Please wait a minute...
中国腐蚀与防护学报  2023, Vol. 43 Issue (5): 1119-1125     CSTR: 32134.14.1005.4537.2022.341      DOI: 10.11902/1005.4537.2022.341
  海洋材料腐蚀与防护及钢筋混凝土耐久性与设施服役安全专栏 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 |
混凝土界面处理工艺对劈裂粘结性能的影响
石建光1(), 陈银平1, 李国聪1, 谢益人2
1.厦门大学建筑与土木工程学院土木工程系 厦门 361000
2.厦门合立道工程设计集团股份有限公司 厦门 361000
Effect of Different Interface Treatment Processes on Anti-stripping Performance of Low Shrinkage-high Viscosity Multi-element Composite Mortar Repaired Concrete Workpiece
SHI Jianguang1(), CHEN Yinping1, LI Guocong1, XIE Yiren2
1.Department of Civil Engineering, School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361000, China
2.Xiamen Helidao Engineering Design Group Co., Ltd., Xiamen 361000, China
全文: PDF(9326 KB)   HTML
摘要: 

为探究低收缩高粘性多元复合修复砂浆 (LSHVRM) 修复混凝土不同界面处理工艺对粘结性能的影响,试验设计54个修复试件。研究了针对混凝土的界面碳化程度以及是否埋置钢筋的不同工况,采用涂刷迁移型阻锈剂、喷涂DPS补强剂和涂刷迁移型阻锈剂、钢筋锈蚀转化等处理工艺对粘结性能的影响。试验结果表明: 混凝土表面碳化程度对粘结性能的影响很小,表面涂刷迁移型阻锈剂不会对粘结性能产生不利影响,影响幅度在-1.4%~6.8%之间;喷涂DPS补强剂对粘结性能均有提高,提高幅度在2.7%~7.4%之间。混凝土界面有锈蚀钢筋时,经过钢刷处理后对粘结性能的影响很小,幅度在-2.7%~5.4%之间;喷涂DPS补强剂和涂刷迁移型阻锈剂对粘结性能有提高,提高幅度在0.6%~6.9%之间;钢筋锈蚀转化剂后再喷涂DPS补强剂对粘结性能均有提高,提高幅度在4.5%~16.6%之间。混凝土表面不同碳化程度下,锈蚀钢筋钢刷处理、涂刷迁移型阻锈剂和钢筋锈蚀转化等界面处理工艺对粘结性能不会产生不利影响,对粘结性能均有提高,但幅度有限。

关键词 低收缩高粘性多元复合修复砂浆界面处理工艺锈蚀钢筋转化迁移型阻锈剂粘结性能    
Abstract

In order to reveal the effect of different interface treatment processes on the bonding properties of low shrinkage and high viscosity multi-element composite repair mortar (LSHVRM) to the repaired concrete workpiece, 54 repair test-pieces were designed. The effect of treatment processes, such as brushing migration corrosion inhibitor, spraying DPS reinforcing agent, brushing migration corrosion inhibitor and chemical conversion of corrosion products on steel bar on the anti-stripping performance of the repaired workpieces were studied especially, focusing on the influence of carbonization degree of concrete interface at the site to be repaired and whether there are steel bars buried or not. The results show that the carbonization degree of the surface of the repairing concrete has only a little effect on the bonding performance, namely the surface brushing migration type rust inhibitor resulted in an effect range between -1.4% and 6.8%. The spraying DPS reinforcing agent resulted in an increase range of 2.7%-7.4%. In case, rust steel bars emerged at the interface, the effect of steel brush treatment brought an effect range of -2.7% to 5.4%. However, The combination of spraying DPS reinforcing agent and brushing migration corrosion inhibitor could increase the bonding performance within a range of 0.6% and 6.9%. The spraying DPS reinforcing agent after the treatment with chemical conversion agent for rust steel bars could provide an increasing effect within a range of 4.5% and 16.6%. In general, the interface treatment process, such as steel brush treatment of steel bar, brush migration corrosion inhibitor and chemical conversion treatment of the rust steel bar, will bring little adverse effect on the bonding performance of the repaired concrete, while bring improvement effect within a small range, although these treatment methods has induced different degrees of carburization for the surface of repairing concrete.

Key wordslow shrinkage and high viscosity multiple composite repair mortar    interface treatment process    transformation of corroded steel bar    migrating rust inhibitor    bonding performance
收稿日期: 2022-11-03      32134.14.1005.4537.2022.341
ZTFLH:  TU 528  
基金资助:厦门市鼓浪屿管委会项目(XDHT2020145A)
通讯作者: 石建光,E-mail: jgshi798@xmu.edu.cn,研究方向为历史建筑混凝土耐久性加固与防护   
Corresponding author: SHI Jianguang, E-mail: jgshi798@xmu.edu.cn   
作者简介: 石建光,男,1962年生,博士,教授

引用本文:

石建光, 陈银平, 李国聪, 谢益人. 混凝土界面处理工艺对劈裂粘结性能的影响[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2023, 43(5): 1119-1125.
SHI Jianguang, CHEN Yinping, LI Guocong, XIE Yiren. Effect of Different Interface Treatment Processes on Anti-stripping Performance of Low Shrinkage-high Viscosity Multi-element Composite Mortar Repaired Concrete Workpiece. Journal of Chinese Society for Corrosion and protection, 2023, 43(5): 1119-1125.

链接本文:

https://www.jcscp.org/CN/10.11902/1005.4537.2022.341      或      https://www.jcscp.org/CN/Y2023/V43/I5/1119

MaterialDPS reinforcing agentZX-03 corrosion conversion agentPCI-2015 rust inhibitor
AppearanceTransparenceBrownish blackAmber
Density1.10 g/cm3-0.88-1.00 kg/L
pH value11-10-12
Viscosity11.1/s-11 mPa·s
Surface tension20.7 mN/m-32.5
Gelation time280 min--
State-Liquid-
Active ingredient content-72%-
Volatile organic compounds content-<60 g/L-
Amount of coating-0.3-0.7 kg/m2-
Drying time (25 ℃)-12 h-
Surface tension-≈32.5 mN/m
Flash point-≥90 ℃
表1  修复材料性能指标
图1  修复混凝土基体及混凝土试件劈裂加载示意图
Process name No.ClassificationTreatment of corroded steel barMatrix reinforcementConcrete surface protection
Measure 1

No embedded

steel at interface

---
Measure 2--PCI-2015 rust inhibitor
Measure 3-DPS reinforcing agentPCI-2015 rust inhibitor
Measure 4

Embedded steel

bar at interface

Steel brush to remove rust--
Measure 5Steel brush to remove rustDPS reinforcing agentPCI-2015 rust inhibitor
Measure 6ZX-03 corrosion conversion agentDPS reinforcing agentPCI-2015 rust inhibitor
表2  模拟混凝土界面处理工艺
Sample No.Steel specificationsCarbonization duration / dProcess name No.Splitting strength / MPaMaximum error / %
1-7Measure 11.492.01
2-7Measure 21.523.28
3-7Measure 31.585.06
4ϕ=12 mm7Measure 41.452.06
5ϕ=12 mm7Measure 51.559.03
6ϕ=12 mm7Measure 61.699.46
7-14Measure 11.461.36
8-14Measure 21.441.39
9-14Measure 31.503.33
10ϕ=12 mm14Measure 41.482.70
11ϕ=12 mm14Measure 51.532.61
12ϕ=12 mm14Measure 61.553.22
13-28Measure 11.482.02
14-28Measure 21.588.22
15-28Measure 31.596.91
16ϕ=12 mm28Measure 41.568.33
17ϕ=12 mm28Measure 51.574.45
18ϕ=12 mm28Measure 61.639.20
表3  劈裂试验平均劈裂强度结果
图2  混凝土基体内聚破坏形貌
图3  粘结修复界面破坏形貌
图4  混凝土基体与界面混合破坏形貌
图5  工艺1~6的混凝土劈裂强度
图6  碳化混凝土基体微观形貌
图7  混凝土界面(Y-1#)和3%D-ZX阻锈剂(Y-2 #)的表面形貌
1 Hu H M, Zhu J, Liu T, et al. Deterioration status and reason analysis of concrete components in Gulangyu historic buildings [J]. J. Xiamen Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2022, 61: 298
1 胡红梅, 朱 杰, 刘 涛 等. 鼓浪屿历史建筑混凝土构件劣化现状及原因分析 [J]. 厦门大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 61: 298
2 Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. 14th five-year plan for building energy conservation and green building development [S]. Beijing: China Building Industry Press, 2022
2 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. “十四五”建筑节能与绿色建筑发展规划 [S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2022
3 Jiang J, Wang J Y, Jin W J, et al. Research progress on corrosion and anti-corrosion technology of ribbed steel [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Prot., 2021, 41: 439
3 姜 军, 王军阳, 金武俊 等. 带肋钢腐蚀及其防腐蚀技术研究进展 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2021, 41: 439
4 Yuan Q, Liu J. Study on adhesive shear strength of young on old concrete [J]. J. Build. Struct., 2001, 22(2): 46
4 袁 群, 刘 健. 新老混凝土粘结的剪切强度研究 [J]. 建筑结构学报, 2001, 22(2): 46
5 Zhang M J, Chu L S, Zhao J F, et al. Experimental study on splitting strength of new-to-old concrete in short age [J]. Sichuan Build. Sci., 2018, 44(5): 106
5 张明杰, 楚珑晟, 赵杰夫 等. 短龄期旧混凝土与新混凝土劈裂强度的研究 [J]. 四川建筑科学研究, 2018, 44(5): 106
6 Cui H. Influencing factors and mechanism of bonding between new and old concrete under the action of new interfacial agents [D]. Zhengzhou: North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, 2018
6 崔 寒. 新型界面剂作用下新老混凝土粘结影响因素及机理研究 [D]. 郑州: 华北水利水电大学, 2018
7 Da B, Yu H F, Ma H Y, et al. Influence of inhibitors on reinforced bar corrosion of coral aggregate seawater concrete [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Prot., 2019, 39: 152
7 达 波, 余红发, 麻海燕 等. 阻锈剂的掺入方式对全珊瑚海水混凝土中钢筋锈蚀的影响 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2019, 39: 152
8 Ma Q, Cai J S, Mu S, et al. Composite organic compound as corrosion inhibitor for reinforced steel in simulated concrete pore solution or mortar specimen [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Prot., 2021, 41: 659
8 马 麒, 蔡景顺, 穆 松 等. 有机氨基醇阻锈剂在混凝土模拟孔隙液和砂浆试块中对钢筋的阻锈作用 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护报, 2021, 41: 659
9 Hu L M, Ma C M, Xu C G, et al. Impacts from different bonding agents on bonding strength between new and old concretes of second age [J]. Water Resour. Hydropower Eng., 2016, 47(11): 40
9 胡良明, 马朝猛, 徐晨光 等. 不同界面剂对第二龄期新老混凝土粘结强度的影响 [J]. 水利水电技术, 2016, 47(11): 40
10 Al-Sulaimani G J, Kaleemullah M, Basunbul I A. Influence of corrosion and cracking on bond behavior and strength of reinforced concrete members [J]. ACI Struct. J., 1990, 87: 220
11 Auyeung Y, Balaguru P, Chung L. Bond behavior of corroded reinforcement bars [J]. ACI Mater. J., 2000, 97: 214
12 Zhang X P, Yan H, Liu X X, et al. Effect of composite rust inhibitor on corrosion resistance of reinforcement in concrete and its application research [J]. New Build. Mater., 2021, 48(11): 64
12 张小平, 严 涵, 刘喜旭 等. 复合型阻锈剂对混凝土中钢筋耐蚀性的影响及应用研究 [J]. 新型建筑材料, 2021, 48(11): 64
13 Zhao Z F, Zhou H G, Yuan Q, et al. Study on Bonding Mechanism of New and Old Concrete and its Engineering Application [M]. Beijing: Water Resources and Hydropower Press, 2003
13 赵志方, 周厚贵, 袁 群 等. 新老混凝土粘结机理研究与工程应用 [M]. 北京: 水利水电出版社, 2003
14 Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. JG/T 468-2015 Interface primer for building wall [S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2015
14 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. JG/T 468-2015 墙体用界面处理剂 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2015
15 Zhu J. Study on low shrinkage and high viscosity multi-component composite repair mortar for historical building restoration [D]. Xiamen: Xiamen University, 2022
15 朱 杰. 历史建筑修复用低收缩高粘性多元复合修复砂浆研究 [D]. 厦门: 厦门大学, 2022
16 Zhao Z F, Zhao G F. Experimental research on treating interface of young on old concrete with high pressure water jet method [J]. J. Dalian Univ. Technol., 1999, 39: 558
16 赵志方, 赵国藩. 采用高压水射法处理新老混凝土粘结面的试验研究 [J]. 大连理工大学学报, 1999, 39: 558
17 Cao W L, Lin D Z, Qiao Q Y, et al. Experimental study on bond-slip properties and influence factors between rebars and recycled concrete [J]. J. Nat. Disasters, 2017, 26(5): 36
17 曹万林, 林栋朝, 乔崎云 等. 钢筋与再生混凝土粘结性能及影响因素研究 [J]. 自然灾害学报, 2017, 26(5): 36
18 Wang X A. Study on bond-slip behavior of steel bar and concrete subjected to freezing-thawing and stirrup corrosion [D]. Harbin: Harbin University of Technology, 2019
18 王轩昂. 考虑冻融和箍筋锈蚀影响的钢筋混凝土粘结性能试验研究 [D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2019
19 Li G Y, Xie H C, Xiong G J. Bonding model and microstructure analysis of new and old concrete [J]. Concrete, 1999, (6): 13
19 李庚英, 谢慧才, 熊光晶. 新老混凝土的粘结模型及微观结构分析 [J]. 混凝土, 1999, (6): 13
20 Zhao Y R, Yu B T, Wang L, et al. Effect of carbonization on concrete pore structure [J]. Concrete, 2021, (12): 7
20 赵燕茹, 喻泊厅, 王 磊 等. 碳化对混凝土孔结构的影响 [J]. 混凝土, 2021, (12): 7
[1] 蔡新华,徐世,尹世平,何真. 超高韧性水泥基复合材料与锈蚀钢筋粘结性能试验研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2012, 32(3): 228-234.