|
|
Polarization Analysis of Reinforced after Electrochemical Repair |
JIN Weiliang1,2, GUO Zhu1, XU Chen1 |
1. Institute of Structural Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China;
2. Ningbo Institute of Technology, Zhejiang University, Ningbo 315800, China |
|
|
Abstract Different researchers make different conclusions on the reinforcement corrosion parameters after electrochemical repair. In order to give a reasonable explanation of the phenomenon, anodic polarization curve (APC) is employed to study the effects of electrochemical repair methods on polarization parameters of reinforced in simulated pore solution. The results show that the effects of different treatment duration and current density on the anodic polarization current and potential of the reinforced after various treatments. After the treatment, the anodic polarization current and reinforcement potential change a lot: the greater the power, the more the increase of anodic polarization current, the more the reduction of reinforcement potential. Over time, this change gradually weakens until smooth, which is a depolarization process, and usually takes 42 days. After depolarization, the polarization current of the reinforced is still relatively large compared with that before the treatment, usually 2~5 times, that shows the treatment can increase the polarization area of the reinforced, also 2~5 times; however, reinforcement potential changes little. By analysis of surface morphology of the reinforced, it is found that the surface of the reinforced becomes rougher after treatment, surface area increasing will make the polarization area increase, which is a reasonable interpretation of polarization current increasing after treatment.
|
|
|
[1] Sawada S, Page C L, Page M M. Electrochemical injection of organic corrosion inhibitors into concrete [J]. Corros. Sci., 2005, 47(8): 2063-2078 [2] Kubo J, Sawada S, Page C L, et al. Electrochemical inhibitor injection for control of reinforcement corrosion in carbonated concrete [J]. Mater. Corros., 2008, 59(2): 107-114 [3] Geng C L, Weng D, Xu Y M. Inhibition efficiency of migration corrosion inhibitors assessed by electro-osmosis method [J].Corros. Prot., 2010, 31(7):528-531(耿春雷,翁端,徐永模. 利用电渗的方法评价渗透迁移型钢筋阻锈剂的效能 [J]. 腐蚀与防护, 2010, 31(7): 528-531) [4] Fajardo G, Escadeillas G, Arliguie G. Electrochemical chloride extraction (ECE) from steel-reinforced concrete specimens contaminated by “artificial” sea-water [J]. Corros. Sci., 2006, 48(1): 110-125 [5] Green W K, Lyon S B, Scantlebury J D. Electrochemical changes in chloride-contaminated reinforced concrete following cathodic polarization [J]. Corros. Sci., 1993, 35 (5-8): 1627-1631 [6] Marcotte T D, Hansson C M, Hope B B. The effect of the electrochemical chloride extraction treatment on steel-reinforced mortar, Part 1: Electrochemical measurements [J]. Cem. Concr. Res., 1999, 29(10): 1555-1560 [7] Miranda J M, Cobo A, Otero E, et al. Limitations and advantages of electrochemical chloride removal in corroded reinforced concrete structures [J]. Cem. Concr. Res., 2007, 37(4): 596-603 [8] Zhang Y. Realkalization technique for carbonated concrete structures [D]. Shanghai: Shanghai University of Electric Power, 2010(张羽. 碳化混凝土结构再碱化技术 [D]. 上海:上海电力学院, 2010) [9] Yeih W, Chang J J, Hung C C. Selecting an adequate procedure for the electrochemical chloride removal [J]. Cem. Concr. Res., 2006, 36(3): 562-570 [10] Xu C, Jin W L, Wang C K. Distinguishing the depassivation of rebar in concrete with weak polarization method [J]. J. Transp. Sci. Eng., 2009,25(4):31-36(许晨, 金伟良, 王传坤. 混凝土中钢筋脱钝的电化学弱极化判别方法 [J]. 交通科学与工程, 2009, 25(4): 31-36)
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|