Please wait a minute...
Journal of Chinese Society for Corrosion and protection  2018, Vol. 38 Issue (6): 579-586    DOI: 10.11902/1005.4537.2017.205
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Effect of Sulfuric Acid Anodizing on Mechanical Properties of 2E12 Al-alloy
Gaohong CHEN1(),Yuansen HU2,Mei YU2,Jianhua LIU2,Guoai LI1
1. Beijing Engineering Research Center of Advanced Aluminum Alloys and Applications, Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials, Beijing 100095, China
2. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
Download:  HTML  PDF(12575KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

2E12 Al-alloys without and with an Al-clad layer were treated via the traditional sulfuric acid anodizing process, so that an anodic oxide film was prepared on their surface. The effect of the Al-clad layer and anodic oxidation time on the surface morphology and mechanical properties of the anodic oxide films was investigated by means of morphological characterization, tensile property test and fatigue life test. The results showed that the dissolution of the second phase in the matrix of 2E12 Al-alloys can result in the formation of voids on the surface oxide film during the anodic oxidation process. With the increasing oxidation time, the thickness of the oxide film gradually increases, whilst the number and size of voids also increase. After sulfuric acid anodizing, the tensile property of 2E12 Al-alloy keeps basically unchanged, but the fatigue life decreases obviously. For the sulfuric acid anodized 2E12 Al-alloy without Al-clad layer, the fatigue life decreases to 30% of that for the counterpart . After the anodic oxidation treatment, the fatigue cracks originate from the defects of the oxide film surface, and the fatigue fracture shows multiple crack characteristics.

Key words:  aerospace aluminum alloy      sulfuric acid anodic oxidation      fatigue life      Al-clad layer     
Received:  29 November 2017     
ZTFLH:  TG174.451  
Corresponding Authors:  Gaohong CHEN     E-mail:  18611641263@163.com

Cite this article: 

Gaohong CHEN,Yuansen HU,Mei YU,Jianhua LIU,Guoai LI. Effect of Sulfuric Acid Anodizing on Mechanical Properties of 2E12 Al-alloy. Journal of Chinese Society for Corrosion and protection, 2018, 38(6): 579-586.

URL: 

https://www.jcscp.org/EN/10.11902/1005.4537.2017.205     OR     https://www.jcscp.org/EN/Y2018/V38/I6/579

PretreatmentSolutionTemperature / °CTime / s
Degreasing20 g/L Na3PO45080
10 g/L Na2CO3
5 g/L NaOH
Etching50 g/L NaOH5060
Pickling400 g/L HNO32510
Table 1  Chemical compositions of metal pretreatment solutions, processing time and temperature
Fig.1  Schematic diagram of tensile specimen (unit: mm)
Fig.2  Schematic diagram of fatigue specimen (unit: mm)
Fig.3  Thicknesses of anodization films of unclad and alcl-ad 2E12 Al-alloy as a function of time
Fig.4  Surface SEM images of unclad (a1~d1) and alclad (a2~d2) 2E12 Al-alloy after anodization for 15 min (a1, a2), 30 min (b1, b2), 45 min (c1, c2) and 60 min (d1, d2)
SampleAnodizing time / minσb/ MPaδ10/ %σP0.2/ MPa
Unclad 2E12 Al-alloy047121.3329
1547120.4328
3046920.7325
4546120.2321
6046619.4325
Alclad 2E12 Al-alloy045321.4316
1545619.4316
3045319.2317
4545218.1316
6045518.9313
Table 2  Tensile properties of unclad and alclad 2E12 Al-alloy before and after anodizing
Anodizing time / minNo.Fatigue lifeNi/ cyclelgN50Fatigue lifeN50/ cycleRelative life / %
011.63×1055.16001.45×105100%
21.49×105
31.57×105
41.19×105
51.39×105
1514.7×1044.67604.8×10433%
24.8×104
33.9×104
44.7×104
55.8×104
3015.7×1044.62214.3×10430%
24.3×104
34.7×104
44.0×104
52.8×104
4514.9×1044.64454.4×10430%
24.5×104
34.7×104
44.6×104
53.5×104
6015.1×1044.71645.2×10436%
24.9×104
35.2×104
46.0×104
54.9×104
Table 3  Fatigue life of unclad 2E12 Al-alloy anodized for different time
Anodizing time / minNo.Fatigue lifeNi/ cyclelgN50Fatigue lifeN50/ cycleRelative life / %
018.6×1044.97409.4×104100%
29.5×104
39.9×104
41.03×105
58.9×104
1517.6×1044.92978.5×10490%
28.5×104
38.9×104
47.9×104
59.8×104
3017.6×1044.86307.3×10478%
27.2×104
36.9×104
47.2×104
57.6×104
4516.0×1044.77406.0×10464%
25.4×104
36.5×104
46.4×104
55.5×104
6017.4×1044.84457.0×10474%
26.3×104
37.0×104
47.1×104
57.2×104
Table 4  Fatigue life of alclad 2E12 Al-alloy anodized for different time
Fig.5  Fatigue relative lifes of unclad (a) and alclad (b) 2E12 Al-alloy
Fig.6  Fracture morphologies of unclad (a1~a5) and alclad (b1~b5) 2E12 Al-alloy anodized for 0 min (a1, b1), 15 min (a2, b2), 30 min (a3, b3), 45 min (a4, b4) and 60 min (a5, b5)
[1] Chen Z G,Ren J K,Zhang J S,et al.Regulation mechanism of novel thermomechanical treatment for microstructure and properties of 2E12 aluminum alloy[J].Rare Met. Mater. Eng.,2015,44:2341
[2] Liu X Y,Jiang J M,Chen Z T,et al.Research progress in anti-corrosive protection for aluminum alloy[J].Mod. Paint Finish.,2007,10(12):11
[2] 刘希燕,蒋健明,陈正涛等.铝合金防腐保护研究进展[J].现代涂料与涂装,2007,10(12):11
[3] Yin D Y,Liu H Q,Chen Y Q,et al.Effect of grain size on fatigue-crack growth in 2524 aluminium alloy[J].Int. J. Fatigue,2016,84:9
[4] Capelossi V R,Poelman M,Recloux I,et al.Corrosion protection of clad 2024 aluminum alloy anodized in tartaric-sulfuric acid bath and protected with hybrid sol-gel coating[J].Electrochim. Acta,2014,124:69
[5] Yoganandan G,Balaraju J N,Grips V K W.The surface and electrochemical analysis of permanganate based conversion coating on alclad and unclad 2024 alloy[J].Appl. Surf. Sci.,2012,258:8880
[6] Sieber M,Morgenstern R,Lampke T.Anodic oxidation of the AlCu4Mg1 aluminium alloy with dynamic current control[J].Surf. Coat. Technol.,2016,302:515
[7] Ma Y,Zhou X,Thompson G E,et al.Anodic film formation on AA 2099-T8 aluminum alloy in tartaric-sulfuric acid[J]. J. Electrochem. Soc.,2011,158:C17
[8] Mingo B,Němcová A,Hamad D,et al.Efficiency of anodising of Al-Cu alloy in sulphuric acid at low potentials[J].Trans. IMF,2015,93:18
[9] Zhang Y B,Zhang L M,Zhang J W,et al.Effect of anodizing treatment on bending fatigue properties of 2014-T6 aluminium alloy[J].Acta Metall. Sin.,2014,50:715
[9] 张艳斌,张立民,张继旺等.阳极氧化处理对2014-T6铝合金弯曲疲劳性能的影响[J].金属学报,2014,50:715
[10] Yu M,Chen G H,Liu J H,et al.Effect of adipic acid on fatigue performance of sulfuric anodizing for aluminum alloy[J].Heat Treat. Met.,2011,36(6):50
[10] 于美,陈高红,刘建华等.己二酸对铝合金硫酸阳极氧化疲劳性能的影响[J].金属热处理,2011,36(6):50
[11] China Iron and Steel Industry Association, CISA.GB/T 228.1-2010 Metallic materials-tensile testing-Part 1: Method of test at room temperature[S].Beijing:China Standard Press,2011
[11] 中国钢铁工业协会.GB/T 228.1-2010 金属材料 拉伸试验 第1部分: 室温试验方法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2011
[12] HB 5287-96 Fatigue Test Method of Metal Material Under Axial Loading [S].Beijing:China Standard Press,1996
[12] HB 5287-96 金属材料轴向加载疲劳试验方法 [S].北京: 中国标准出版社,1996
[13] Veys-Renaux D,Chahboun N,Rocca E.Anodizing of multiphase aluminium alloys in sulfuric acid:In-situelectrochemical behaviour and oxide properties[J].Electrochim. Acta,2016,211:1056
[14] Yan J H,Peng C.Effect of sodium benzoate content on microstructure and properties of boric-sulfuric acid anodic film materials protection[J].Mater. Prot.,2013,46(10):18
[14] 颜杰红,彭超.苯甲酸钠含量对硼酸-硫酸阳极氧化膜形貌和性能的影响[J].材料保护,2013,46(10):18
[15] Huang Y S,Shih T S,Chou J H.Electrochemical behavior of anodized AA7075-T73 alloys as affected by the matrix structure[J].Appl. Surf. Sci.,2013,283:249
[1] BAO Juncheng, ZHAO Jie, WANG Zhiqi, MA Xu.
EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON FATIGUE PROPERTY OF WELDED JOINTS OF BT20 TITANIUM ALLOY IN CORROSION ENVIRONMENT
[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2010, 30(4): 313-316.
[2] ;. INFLUENCE OF COATING OF COVERING AIRPLANE ON CORROSION FATIGUE LIFE OF ALUMINIUM ALLOY LY12CZ[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2006, 26(1): 34-36 .
No Suggested Reading articles found!