the chemical plating solution for obtaining high-performance Ni-P coatings. Hence, the chemical plating Ni-P coating was plated on the inner wall surface of B30 Cu-Ni alloy tube via a home-made electroless plating set for tubes with by varying the flowing rates of a designed plating solution. Then, the acquired coatings were characterized by means of erosion-corrosion test, electrochemical tests and surface morphology analysis etc., in terms of the effect of the flowing rates of plating solution on the quality of the plated coatings The results show that the flowing rate of chemical plating solution affects the surface morphology, deposition rate, and erosion-corrosion resistance of the Ni-P coating, but has few effects on the composition, hardness, and crystal structure of the coating. Compared to the bare B30 Cu-Ni alloy, the Ni-P coatings obtained under different flow rates of the plating solution all demonstrate superior erosion-corrosion resistance, among others the coating prepared with the chemical plating solution with flowing rate of 1.6 L/min exhibits the highest resistance to erosion-corrosion.

Key words: chemical Ni-P coating    B30 Cu-Ni alloy tube    flowing chemical plating    flow rate of plating solution    erosion-corrosion
收稿日期: 2025-10-30      32134.14.1005.4537.2025.339
ZTFLH:  TG174  
通讯作者: 张红磊,E-mail:zhanghonglei5281@163.com,研究方向为金属材料腐蚀与防护
Corresponding author: ZHANG Honglei, E-mail: zhanghonglei5281@163.com
作者简介: 张红磊,男,1987年生,硕士,工程师
图1  流动化学镀工艺示意图
图2  多通道管流式冲刷腐蚀实验装置
图3  Ni-P镀层的表面形貌和截面形貌
Ni-P coating / L·min-1PNi
0.88.491.6
1.28.591.5
1.69.091.0
表1  Ni-P镀层的成分分析结果 (mass fraction / %)
图4  Ni-P镀层的XRD图谱
图5  B30合金管和Ni-P镀层管的显微硬度(HV)
图6  B30合金管和Ni-P镀层管在人工海水中冲刷腐蚀3 d后的EIS测试结果
图7  B30合金管和Ni-P镀层管在人工海水中冲刷腐蚀3 d后的极化电阻
图8  B30合金管和Ni-P镀层管在人工海水中冲刷腐蚀3 d后的动电位极化曲线
图9  B30合金管和Ni-P镀层管在人工海水中冲刷腐蚀3 d后的自腐蚀电流密度
图10  B30合金管和Ni-P镀层管在人工海水中冲刷腐蚀3 d后的表面形貌
图11  Ni-P镀层管在人工海水中冲刷腐蚀3 d后的截面形貌
[1] Cheng D B, Guo Y, Liu X H, et al. Studies on corrosion and protection of heat exchange tubes of B30 copper-Nickel alloy [J]. Dev. Appl. Mater., 2020, 35(1): 84
[1] 程德彬, 郭 悦, 刘雪辉 等. B30铜镍合金换热管腐蚀与防护研究进展 [J]. 材料开发与应用, 2020, 35(1): 84
[2] Chang Q P, Chen Y Y, An Z D, et al. Corrosion resistance of B30 copper-nickel alloy in simulated saline groundwater [J]. Corros. Prot., 2018, 39: 576
[2] 常钦鹏, 陈友媛, 安振东 等. 模拟地下咸水中B30铜镍合金的耐蚀性 [J]. 腐蚀与防护, 2018, 39: 576
[3] Lu J, Wu J Y. Review on research and application of Cu-Ni alloys [J]. Nonferrous Met. Mater. Eng., 2020, 41(3): 55
[3] 陆 菁, 武家艳. 铜镍合金的研究及其应用综述 [J]. 有色金属材料与工程, 2020, 41(3): 55
[4] Shi Z Y, Liu B, Liu Y, et al. Progress of corrosion behavior and anti-corrosion technology for typical copper-nickel alloys under marine environment [J]. Equip. Environ. Eng., 2020, 17(8): 38
[4] 石泽耀, 刘 斌, 刘 岩 等. 典型铜镍合金在海洋环境中腐蚀行为与防护技术研究进展 [J]. 装备环境工程, 2020, 17(8): 38
[5] Wang L F, Shang M C, Gao X Y, et al. Effect of inherent films resulted from manufacturing process on corrosion of B30 Cu-Ni alloy [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Prot., 2025, 45: 1575
[5] 王立芳, 商孟超, 高希钰 等. B30铜镍合金原始膜对其腐蚀的影响 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45: 1575
doi: 10.11902/1005.4537.2025.037
[6] Jin Z T, Song Q N, Liu Q, et al. Long-term corrosion behavior of three Cu-alloys in 3.5%NaCl solutions with different pH values [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Prot., 2025, 45: 506
[6] 靳振廷, 宋亓宁, 刘 琪 等. 铜合金在不同pH值3.5%NaCl溶液中的浸泡腐蚀性能研究 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45: 506
doi: 10.11902/1005.4537.2024.215
[7] Liu P, Chen Y Y. Progress research on evolution and failure behavior of surface coating of B30 copper-nickel alloy pipe [J]. Dev. Appl. Mater., 2023, 38(6): 1
[7] 刘 鹏, 陈雨雨. B30铜镍合金管材表面膜层演化及失效行为研究进展 [J]. 材料开发与应用, 2023, 38(6): 1
[8] Wang L, Lin C G, Su Y, et al. Study on the biological fouling and corrosion of copper surface in typical sea area [J]. Equip. Environ. Eng., 2021, 18(8): 52
[8] 王 利, 蔺存国, 苏 艳 等. 典型海域船舶用铜材表面生物污损与腐蚀性能研究 [J]. 装备环境工程, 2021, 18(8): 52
[9] Li Y. Application of electroless plating nickel on protecting heat exchangers in ship [J]. Dev. Appl. Mater., 2001, 16(6): 20
[9] 李 异. 化学镀镍在舰船冷却器防护中的应用 [J]. 材料开发与应用, 2001, 16(6): 20
[10] Cui Z S, Li X T, Yao Q F. Research on application of chemical plating in anticorrosion of warship sea-water pipe [J]. China Shiprepair, 2011, 24(1): 25
[10] 崔忠善, 李雪亭, 姚祺峰. 化学镀技术在舰船海水管道防腐中的应用研究 [J]. 中国修船, 2011, 24(1): 25
[11] Sun C, Li J K, Shuang S, et al. Effect of defect on corrosion behavior of electroless Ni-P coating in CO2-saturated NaCl solution [J]. Corros. Sci., 2018, 134: 23
doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2018.01.041
[12] Jiang B, Jiang S L, Ma A L, et al. Erosion-corrosion behavior of electroless Ni-P coating on copper-nickel alloy in 3.5wt.% sodium chloride solution [J]. J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2014, 23: 230
doi: 10.1007/s11665-013-0763-0
[13] Balaraju J N, Selvi V E, Grips V K W, et al. Electrochemical studies on electroless ternary and quaternary Ni-P based alloys [J]. Electrochim. Acta, 2006, 52: 1064
doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.07.001
[14] Li N, Wang H J, Yang Y E. Electroless nickel plating on inner wall of slender tubes [J]. Electropl. Pollut. Control, 1994, 14(5): 9
[14] 李 宁, 王鸿建, 杨银娥. 细长管内壁无电解流镀镍 [J]. 电镀与环保, 1994, 14(5): 9
[15] Zhang X L, Wang S W. Study on reduced pressure electroless plating of M-P alloy on inner wall of slender tubes [J]. Mater. Prot., 1996, 29(1): 21
[15] 张秀玲, 王书伟. 细长管内壁减压化学镀M-P合金的研究 [J]. 材料保护, 1996, 29(1): 21
[16] Wang L S, Zhang X Y, Lin C G, et al. Uniform electroless nickel plating on the inner mall of long aluminum tube with small diameter [J]. Mater. Prot., 2008, 41(5): 39
[16] 王林山, 张小勇, 林晨光 等. 细长管内孔均匀化学镀镍的研究 [J]. 材料保护, 2008, 41(5): 39
[1] 王彦峰, 王流火, 孙仕达, 刘琦, 李亚梅, 王显宗. 柔直换流阀冷却系统关键材料失效与缓解措施研究进展[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(3): 653-662.
[2] 钟振坤, 关蕾, 傅汉龙, 王俊, 刘淼然, 揭敢新. 模拟海洋大气环境下冲刷载荷对Q355钢的腐蚀规律研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(3): 717-729.
[3] 胡宗武, 刘建国, 王钰, 李楷. 含砂3.5%NaCl溶液中90°弯管冲刷腐蚀损伤机制研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(2): 611-619.
[4] 马晓, 徐雪磊, 仝宏韬, 王鑫, 赵铭钰, 王璇, 沈杰, 刘广义. 流动海水冲刷下B10铜镍合金海水调节阀腐蚀特性研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(1): 283-290.
[5] 孟庆元, 代鹏宇, 张瑜, 杨彦哲, 李沈典, 刘福贵. 加氢型酸性水汽提装置塔顶空冷腐蚀泄漏分析研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45(5): 1450-1458.
[6] 彭文山, 邢少华, 钱峣, 蔺存国, 侯健, 张大磊. 流动海水冲刷下TA2纯钛管路钝化膜腐蚀特性研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2024, 44(4): 1038-1046.
[7] 傅江悦, 郭建喜, 杨延格, 冷哲, 王文. 单相流冲刷条件下一种低合金高强钢的腐蚀行为研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2024, 44(3): 585-600.
[8] 邢少华, 彭文山, 钱峣, 李相波, 马力, 张大磊. 海水流速对经抛光和钝化表面处理的2205不锈钢点蚀的影响[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2024, 44(3): 658-668.
[9] 王晓, 李明, 刘峰, 王忠平, 李相波, 李宁旺. 温度对B10铜镍合金管冲刷腐蚀行为影响规律研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2023, 43(6): 1329-1338.
[10] 高秋英, 曾文广, 王恒, 刘元聪, 扈俊颖. 流体冲刷作用对SRB的腐蚀行为影响研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2023, 43(5): 1087-1093.
[11] 杨新宇, 李祯, 段体岗, 黄国胜, 马力, 刘峰, 姜丹. 70Cu-30Ni合金管FeSO4预成膜及冲刷腐蚀行为分析[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2023, 43(3): 561-568.
[12] 王晓, 刘峰, 李焰, 张威, 李相波. 静态和动态海水中B10铜镍合金管的腐蚀行为研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2023, 43(1): 119-126.
[13] 杨湘愚, 关蕾, 李雨, 张永康, 王冠, 闫德俊. 基于正交试验的90°弯管冲刷腐蚀数值模拟及实验研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2022, 42(6): 979-987.
[14] 任莹, 赵会军, 周昊, 张建伟, 刘雯, 杨足膺, 王磊. 粒径和温度对20号钢冲刷腐蚀协同作用的影响[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2021, 41(4): 508-516.
[15] 胡宗武, 刘建国, 邢蕊, 尹法波. 单相流条件下90°水平弯管冲刷腐蚀行为研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2020, 40(2): 115-122.