Please wait a minute...
Journal of Chinese Society for Corrosion and protection  2024, Vol. 44 Issue (2): 335-344    DOI: 10.11902/1005.4537.2023.333
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Simulation of Hydrogen Distribution in Pipeline with Double Corrosion Defects
GUO Shiwen1,2, WU Haozhi1,2, DONG Shaohua1,2(), CHEN Lin1,2, CHENG Frank3
1.School of Safety and Ocean Engineering, China University of Petroleum Beijing, Beijing 102249, China
2.Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Safety and Emergency Technology, Ministry of Emergency Management, University of Petroleum Beijing, Beijing 102249, China
3.Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary T2N 1N4, Canada
Cite this article: 

GUO Shiwen, WU Haozhi, DONG Shaohua, CHEN Lin, CHENG Frank. Simulation of Hydrogen Distribution in Pipeline with Double Corrosion Defects. Journal of Chinese Society for Corrosion and protection, 2024, 44(2): 335-344.

Download:  HTML  PDF(4375KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

To deliever mixed natural gas and hydrogen with the existed natural gas pipelines is an important way to achieve efficient hydrogen transportation. However, corrosion defects present on these aged pipelines will affect the diffusion and enrichment of hydrogen atoms, potentially causing hydrogen embrittlement in the pipeline steel and further leading to the pipeline failure. In addition, corrosion defects on pipelines often exist in the form of adjacent double corrosion defects and even multiple corrosion defect groups. The interaction between adjacent defects can complicate the hydrogen diffusion and enrichment behavior, and ultimately affect the hydrogen induced failure behavior of the pipeline. In order to study the distribution of hydrogen concentration on pipelines containing double corrosion defects, a finite element model coupled with stress field and diffusion field was developed. The influence mechanism of corrosion defect length, defect spacing and applied tensile strain on hydrogen diffusion and enrichment behavior in steel was investigated in terms of the stress coupling behavior between the two corrosion defects. The results showed that the existence of corrosion defects caused the accumulation of hydrogen atoms in steel, and the value and location of the maximum hydrogen concentration in accumulation area changed with tensile strain, defect length and defect spacing. However, when the distance between the two defects is large enough, they will not have a superposition effect on the hydrogen diffusion and enrichment, and thus they can be regarded as two independent defects. This study provides a theoretical reference for the safety assessment of hydrogen damage in hydrogen transmission pipelines with double corrosion defects.

Key words:  double corrosion defects      hydrogen distribution      finite element modeling      X52 pipeline steel     
Received:  23 October 2023      32134.14.1005.4537.2023.333
ZTFLH:  TE832  
Fund: Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum, Beijing(2462023BJRC020)
Corresponding Authors:  DONG Shaohua, E-mail: shdong@cup.edu.cn

URL: 

https://www.jcscp.org/EN/10.11902/1005.4537.2023.333     OR     https://www.jcscp.org/EN/Y2024/V44/I2/335

Fig.1  Schematic diagram of a two-dimensional pipe model with double internal corrosion defects
Fig. 2  Distributions of hydrostatic stress at single defect with length of 10 and 20 mm, double defects with spacing of 0, 5 and 10 mm under tensile strain of 0.5%
Fig.3  Distributions of hydrogen concentrations at single defect with a length of 20 mm and double defects with a spacing of 0 mm under tensile strains of 0% (a), 0.1% (b), 0.2% (c) and 3% (d)
Tensile strain / %Defect spacing/mm
05101520
01010101010
0.110.0710.0810.0910.0910.09
0.210.59#10.5310.5510.5310.53
0.510.99#11.15*10.9810.9210.92
111.18*11.89*11.68*11.1711.17
211.72*12.73*13.01*11.5611.56
312.06*12.95*13.91*12.0012.00
Table 1  Maximum hydrogen concentrations at double defects with different spacing under different tensile strains (mol/m3)
Fig.4  Distributions of hydrogen concentrations at double defects with different spacing (0, 5, 10 and 15 mm) under 0.5% tensile strain
Fig.5  Distributions of hydrogen concentrations at double defects with different spacing (0, 5, 10 and 15 mm) under 1% tensile strain
Fig.6  Linear distributions of hydrogen concentrations along the model bottom of double corrosion defects with a spacing of 0 mm (a), 5 mm (b), 10 mm (c) and 15 mm (d)
Tensile strain/%Defect length/mm
81012
0101010
0.110.1410.0910.06
0.210.7310.5510.43
0.511.2310.9810.79*
0.611.3211.08*10.95*
111.88*11.68*11.46*
213.21*13.01*12.53*
314.01*13.91*13.36*
Table 2  Maximum hydrogen concentrations at double defects with different lengths and different spacing under different tensile strains (mol/m3)
Fig.7  Distributions of hydrogen concentrations at double corrosion defects with a spacing of 10 mm under different tensile strains and defect lengths

Tensile strain

%

Defect spacing / mm
0

20 mm

single defect

101520

10 mm

single defect

0101010101010
0.110.0710.0210.0910.0910.0910.10
0.210.59#10.36#10.5510.5310.5310.58
0.510.99#10.64#10.9810.9210.9210.97
111.18*10.75#11.68*11.1711.1711.21
211.72*11.13&13.01*11.5611.5611.55
312.06*11.27&13.91*12.0012.0011.94&
Table 3  Maximum hydrogen concentrations at double defects and single defect (mol/m3)
Fig.8  Distributions of hydrogen concentrations at single defect with a length of 20 mm and double defects with a spacing of 0 mm under tensile strains of 0.5% and 0.1%
Fig.9  Distributions of hydrogen concentrations at double defects with a spacing of 15 mm and single defect with a length of 10 mm under tensile strains of 0.5% and 0.1%
Fig.10  Linear distributions of hydrogen concentrations along the model bottom of single corrosion defect with a length of 10 mm (a) and 20 mm (b)
1 Capurso T, Stefanizzi M, Torresi M, et al. Perspective of the role of hydrogen in the 21st century energy transition[J]. Energy Convers. Manage., 2022, 251: 114898
doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114898
2 Opinions of the State Council of the CPC Central Committee on completely, accurately and comprehensively implementing the new development concept and doing a good job of carbon peak and carbon neutralization[EB/OL]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-10/24/content_5644613.htm?eqid=e150e9910013963200000002647055a2, 2021-10-24
中共中央国务院关于完整准确全面贯彻新发展理念做好碳达峰碳中和工作的意见[EB/OL]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-10/24/content_5644613.htm?eqid=e150e9910013963200000002647055a2, 2021-10-24
3 Filippov S P, Yaroslavtsev A B. Hydrogen energy: development prospects and materials[J]. Russ. Chem. Rev., 2021, 90: 627
doi: 10.1070/RCR5014
4 Van Der Zwaan B C C, Schoots K, Rivera-Tinoco R, et al. The cost of pipelining climate change mitigation: An overview of the economics of CH4, CO2 and H2 transportation[J]. Appl. Energy, 2011, 88: 3821
doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.05.019
5 Tan K, Mahajan D, Venkatesh T A. Computational fluid dynamic modeling of methane-hydrogen mixture transportation in pipelines: Estimating energy costs[J]. MRS Adv., 2022, 7: 388
doi: 10.1557/s43580-022-00243-0
6 Hall J E, Hooker P, Jeffrey K E. Gas detection of hydrogen/natural gas blends in the gas industry[J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46: 12555
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.200
7 Ozturk M, Dincer I. A comprehensive review on power-to-gas with hydrogen options for cleaner applications[J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46: 31511
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.07.066
8 Dodds P E, Staffel I, Hawkes A D, et al. Hydrogen and fuel cell technologies for heating: A review[J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40: 2065
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.11.059
9 Zhou J, Horsley D, Rothwell B. Application of strain-based design for pipelines in permafrost areas[A]. 2006 International Pipeline Conference[C]. Calgary, 2006
10 Abdelmoety A K, Kainat M, Yoosef-Ghodsi N, et al. Strain-based reliability analysis of dented pipelines using a response surface method[J]. J. Pipeline Sci. Eng., 2022, 2: 29
doi: 10.1016/j.jpse.2021.11.002
11 Xu L Y, Cheng Y F. Reliability and failure pressure prediction of various grades of pipeline steel in the presence of corrosion defects and pre-strain[J]. Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 2012, 89: 75
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2011.09.008
12 Sun Y H, Cheng Y F. Thermodynamics of spontaneous dissociation and dissociative adsorption of hydrogen molecules and hydrogen atom adsorption and absorption on steel under pipelining conditions[J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46: 34469
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.07.217
13 Dadfarnia M, Sofronis P, Neeraj T. Hydrogen interaction with multiple traps: can it be used to mitigate embrittlement?[J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36: 10141
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.027
14 Ohaeri E, Eduok U, Szpunar J. Hydrogen related degradation in pipeline steel: a review[J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43: 14584
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.06.064
15 Louthan Jr M R. Strain localization and hydrogen embrittlement[J]. Scr. Metall., 1983, 17: 451
doi: 10.1016/0036-9748(83)90329-0
16 Song J, Curtin W A. Mechanisms of hydrogen-enhanced localized plasticity: an atomistic study using α-Fe as a model system[J]. Acta Mater., 2014, 68: 61
doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.008
17 He S, Ecker W, Pippan R, et al. Hydrogen-enhanced decohesion mechanism of the special Σ5(012)[100] grain boundary in Ni with Mo and C solutes[J]. Comput. Mater. Sci., 2019, 167: 100
doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.05.029
18 Koyama M, Tasan C C, Akiyama E, et al. Hydrogen-assisted decohesion and localized plasticity in dual-phase steel[J]. Acta Mater., 2014, 70: 174
doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.048
19 Sun Y H, Cheng Y F. Hydrogen-induced degradation of high-strength steel pipeline welds: a critical review[J]. Eng. Fail. Anal., 2022, 133: 105985
doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105985
20 API. API 579 Recommended practice for fitness-for-service[S]. Washington: API, 2000
21 ASME. ASME B31 G-2009 Manual for determining the remaining strength of corroded pipelines[S]. New York: ASME, 2009
22 DNV. DNV-RP-F101 Corroded pipelines[S]. Norway: DNV, 2015
23 British Standards Institution. BS 7910-2005 Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures[S]. London: BSI, 2005
24 National Energy Administration. SY/T 6151-2009 Assessment of corroded steel pipelines[S]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2010
国家能源局. SY/T 6151-2009 钢质管道管体腐蚀损伤评价方法[S]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2010
25 Coulson K E W, Worthingham R G. Standard damage-assessment approach is overly conservative[J]. Oil Gas J., 1990, 88: 7084745
26 O’Grady II T J, Hisey D T, Kiefner J F. Evaluating corroded pipe-conclusion: pressure calculation for corroded pipe developed[J]. Oil Gas J., 1992, 90: 84
27 Sun Y B, Jia W L, Zhang Y M, et al. Calculation of residual strength of L245NCS steel pipe with double corrosion defects of different size[J]. Chin. J. Appl. Mech., 2022, 39: 367
孙溢彬, 贾文龙, 张洋铭 等. 含不同尺寸双腐蚀缺陷L245NCS钢管剩余强度计算[J]. 应用力学学报, 2022, 39: 367
28 Feng X X, Yu Y, Xu L X, et al. Critical failure pressure of submarine pipeline with double corrosion defect[J]. China Offshore Platform, 2018, 33(5): 87
冯欣鑫, 余 杨, 徐立新 等. 双腐蚀缺陷海底管道临界失效压力[J]. 中国海洋平台, 2018, 33(5): 87
29 Xiong C B, Ye Z, Yang G, et al. Analysis on failure pressure of submarine pipelines under the influence of double corrosion defects[J]. Mater. Prot., 2022, 55(S1): 52
熊春宝, 叶 壮, 杨 光 等. 双腐蚀缺陷影响下的海底管道失效压力分析[J]. 材料保护, 2022, 55(S1): 52
30 Andrews R M, Gallon N, Huising O J C. Assessing damaged pipelines transporting hydrogen[J]. J. Pipeline Sci. Eng., 2022, 2: 100066
doi: 10.1016/j.jpse.2022.100066
31 Zhang H, Tian Z G. Failure analysis of corroded high-strength pipeline subject to hydrogen damage based on FEM and GA-BP neural network[J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47: 4741
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.11.082
32 Guo S W, Xu L Y, Dong S H, et al. Finite element modeling of hydrogen atom diffusion and distribution at corrosion defect on aged pipelines transporting hydrogen[J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48: 13566
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.287
33 Kumnick A J, Johnson H H. Deep trapping states for hydrogen in deformed iron[J]. Acta Metall., 1980, 28: 33
doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(80)90038-3
34 Gorban A N, Sargsyan H P, Wahab H A. Quasichemical models of multicomponent nonlinear diffusion[J]. Math. Model. Nat. Phenom., 2011, 6: 184
doi: 10.1051/mmnp/20116509
35 Krom A H M, Koers R W J, Bakker A. Hydrogen transport near a blunting crack tip[J]. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1999, 47: 971
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5096(98)00064-7
36 Cisneros M M, Lopez H F, Salas N, et al. Hydrogen permeability in a plasma nitrided API X52 steel[J]. Mater. Sci. Forum, 2003, 442: 85
doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.442
37 Yang F Q, Zhan W J, Yan T, et al. Numerical analysis of the coupling between hydrogen diffusion and mechanical behavior near the crack tip of titanium[J]. Math. Probl. Eng., 2020, 2020: 3618589
38 Wijmans J G, Baker R W. The solution-diffusion model: a review[J]. J. Membr. Sci., 1995, 107: 1
doi: 10.1016/0376-7388(95)00102-I
39 Sofronis P, McMeeking R M. Numerical analysis of hydrogen transport near a blunting crack tip[J]. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1989, 37: 317
doi: 10.1016/0022-5096(89)90002-1
40 Hirth J P. Effects of hydrogen on the properties of iron and steel[J]. Metall. Trans., 1980, 11A: 861
41 McLellan A G. Non-hydrostatic thermodynamics of chemical systems[J]. Proc. Roy. Soc., 1970, 314A: 443
42 Hafsi Z, Mishra M, Elaoud S. Hydrogen embrittlement of steel pipelines during transients[J]. Proc. Struct. Integr., 2018, 13: 210
43 Xu L Y, Cheng Y F. Corrosion of X100 pipeline steel under plastic strain in a neutral pH bicarbonate solution[J]. Corros. Sci., 2012, 64: 145
doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2012.07.012
[1] ZHONG Manying. EFFECT OF HYDROGEN ON MECHANICAL PROPERTIES FOR 2(1/4)Cr-1Mo STEEL[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2011, 31(3): 236-239.
No Suggested Reading articles found!