去膜金属表面最大反应电流与电位的关系

中国腐蚀与防护学报

1987, Vol. 7

Issue (1): 35-40

研究报告

本期目录 | 过刊浏览

去膜金属表面最大反应电流与电位的关系

朱应扬;王旷;朱日彰;张文奇

北京钢铁学院;北京钢铁学院;北京钢铁学院;北京钢铁学院

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MAXIMUM CURRENT DENSITY ON BARE METAL SURFACE AND APPLIED POTENTIAL

Zhu Yingyang Wang Kuang Zhu Rizhang Zhang Wenqi (Beijing University of Iron and Steel Technology)

全文: PDF(542 KB)

摘要: 用划破电极的方法研究了无膜不锈钢在氯化物溶液中的反应电流i与电位E的关系,logi与E成直线关系,其斜率达几百毫伏。这一现象在其它材料/环境体系中也存在。分析和推导表明欧姆降、扩散及新鲜金属裸露过程中形成氧化膜都不是电流随电位上升缓慢的主要原因。从阴离子吸附于新鲜表面减小反应活性区面积的角度可以推出具有几百毫伏斜率的表观塔菲尔关系,由此可以推测阴离子吸附对电极反应的影响是表观塔菲尔斜率过大的主要原因。

Abstract：The reaction current density on the surface of scratched stainless steel in chloride solution was studied as a function of applied potential. There is a linear relationship between log i and potential E with a slope of about hundreds of millivolts. This rule is followed not only by the stainless steel/electrolyte system studied in this work, but also by other alloy/environment systems. The detailed discussion shows that the ohmic resistance, diffusion and the oxide ifilm formed during generation of fresh metal surface, can not account for the apparent slow current density increase with applied potential. It has been shown, however, that such large slope arises mainly from adsorption of anions on the bare metal surface.

收稿日期: 1987-02-25

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	朱应扬
	王旷
	朱日彰
	张文奇
44.8K

引用本文:

朱应扬;王旷;朱日彰;张文奇. 去膜金属表面最大反应电流与电位的关系[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 1987, 7(1): 35-40.
. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MAXIMUM CURRENT DENSITY ON BARE METAL SURFACE AND APPLIED POTENTIAL. J Chin Soc Corr Pro, 1987, 7(1): 35-40.

链接本文:

https://www.jcscp.org/CN/ 或 https://www.jcscp.org/CN/Y1987/V7/I1/35

[1] Parkins, R. N., Br. Corros. J., 14, 5 (1979)
[2] 朱应扬;朱日彰;王旷;张文奇,中国腐蚀与防护学报,7(1) ,27(1987)
[3] Ford, F. P.; Silverman, M., Corrosion, 36, 558(1980)
[4] Engseth, P., Scully, J. C., Corros. Sci., 15, 505(1975)
[5] Burstein, G. T.;.Ashley, G. W., Corrosion, 39, 241(1983)
[6] Burstein, G. T.; Davvles, D. H., J. Electrochem、Soc., 128． 33(1981)
[7] Ford. F. P.; Burstein, G. T.; Hoar, T. P., J. Electrochem 'Soc., 127, 1325 (1980)
[8] Rimbert. J. F.; Pagetti. J., Corros. Sci., 20, 189(1980)
[9] Beck. T. R., Electrochim, Acta, 18, 815(1973)
[10] Muralidharan. V. S.; Rajagopalan, K. S., Br. Corros. J., 14, 231 (1979)
[11] Burstein. G. T.; Marshall, P. I., Corros. Sei., 23． 125(1983)
[12] Dhar, H. P.; Conway, P. E.; Joshi. K. M., Electrochim, Acta. 18, 789 (1973)
[13] Parsons, R., J. Electroanal, Chem. 8, 93(1964)
[14] Parry, J. M.; Parsons, R., J. Electrochem, Soc., 113, 992(1966)
[15] Lawrence, J.; Parsons, R., J. Phys. Chem., 73, 3577 (1969)
[16] Wroblowa. H.; Kovac, Z.; Bockris, J. M., Trans, Fara. Soc., 61． 1523(1965)
[17] 邱永嘉等.《大学化学手册》,山东科学技术出版社’29(1985)
[18] Habib, M. Ahsan, Modern Aspects of Electrochemistry No. 12 Ed. by J. O'M. Bockris; It. E.Conway, New York, 131 (1977)

No related articles found!

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed