Please wait a minute...
Journal of Chinese Society for Corrosion and protection  2026, Vol. 46 Issue (4): 1296-1304    DOI: 10.11902/1005.4537.2026.046
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Research on Monitoring and Evaluation Model for Sacrificial Anodes in Seawater Pipelines
ZHANG Qiang1,2(), LI De3, XIAO Diaobin1, XIONG Zhuang3, SUN Wen2
1.China Nuclear Power Operation Technology Co. Ltd., Wuhan 430223, China
2.School of Chemical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
3.Sanmen Nuclear Power Co. Ltd., Taizhou 317109, China
Cite this article: 

ZHANG Qiang, LI De, XIAO Diaobin, XIONG Zhuang, SUN Wen. Research on Monitoring and Evaluation Model for Sacrificial Anodes in Seawater Pipelines. Journal of Chinese Society for Corrosion and protection, 2026, 46(4): 1296-1304.

Download:  HTML  PDF(3467KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

As a protective means sacrificial anode is an effective method of corrosion prevention for seawater pipelines in coastal power plants. However, to monitor its operation parameters, such as the consumption status of sacrificial anodes within seawater pipelines, remaining lifespan, and the intensity of protective current etc. is quite challenging. In this study, a specific section of Q235 steel seawater pipeline equipped with A21E-2 sacrificial anodes was selected to attempt to acquire the relevant output current and remaining capacity of those sacrificial anodes, and to evaluate their remaining service life. For this purpose, a numerical simulation model for the entire process of sacrificial anode cathodic protection is established by using the finite element method and applying appropriate polarization boundary conditions. This model takes into account the real-time changes in the corrosive environment, including temperature and flow velocity, and was optimized using digital twin technology. Compared with the measured data, the prediction accuracy of this model exceeds 80%.

Key words:  coastal power plant      numerical simulation      sacrificial anode      polarization surface      seawater pipeline     
Received:  06 February 2026      32134.14.1005.4537.2026.046
ZTFLH:  TG174  
Fund: Research and Development Projects of CNNP(K220514)
Corresponding Authors:  ZHANG Qiang, E-mail: zhangqiang06@cnnp.com

URL: 

https://www.jcscp.org/EN/10.11902/1005.4537.2026.046     OR     https://www.jcscp.org/EN/Y2026/V46/I4/1296

Fig.1  Geometric model of experimental setup
No.Anode dimensions / mm × mm × mmMass/ kgSacrificial anode remaining
A80 × (20 + 28) × 150.07776100%
B80 × (15 + 21) × 120.04665660%
C80 × (9 + 10.2) × 7.50.01555220%
Table 1  Dimensions and mass of the A21E-2 sacrificial anodes with different remaining quantities
Fig.2  Polarization curves of the A21E-2 anode at different flow velocities (0-1.8 m/s) at 10 ℃ (a), 20 ℃ (b), and 30 ℃ (c)
Fig.3  Polarization curves of Q235 steel at different flow velocities (0-1.8 m/s) at 10 ℃ (a), 20 ℃ (b), and 30 ℃ (c)
Fig.4  Polarization surfaces of the A21E-2 anode (a) and Q235 steel (b) at 20 ℃
Anode remaining rateSeawater flow rate / m·s-1Average measured value / mA
100%037
100%0.246
100%0.666
60%026
60%0.233
60%0.642
20%019
20%0.223
20%0.634
Table 2  Experimental data for typical operating conditions in the flowing water test
Fig.5  Theoretical output current data of the anode for all conditions supplemented by interpolation
Fig.6  Simulation results of anode output current under different operating conditions (a) and 3D schematic of the original data and fitted data surfaces (b)
Fig.7  Contour of flow field distribution inside the experimental setup at 100% anode remaining and a flow velocity of 0.8 m/s
Fig.8  Contour of electrode potential distribution (a-c) and contour of electrode current density distribution (d-f) inside the experimental setup at a flow velocity of 0.8 m/s and anode remaining of 100% (a, d), 60% (b, e), and 20% (c, f) (Unit: V)
Fig.9  Simulation predictions of anode output current under different flow velocities and different anode remaining quantities
Anode remaining rateSeawater flow rate / m·s-1Measured current, I / mAPredicted Current, I′ / mADeviation rate
100%03731.0416.12%
100%0.24637.3818.73%
100%0.66653.4319.04%
60%02626.96-3.71%
60%0.23334.47-4.44%
60%0.64249.09-16.88%
20%01921.36-12.41%
20%0.22326.29-14.29%
20%0.63439.95-17.50%
Table 3  Comparison between predicted and measured values of sacrificial anode output current
[1] Zhu G, Gao S C, Huang W, et al. Research progress on corrosion failures of typical components of seawater pipelines [J]. Corros. Prot., 2024, 45(9): 45
朱 光, 高顺长, 黄 玮 等. 海水管路典型部件腐蚀失效研究进展 [J]. 腐蚀与防护, 2024, 45(9): 45
[2] Qiao Z, Zhao X B, Chen P, et al. Analysis on pipeline corrosion perforation of auxiliary cooling water system at Fuqing nuclear power plant [J]. Corros. Sci. Prot. Technol., 2017, 29: 209
乔 泽, 赵兴保, 陈 平 等. 福清核电辅助冷却水系统管道腐蚀穿孔原因分析 [J]. 腐蚀科学与防护技术, 2017, 29: 209
[3] Zeng R H, Peng Y H, Zhang W. Protection measures against erosion of seawater pipeline of ships [J]. Chin. J. Ship Res., 2009, 4(3): 74
曾荣辉, 彭玉辉, 张 威. 船舶海水管路防腐蚀研究 [J]. 中国舰船研究, 2009, 4(3): 74
[4] Xu L K, Xin Y L, Ma L, et al. Challenges and solutions of cathodic protection for marine ships [J]. Corros. Commun., 2021, 2: 33
doi: 10.1016/j.corcom.2021.08.003
[5] Xu L K, Ma L, Xing S H, et al. Review on cathodic protection for marine structures [J]. Mater. China, 2014, 33: 106
许立坤, 马 力, 邢少华 等. 海洋工程阴极保护技术发展评述 [J]. 中国材料进展, 2014, 33: 106
[6] Zhang J L. Cathodic protection for inner wall of seawater pipelines: Sacrificial anode method [J]. Mar. Sci., 1984, (5): 60
张经磊. 海水管道内壁阴极保护—牺牲阳极法 [J]. 海洋科学, 1984, (5): 60
[7] Li X, Wei Y P, Li H T, et al. Analysis and discussion of offshore pipeline cathodic protection [J]. Mod. Chem. Ind., 2016, 36(10): 205
李 雪, 魏艳平, 李海涛 等. 海洋管道阴极保护技术分析与探讨 [J]. 现代化工, 2016, 36(10): 205
[8] Sun W D. Evaluation method and application of effectiveness of sacrificial anode cathodic protection for offshore submarine oil pipeline [J]. Corros. Prot., 2024, 45(1): 93
孙伟栋. 近海海底管道阴极保护有效性的评估方法及应用 [J]. 腐蚀与防护, 2024, 45(1): 93
[9] Zheng Z L, Ji C L, Xu H Q, et al. Simulation analysis of cathodic protection effectiveness using sacrificial anode for marine condenser [J]. J. Eng. Therm. Energy Power, 2025, 40(8): 131
郑忠良, 季晨龙, 徐慧强 等. 船用冷凝器牺牲阳极阴极保护效用仿真分析 [J]. 热能动力工程, 2025, 40(8): 131
[10] Wang H, Xu S, Luo W H, et al. Simulation of long-term cathodic protection effect of sacrificial anode for steel shell of immersed tunnel [J]. Corros. Prot., 2025, 46(6): 50
王 辉, 许 实, 罗维华 等. 沉管隧道钢壳牺牲阳极长期阴极保护效果模拟 [J]. 腐蚀与防护, 2025, 46(6): 50
[11] Li J W, Zhu W. Sacrificial anodes cathodic protection effect on adjacent heat exchange tubes of a water cooler by numerical simulation [J]. Corros. Prot., 2025, 46(4): 91
李军威, 朱 巍. 采用数值模拟法研究某水冷器管箱牺牲阳极对邻近换热管的阴极保护作用 [J]. 腐蚀与防护, 2025, 46(4): 91
[12] Wang K, Li C P, Li Y H, et al. Multi-physics analysis of the galvanic corrosion of Mg-steel couple under the influence of time-dependent anisotropic deposition film [J]. J. Magnes. Alloy., 2021, 9: 866
doi: 10.1016/j.jma.2020.11.022
[13] Yin L T, Li W C, Wang Y C, et al. Numerical simulation of micro-galvanic corrosion of Al alloys: Effect of density of Al(OH)3 precipitate [J]. Electrochim. Acta, 2019, 324: 134847
doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.134847
[14] Liu G C, Sun W, Wang L D. A mathematical model with piecewise nonlinear boundary for sacrificial anode cathodic protection in sea water [J]. Corros. Prot., 2012, 33: 876
刘贵昌, 孙 文, 王立达. 海水中牺牲阳极阴极保护的分段非线性边界数学模型 [J]. 腐蚀与防护, 2012, 33: 876
[15] Li S, Bao X W, Hao A F, et al. Optimization of boundary conditions for numerical model of galvanic corrosion [J]. Mod. Chem. Ind., 2023, 43(11): 121
李 双, 鲍学伟, 郝安峰 等. 电偶腐蚀数值模型的边界条件优化研究 [J]. 现代化工, 2023, 43(11): 121
[16] Kennell G F, Evitts R W, Heppner K L. A critical crevice solution and IR drop crevice corrosion model [J]. Corros. Sci., 2008, 50: 1716
doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2008.02.020
[1] XU Huiqiang, LAI Changqing, WANG Xixi, WANG Ziming. Influence of Sacrificial Anode Materials on Corrosion Behavior of B30 Cu-Ni Alloy Heat Transfer Tubes in a Simulated System of Circulating Seawater[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(4): 1139-1147.
[2] WANG Mengmeng, CAO Guomin, MENG Fanxing, LI Tianliang, SONG Qinfeng, SHAN Taihang, DONG Liang. Influence of Concrete Counterweight Layer on Cathodic Protection Effect of Nearshore Submarine Steel Pipes[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2026, 46(3): 680-692.
[3] GUO Zihan, FAN Jianchun, YANG Yunpeng, ZHANG Jun, DAI Siwei. Erosion Characteristics of High-pressure Tee Manifold Under Dynamic Load[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45(3): 698-708.
[4] XIAO Qikun, MA Jun, GUO Kai, XIONG Xin, YUAN Haoran. Numerical Simulation of Erosion Wear in Slurry Pipeline Based on DDPM-RSM[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2025, 45(3): 709-719.
[5] ZHANG Juhuan, LIU Jing, PENG Jingjing, ZHANG Xian, WU Kaiming. Electrochemical Performance of a Novel Al-Zn-In-Sn-La Sacrificial Anode Alloy in Simulated Marine Environments[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2024, 44(5): 1223-1233.
[6] PENG Wenshan, XING Shaohua, QIAN Yao, LIN Cunguo, HOU Jian, ZHANG Dalei. Effect of Flowing Seawater on Corrosion Characteristics of Passivation Film on TA2 Pure-Ti Pipes[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2024, 44(4): 1038-1046.
[7] XING Shaohua, PENG Wenshan, QIAN Yao, LI Xiangbo, MA Li, ZHANG Dalei. Effect of Seawater Flow Velocity on Pitting Corrosion of 2205 Stainless Steel with Different Surface Treatments[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2024, 44(3): 658-668.
[8] XING Shaohua, LIU Zhongye, LIU Jinzeng, BAI Shuyu, QIAN Yao, ZHANG Dalei. Galvanic Corrosion Behavior of ZCuSn5Pb5Zn5/B10 Couple in Flowing Seawater[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2023, 43(6): 1339-1348.
[9] PAN Dailong, SI Xiaodong, LV Jinhong. Effect of Flow Velocity on Flow Accelerated Corrosion Rate of Carbon Steel Elbow[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2023, 43(5): 1064-1070.
[10] LUO Weihua, WANG Haitao, YU Lin, XU Shi, LIU Zhaoxin, GUO Yu, WANG Tingyong. Effect of Zn Content on Electrochemical Properties of Al-Zn-In-Mg Sacrificial Anode Alloy[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2023, 43(5): 1071-1078.
[11] KOU Jie, REN Zhe. Research Progress of Regional Cathodic Protection Potential Distribution of Tank Floor Based on Numerical Calculation[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2023, 43(4): 871-881.
[12] GUO Zihan, ZHANG Jun, LI Hui. Optimal Design for Anti-erosion of Pneumatic Conveying Elbow with Rib Structure[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2023, 43(3): 525-534.
[13] SHANG Xiaobiao, XIAO Renyou, LI Jiajian, ZHANG Zhihao. Improvement of Anode Corrosion Uniformity of Copper Electrolysis Cell Based on Multi-physical Field Coupling Theory[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2023, 43(3): 663-670.
[14] ZHANG Rui, CUI Yu, LIU Li, WANG Fuhui. Effect of Synergy of Water Pressure and Flow Speed on Free-corrosion Behavior of Al-Zn-In Sacrificial Anode in Deep-sea Envioronmem[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2023, 43(2): 329-336.
[15] XING Shaohua, LIU Jinzeng, BAI Shuyu, QIAN Yao, ZHANG Dalei, MA Li. Influence of Seawater Flow Speed on Galvanic Corrosion Behavior of B10/B30 Alloys Coupling[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2023, 43(2): 391-398.
No Suggested Reading articles found!