Please wait a minute...
中国腐蚀与防护学报  2026, Vol. 46 Issue (5): 1560-1568     CSTR: 32134.14.1005.4537.2025.325      DOI: 10.11902/1005.4537.2025.325
  研究报告 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 |
Al含量对Mg-xAl-Zn合金耐腐蚀性能的影响
王兴斌1, 李家民1, 伍登骏1, 唐伟能2, 杨静1, 郭嘉成2(), 杨欣宇2, 侯娟1()
1.上海理工大学材料与化学学院 上海 200082
2.中国宝武钢铁集团宝钢金属有限公司 上海 200940
Effect of Al-Contents on Corrosion Resistance of Mg-xAl-Zn Alloys
WANG Xingbin1, LI Jiamin1, WU Dengjun1, TANG Weineng2, YANG Jing1, HOU Juan2(), GUO Jiacheng2, YANG Xinyu1()
1.School of Materials and Chemistry, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200082, China
2.Baosteel Metal Co. Ltd., China Baowu Steel Group, Shanghai 200940, China
引用本文:

王兴斌, 李家民, 伍登骏, 唐伟能, 杨静, 郭嘉成, 杨欣宇, 侯娟. Al含量对Mg-xAl-Zn合金耐腐蚀性能的影响[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(5): 1560-1568.
Xingbin WANG, Jiamin LI, Dengjun WU, Weineng TANG, Jing YANG, Juan HOU, Jiacheng GUO, Xinyu YANG. Effect of Al-Contents on Corrosion Resistance of Mg-xAl-Zn Alloys[J]. Journal of Chinese Society for Corrosion and protection, 2026, 46(5): 1560-1568.

全文: PDF(24489 KB)   HTML
摘要: 

镁合金因其轻质高强度特性, 在航空航天、汽车制造等领域具有广泛应用前景,然而较差的耐腐蚀性能限制了它的广泛应用。本文旨在系统研究Al含量对Mg-xAl-Zn (x = 3、6、8)合金微观结构及腐蚀性能的影响。通过挤压工艺制备Al含量不同的合金,采用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、X射线衍射仪(XRD)分析其微观结构和物相组成。利用电化学测试、析氢测试及失重测量等方法评估合金在3.5%NaCl溶液中的腐蚀行为。结果显示,Al含量的增加会促进β-Al12Mg17相的析出,金属间化合物的形态和分布对合金的腐蚀性能具有显著影响。在腐蚀过程中β-Al12Mg17相会作为阴极相加速镁合金的腐蚀。一般情况下,阴、阳极面积比越大,合金的电偶腐蚀速率就越大。在腐蚀过程中合金表面生成的钝化膜可以起到一定的保护作用从而提高耐腐蚀性。总之,随着Al含量的增加,合金的耐腐蚀性能先升高后降低,其中AZ61 (Mg-6Al-Zn)合金表现出最佳的耐腐蚀性。

关键词 : Mg-xAl-Zn合金,  金属间化合物,  电化学,  腐蚀性能    
Abstract:

Mg-alloys have broad application prospects in fields such as aerospace and automotive manufacturing due to their lightweight and high-strength characteristics. However, their poor corrosion resistance limits their widespread application. This study aims to systematically investigate the effect of different Al contents on the microstructure and corrosion behavior of Mg-xAl-Zn (x = 3, 6, 8) alloys. Alloys with varying Al contents were prepared by extrusion, and their microstructures and phase compositions were analyzed using Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and X-ray Diffractometer(XRD). The corrosion behavior of the alloys in 3.5%NaCl solution was evaluated through electrochemical tests, hydrogen evolution measurements, and mass loss analysis. Increasing the Al content facilitates the precipitation of the β-Al12Mg17 phase, and the morphology and distribution of this intermetallic compound significantly affect the corrosion properties of the alloys. During corrosion, the β-Al12Mg17 phase acts as a cathodic site, thereby accelerating the corrosion of the Mg-matrix. In general, a larger cathode-to-anode area ratio results in a higher galvanic corrosion rate. A compact surface film formed during the corrosion process of an alloy can provide certain degree of protective effect, thereby improving its corrosion resistance. It follows that as the Al content increases, the corrosion resistance of the alloy first improves and then decreases, among others, the AZ61 (Mg-6Al-Zn) alloy exhibits the best corrosion resistance.

Key words: Mg-xAl-Zn alloy    intermetallic    electrochemistry    corrosion performance
收稿日期: 2025-10-23      32134.14.1005.4537.2025.325
ZTFLH:  TG174  
基金资助:核电安全技术与装备国家重点实验室开放基金(SKL-2024-TS-03)
通讯作者: 侯 娟,E-mail:hou18217727686@163.com,研究方向为核电/航空航天/医疗领域金属增材制造技术
Corresponding author: HOU Juan, E-mail: hou18217727686@163.com
作者简介: 王兴斌,男,2001年生,硕士生
AlloyMgAlZnMnFe
AZ31Bal.2.790.850.260.002
AZ61Bal.6.090.980.270.002
AZ80Bal.8.230.960.330.002
表1  不同Al含量Mg-xAl-Zn合金的化学成分
图1  不同Al含量Mg-xAl-Zn合金的XRD谱
图2  不同Al含量Mg-xAl-Zn合金的光学显微图
AlloyGrain size / μmβ-phase contentArea fraction / %
AZ3133.2220211.10
AZ6119.1264711.62
AZ8014.6287622.74
表2  不同Al含量Mg-xAl-Zn合金的晶粒尺寸、β相数量及面积分数
图3  不同Al含量Mg-xAl-Zn合金的SEM图像
图4  合金在3.5%NaCl溶液中浸泡4 d的析氢体积及合金的质量损失率
图5  不同Al含量Mg-xAl-Zn合金在3.5%NaCl溶液中腐蚀不同时间后的宏观腐蚀形貌
图6  不同Al含量Mg-xAl-Zn合金在3.5%NaCl溶液中腐蚀48 h后的SEM图及元素分布
图7  不同Al含量Mg-xAl-Zn合金在3.5%NaCl溶液中的电化学阻抗谱
AlloyRs / Ω·cm2Rct / Ω·cm2Ydl / Ω-1·cm-2·S nndlRL / Ω·cm2L / H·cm2Ydl / Ω-1·cm-2·S nndlRf / Ω·cm2
AZ3117.7413851.406 × 10-50.9916--6.707 × 10-60.9916272
AZ6118.6321569.919 × 10-60.9638121811940---
AZ8019.53991.58.399 × 10-50.9192653.310790---
表3  不同Al含量Mg-xAl-Zn合金在3.5%NaCl溶液中的电化学阻抗拟合结果
图8  不同Al含量Mg-xAl-Zn合金在3.5%NaCl溶液中的极化曲线
AlloyEcorr / V vs. AgClIcorr / mA·cm-2Rp / Ω·cm2
AZ31-1.67590.9947991.4
AZ61-1.6360.67391218
AZ80-1.62681.2458268.8
表4  不同Al含量Mg-xAl-Zn合金在3.5%NaCl溶液中的极化参数
[1] Song J F, She J, Chen D L, et al. Latest research advances on magnesium and magnesium alloys worldwide [J]. J. Mag. Alloy., 2020, 8: 1
[2] Li J W, Qiu Y M, Yang J J, et al. Effect of grain refinement induced by wire and arc additive manufacture (WAAM) on the corrosion behaviors of AZ31 magnesium alloy in NaCl solution [J]. J. Mag. Alloy., 2023, 11: 217
[3] Kang J H, Park J, Song K, et al. Microstructure analyses and phase-field simulation of partially divorced eutectic solidification in hypoeutectic Mg-Al Alloys [J]. J. Mag. Alloy., 2022, 10: 1672
[4] He C, Liu W H, Yang Y, et al. Schematic diagram illustrating the corrosion reaction in Mg-Li-Al-Ca alloy with and without β-Li phase [J]. J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2024, 30: 4510
doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.04.175
[5] Wang J P, Zou J C, Huang Z Q. Comparative study on corrosion behaviors of Mg-xAl-Zn (x = 3, 6, 9) alloys [J]. J. Funct. Mater., 2022, 53: 2193
[5] 王军朋, 邹金超, 黄志权. Mg-xAl-Zn (x = 3, 6, 9)合金腐蚀行为比较研究 [J]. 功能材料, 2022, 53: 2193
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9731.2022.02.029
[6] Guo C Q, Liu L, Liu H, et al. Effect of indium and yttrium on the corrosion behavior of AZ63 magnesium alloy [J]. J. Alloy. Compd., 2024, 985: 174068
doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.174068
[7] Olugbade T O, Omiyale B O, Ojo O T. Corrosion, corrosion fatigue, and protection of magnesium alloys: Mechanisms, measurements, and mitigation [J]. J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2022, 31: 1707
doi: 10.1007/s11665-021-06355-2
[8] Du X, Zhang M C, Duan S C, et al. Research status of high corrosion-resistant Zn-Al-Mg coating [J]. Chin. J. Eng., 2019, 41: 847
[8] 杜 昕, 张满仓, 段生朝 等. 高耐蚀锌铝镁镀层研究现状 [J]. 工程科学学报, 2019, 41: 847
[9] Grimm M, Lohmüller A, Singer R F, et al. Influence of the microstructure on the corrosion behaviour of cast Mg-Al alloys [J]. Corros. Sci., 2019, 155: 195
doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2019.04.024
[10] Yang X J, Deng B Y, Zou W F, et al. Effects of Ti-Al intermediate alloy on microstructure and corrosion performance of AZ91D alloy [J]. Spec. Cast. Nonferrous Alloy., 2024, 44: 577
[10] 杨湘杰, 邓博焰, 邹伟峰 等. Ti-Al中间合金对AZ91D镁合金组织及腐蚀性能的影响 [J]. 特种铸造及有色合金, 2024, 44: 577
[11] Neetu, Ireddy N, Panda S S, et al. Effect of aluminum content on the crevice corrosion behavior of magnesium alloys [J]. Trans. Indian Inst. Met., 2024, 77: 1265
doi: 10.1007/s12666-023-03175-x
[12] Fu G Y, Yang L F, Xue F. Corrosion resistance of AZ91D magnesium alloy under different treatment processes [J]. Spec. Cast. Nonferrous Alloy., 2024, 44: 633
[12] 付广艳, 杨龙飞, 薛 丰. 不同工艺处理下AZ91D镁合金耐腐蚀性能研究 [J]. 特种铸造及有色合金, 2024, 44: 633
[13] Lu X, Zhao G Q, Zhou J X, et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of Mg-3.0Zn-1.0Sn-0.3Mn-0.3Ca alloy extruded at different temperatures [J]. J. Alloy. Compd., 2018, 732: 257
doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.10.210
[14] Yu H R, Zhang W L, Cui Z Y. Difference in corrosion behavior of four Mg-alloys in Cl--NH 4 + -NO 3 - containing solution [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Prot., 2020, 40: 553
[14] 于浩冉, 张文丽, 崔中雨. 4种镁合金在Cl--NH 4 + -NO 3 - 溶液体系中的腐蚀行为差异研究 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2020, 40: 553
doi: 10.11902/1005.4537.2019.250
[15] Li J Y, Liu H, Liu L, et al. Effect of aluminum and zinc on the corrosion behavior of AZ (Mg-Al-Zn) series magnesium alloys [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2026, 246: 116
doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2025.04.007
[16] Li J R, Chen Z Y, Jing J P, et al. Effect of yttrium modification on the corrosion behavior of AZ63 magnesium alloy in sodium chloride solution [J]. J. Mag. Alloy., 2021, 9: 613
[17] Qin Q W, Ma H B, Liang L, et al. Effect of heat-treatment on corrosion behavior of Mg-4Gd-2Nd alloy [J]. J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2024, 29: 3156
doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.02.045
[18] Du Y Z, Wang X, Liu D J, et al. Corrosion behavior of a Mg-Zn-Ca-La alloy in 3.5wt%NaCl solution [J]. J. Mag. Alloy., 2022, 10: 527
[19] Ishizaki T, Miyashita T, Inamura M, et al. Effect of Al content in the Mg-based alloys on the composition and corrosion resistance of composite hydroxide films formed by steam coating [J]. Materials, 2019, 12: 1188
doi: 10.3390/ma12071188
[20] Sivashanmugam N, Harikrishna K L. A review on the corrosion performance of magnesium alloys in biomedical applications [J]. Eng. Proc., 2024, 61: 19
[21] Al Bach S, Aubert I, Devos O, et al. Corrosion of pure and milled Mg17Al12 in “model” seawater solution [J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45: 15805
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.030
[1] 黎敏, 魏高飞, 邓书端, 李向红. 扫描电化学显微镜(SECM)在缓蚀剂研究中的进展与展望[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(5): 1326-1342.
[2] 郑凯, 王艺陶, 王东胜, 刘伟, 蒋颖畅, 黄嵘, 常雪婷. 腐蚀-应力耦合作用对极地船用螺旋桨低碳马氏体不锈钢失效机理影响研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(5): 1452-1462.
[3] 曹天慧, 杨砚淇, 刘雨薇, 吴磊, 郭泉忠, 贾志刚, 曹公望, 汪川. 23MnNiMoCr54钢在不同pH的模拟高矿化水中腐蚀机理研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(5): 1537-1548.
[4] 叶海锋, 沈书成, 陈江华. 增材制造316L不锈钢在不同温度海水环境中的腐蚀行为研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(5): 1569-1578.
[5] 黄胡灵彤, 王成, 程学群, 杨小佳, 张占武, 黎亮. Q235碳钢在模拟南疆土壤中的腐蚀行为[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(5): 1595-1604.
[6] 俞春林, 顾铭飞, 孙一昂, 袁可鑫, 杨静, 王丽熙, 朱承飞, 朱海奎. 海洋环境中316不锈钢表面喷涂粉末涂层的耐久性评估[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(5): 1627-1633.
[7] 雍兴跃, 董晓梅, 高新华, 李卓玄, 陈燕飞, 纪灏天. 电化学阻抗谱在有机涂层研究中的应用[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(4): 945-961.
[8] 柯定芳, 吴芳芳, 朱兆彬, 谢声益, 洪静, 陈悦, 李亮, 李昊, 曹发和. 氧化石墨烯/铈基金属有机框架构筑高稳定长耐蚀防护涂层[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(4): 1095-1106.
[9] 黄涛, 朱宇, 邓宇, 王岐山, 田一晨, 陈旭. 氢对X65钢及其焊缝力学性能及腐蚀行为影响[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(4): 1107-1116.
[10] 徐慧强, 赖长清, 王茜茜, 王子明. 基于海水循环模拟系统的牺牲阳极材料对B30传热管腐蚀行为影响研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(4): 1139-1147.
[11] 夏晓健, 张晨宇, 严康骅, 张波, 邓晨曦, 谢宇鹏, 闵星瑞, 李梦妤, 张瑞丰. 含微量Er铝合金导线力学性能与腐蚀行为研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(4): 1177-1184.
[12] 周炜龙, 郭玉冰, 胡梦茹, 沈凯杰, 杨正桓, 谢林君. 磷酸钠浓度对40Cr钢耐蚀性能的影响[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(4): 1185-1196.
[13] 陆海峰, 缪强, 梁文萍, 姚志猛, 魏少翀, 陈国星. 激光清洗对不锈钢表面耐腐蚀性能的影响[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(4): 1227-1237.
[14] 林莉, 毕诗浩, 付磊, 蹇科, 张千. D-酪氨酸增强AH36船体钢四羟甲基硫酸磷杀菌腐蚀防护效用研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(4): 1238-1248.
[15] 李自立, 王欣纪, 田春洋, 叶沛聪, 刘海乔, 何成刚, 刘吉华. NaCl溶液温度和含量对热处理后钢轨腐蚀行为的影响[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(4): 1279-1288.